What Motivates High School Students to Want to Be Teachers? The Role of Salary,Working Conditions,and Societal Evaluations About Occupations in a Comparative Perspective
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2018
What Motivates High School Students to Want to Be Teachers? The Role of Salary,Working Conditions,and Societal Evaluations About Occupations in a Comparative Perspective
This study examines between-country differences in the degree to which teachers’ working conditions, salaries, and societal evaluations about desirable job characteristics are associated with students’ teaching career expectations. Three-level hierarchical generalized linear models are employed to analyze cross-national data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Results reveal that teacher salaries and societal evaluations about the importance of job responsibility and respect are positively associated with teaching career expectations, while working hours are negatively associated with teaching career expectations. Analyses further reveal that the association between salaries and career expectations and societal evaluations and career expectations differ among students with different mathematics skills. We conclude by discussing policy initiatives that can encourage students with strong quantitative abilities to consider a career in teaching.
BacolodM. (2007). Who teaches and where they choose to teach: College graduates of the 1990s. Educational Evaulation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 155–168.
BoskinM. J. (1974). A conditional logit model of occupational choice. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 389–398.
4.
BrookhartS. M.FreemanD. J. (1992). Charateristics of entering teacher candidate. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37–60.
5.
ChmielewskiA. K.DumontH.TrautweinU. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of students’ mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 925–957.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
7.
DoltonP. (1990). The economics of UK teacher supply: The graduate’s decision. The Economic Journal, 100, 91–104.
8.
DoltonP.MakepeaceG. H. (1993). Female labour force participation and the choice of occupation: The supply of teachers. European Economic Review, 37(7), 1393–1411.
9.
EcclesJ. (1983). Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
10.
EcclesJ.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
EliasP. (1997). Occupational classification (ISCO-88): Concepts, methods, reliability, validity and cross-national comparability (OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 20). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/304441717388
13.
ErautM. (1994). Developing Professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
14.
European Commission. (2013a). Study on the policy measures to improve the attractiveness of the teaching profession in Europe (Vol. 1, Final Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
15.
European Commission. (2013b). Study on the policy measures to improve the attractiveness of the teaching profession in Europe (Vol. 2, Final Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
16.
EURYDICE. (2012). Key data on education in in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
GottfredsonL. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545–579.
19.
GreenwaldR.HedlinM.LaineR. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
20.
GuarinoC. M.SantibanezL.DaleyG. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.
21.
HanushekE.KainJ. F.RivikinS. G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (NBER Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
HanushekE.PaceR. R. (1995). Who chooses to teach (and why)?Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101–117.
23.
HanushekE.PiopiunikM.WiederholdS. (2014). The value of smarter teachers: International evidence on teacher cognitive skills and student performance (NEBR Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
IngersollR. M. (2003). Turnover and shortages among science and mathematics teachers in the United States. In RhotonJ.BowersP. (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (pp. 1–12). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
IngersollR. M.MerrillE. (2011). The status of teaching as a profession. In BallantineJ.SpadeJ. (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (4th ed., pp. 185–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press/Sage Publications.
KyriacouC.CoulthardM. (2000). Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career choice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 117–126.
31.
KyriacouC.KuncR. (2007). Begining teachers’ expectations of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1246–1257.
32.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
33.
LeungS. A. (2008). The big five career theories. In AthanasouJ. A.Van EsbroeckR. (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 115–132). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
34.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
LuekensM.LyterD.FoxE. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000–01. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004301.pdf
36.
MarshR. M. (1971). The explanation of occupational prestige. Social Forces, 50, 214–222.
37.
MeroniE. C.Vera-ToscanoE.CostaP. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308–323.
38.
MuñozM. A.PratherJ. R.StrongeJ. H. (2011). Exploring teacher effectiveness using hierarchical linear models: Student- and classroom-level predictors and cross-year stability in elementary school reading. Planning and Changing, 43(3/4), 241–273.
39.
NagengastB.MarshH. W. (2012). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1033–1053.
40.
NeittaanmäkiL.GrossE. B.VirjoI.HyppöläH.KumpusaloB. (1999). Personal values of male and female doctors: Gender aspects. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 559–568.
41.
NyeB.KonstantopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
42.
OddenA.CarolynK. (2001). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Crown Press, Inc.
43.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
44.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006a). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.
45.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006b). Strating strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
46.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Education at a glance 2008: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
47.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
48.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
49.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn (Vol. III). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
50.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
51.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013c). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
52.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014a). PISA 2012 technial report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
53.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014b). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
54.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
55.
PageJ.PageF. (1984). High school perceptions of teaching as a career opportunity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, New Orleans, LA.
56.
ParboteeahK. P.CullenJ. B.PaikY. (2013). National differences in intrinsic and extrinsic work values: The effects of post-industrialization. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 13(2), 159–174.
57.
ParkH.ByunS.-Y. (2015). Why some countries attract more high-ability young students to teaching: Cross-national comparisons of students’ expectation of becoming a teacher. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 523–549.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60.
RichardsonP. W.WattH. M. G. (2010). Current and future directions in teacher motivation research. In KarabenickS.UrdanT. C. (Eds.), The decade ahead: Applications and contexts of motivations and achievement (pp. 139–173). Bradford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
61.
RivikinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
62.
RoeR. A.EsterP. (1999). Values and work: Empirical findings and theoretical perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 1–21.
63.
RoystonP. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
64.
RutkowskiL.GonzalezE.JoncasM.von DavierM. (2010). International large-scale assessment data issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151.
65.
SchleicherA. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
66.
SchwartzS. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.
StokesA. (2007). Factors influencing the decisions of university students to become high school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 17(1), 127–145.
69.
SuperD. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282–298.
70.
TolbertP. S.MoenP. (1998). Men’s and women’s definitions of “good” jobs. Work and Occupations, 25(2), 168–194.
71.
TuckerM. S. (Ed.). (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
VegasE.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2001). From high school to teaching: Many steps, who makes it?Teachers College Record, 103(3), 427–449.
76.
WattH. M. G.RichardsonP. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428.
77.
WattH. M. G.RichardsonP. W. (2012). An introduction to teaching motivations in different countries: Comparisions using the FIT-choice scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 185–197.
78.
WattH. M. G.RichardsonP. W.KlusmannU.KunterM.BeyerB.TrautweinU.BaumertJ. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 791–805.
79.
WolterS.DenzlerS. (2004). Wage elasticity of the teacher supply in Switzerland. Brussels Economic Review, 47(3/4), 387–407.
80.
WrightS. P.HornS. P.SandersW. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
