Modernising the teaching profession has become one of the main goals of contemporary educational system reform. The evaluation of teachers has been integral to the new teacher quality policies and programs. This article provides a comparative and critical analysis of the evaluations that teachers now confront during their professional careers. Examples of teacher evaluation practices and processes from Australia, Canada, the United States, and England are described and analysed.
Australian Commonwealth Government. (2005). Teachers for the twenty-first century. Australian Government Quality Teacher Initiative. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from http://www.qualityteaching.dest.gov.au
2.
BallS.J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3.
BallS.J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Education Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.
4.
BarnetB. (2002). Assessing and supporting new teachers: Lessons from the Southeast Teaching Quality in the Southeast Policy brief. Washington, DC: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality.
5.
BotteryM. (1989). The education of business management. Oxford Review of Education, 15(2), 129–146.
6.
BowerB.E. (2003). Preparing for the First Ontario Teacher Qualifying Test. MA Thesis: CTL. University of Toronto.
7.
DavisD.R.PoolJ.E.Mits-CashM. (2000). Issues in implementing new teacher assessment in a large urban school district: Results of a qualitative field study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 285–306.
8.
DeanM. (1995). Governing the unemployed self in an active society. Economy and Society, 25(4), 559–583.
9.
DukeD.L. (1995). Conflict and consensus in the reform of teacher evaluation. In DukeD.L. (Ed.), Teacher evaluation policy: From accountability to professional development. (pp. 173–188). New York: State University of New York Press.
10.
EllettC.TeddlieC. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101–128.
11.
FeatherstoneM. (1995). Undoing culture: Globalization, postmodernism and identity. London: Sage.
12.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
13.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
14.
GewirtzS. (1997). Post-welfarism and the reconstruction of teachers' work in the UK. Journal of Education Policy, 12(4), 217–231.
15.
HeldD.McGrewA. (2000). The global transformations reader. London: Polity Press.
16.
KleinhenzE.IngvarsonL.CowanR.C. E. (2001). A discussion of teacher evaluation policies and practices in Australian states and their relation to quality teaching and learning. Paper presented at the AARE Conference. Fremantle, Western Australia.
17.
LarsenJ. (2002). PricewaterhouseCoopers teacher workload study. Presentation at the Institute of Education, London.
18.
LarsenM.LockC.LeeM. (2005). Professional certification and entry-to-practice assessments. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.
19.
MahonyP.HextallI. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: Routledge/Falmer.
20.
MitchellK.J.RobinsonD.Z.PlakeB.S.KnowlesK.T. (Eds.). (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. National Research Council Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2005). Standards and National Board Certification. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http://www.nbpts.org/standards/nbcert.cfm.
22.
National Foundation for Educational Research. (2002). Contented and committed?: A survey of quality of working life amongst teachers. Slough, Berkshire, UK: Author.
23.
NeaveG. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.
24.
New South Wales Department of Education. (2000). Quality matters: Revitalising teaching: Critical times, critical choices. Report of the Review of Teacher Education. Sydney: Author.
25.
Ontario Provincial Government. (2001). Supporting Teacher Excellence: Quality in the Classroom Act. An Amendment to the Education Act. Ontario: Author.
26.
OvandoM. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 213–231.
27.
PetersonK.D. (1990). Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers. In MillmanJ.Darling-HammondL. (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 104–115). Newbury Park: Sage.
28.
PowerM. (1994). The audit explosion. London: Demos.
29.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2001). Teacher workload study. London: Department for Education and Employment.
30.
Queensland Board of Teacher Registration. (2005). Current requirements for registration. Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://www.btr.qld.edu.au
31.
RoseN. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
ShepardL.A.KreitzerA.E.GraueM.E. (1987). A case study of the Texas teacher test: Technical report. Report No. 276. Los Angeles: Centre for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education, University of California, LA.
33.
ShulmanL. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
Teacher Training Agency. (2005). Computerised QTS skills test. London: Author. Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://www.tta.gov.uk.
TraversC.L.CooperC.L. (1996). Teachers under pressure: Stress in the teaching profession. London: Routledge.
38.
TromanG. (2000). Teacher stress in the low-trust society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 331–353.
39.
TuckerP.StrongeJ.H.GareisC.R.BeersC.S. (2003). The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: Do they make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 572–602.
40.
United Kingdom, Department of Education and Employment (UK DfEE). (1998). Teachers: Meeting the challenge of change. London: Author.
41.
United Kingdom, Department for Education and Skills (UK DfES). (2001). Professionalism and trust—the future of teachers and teaching. London: Author.
42.
United States Department of Education. (1987). What's happening in teacher testing: An analysis of state teacher testing practices. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
43.
United States Federal Government (US Govt). (2002). A quality teacher in every classroom: Improving teacher quality and enhancing the profession. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
44.
WaltonM. (1986). The Deming management method. New York: Putnam.
