One of the most challenging decisions for primary school principals is to decide what class level each of their teachers will teach. It seems there is very little research on the way principals go about making these decisions. Government reforms have had significant impact on the role of the primary school principal in New Zealand, and a trend has emerged that some teachers are choosing to remain in the same school and class level. This study focused on eight primary school principals, and how they made decisions in relation to teacher class placement. A review of literature around leadership styles highlights the importance of relationships when implementing change such as teacher placement in different class levels. This study reveals that these principals practised an authentic style of leadership and highlights some important factors to be considered in determining teacher placement.
CoddJ.A. (1993). Managerialism, market liberalism and the move to self-managing schools in New Zealand. In SmythJ. (Ed.), A socially critical view of the self-managing school. London, UK: Falmer Press.
5.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
6.
Den HartogD.HouseR.J.HangesP.Ruiz-QuintanillaS. Antonio (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256.
7.
DesimoneL.M.Le FlochK. Carlson (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1–17.
8.
ErautM. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
9.
FennellH.-A. (2005). Living leadership in an era of change. Leadership in Education, 8(2), 145–165.
10.
FullanM. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London, UK: Falmer Press.
11.
FullanM.HargreavesA. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In MichaelFullanHargreavesA. (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1–9). London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
12.
GardinerJ. (2006). Transactional, transformational, and transcendent leadership: Metaphors mapping the evolution of the theory and practice of governance. Leadership Review, 6, (62–76).
13.
GardnerW.AvolioB.LuthansB.MayD.WalumbwaF. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343–372.
14.
GilesD. (2008). Exploring the teacher—student relationship in teacher education: A hermeneutic phenomenological inquiry. Unpublished PHD thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
GronnP. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141–158.
17.
HarrisA. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership heresy, fantasy or possibility?School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324.
18.
HarrisA. (2007). Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 315–325.
19.
KatzL.G. (1995). Talks with teachers of young children: A collection. Norwood, OH: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
20.
KrauseK.L.BochnerS.DuchesneS.McMaughA. (2010). Educational psychology for learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning.
21.
LangeD.Minister of Education. (1988). Tomorrow's schools: The reform of education administration in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government).
22.
Le FevreD. (2010). Changing tack: Talking about change knowledge for professional learning. In TimperleyH.ParrJ. (Eds.), Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools (pp. 71–92). Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
23.
LeithwoodK.A. (1992). The principal's role in teacher development. In FullanM.HargreavesA. (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 86–103). London, UK: Falmer Press.
24.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
25.
MintzbergH. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
26.
MoirE. (1999). The stages of a teacher's first year. In SchererM. (Ed.), A better beginning. Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 19–23). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Development.
27.
NewellG.E.TallmanL.LetcherM. (2009). A longitudinal study of consequential transitions in the teaching of literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 89–127.
28.
RobinsonV.HohepaM.LloydC. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
29.
SpillaneJ.P.CamburnE.M.PustejovskyJ.ParejaA.S.LewisG. (2008). Taking a distributed perspective: Epistemological and methodological tradeoffs in operationalizing the leader plus aspect. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 189–213.
30.
StoreyA. (2004). The problem of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 24(3), 249–265.
31.
TimperleyH. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395–420.
32.
TimperleyH.ParrJ. (2010). Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
33.
WrightN. (2001). Leadership, ‘bastard leadership’ and managerialism: Confronting twin paradoxes in the Blair education project. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 29(3), 275–290.
34.
WrightN. (2003). Principled ‘bastard leadership’? A rejoiner to Gold, Evans, Earley, Halpin and Collarbone. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 139–143.
