The majority of young people in custody have alcohol and other drug problems and over 90% report past-year experiences of high-risk drinking and illicit drug use. Despite a strong link between drug use and violent offending, there is a dearth of information about how this relationship plays out in sentencing young adult offenders. This study examines themes in the sentencing of drug-using young adults facing court for serious violent crime and describes how judges discuss rehabilitation as a consideration for this high-risk group. This research contributes to the literature by bridging law and social science through a cross sectional analysis of n = 507 sentencing remarks from New South Wales higher courts. Substance use involvement was indicated in more than three-quarters (77%) of violent offence cases. Among young adults sentenced for violent crimes involving substance use (n = 51) robbery and homicide were the most common offences, and alcohol and methamphetamine were the most frequently involved substances. Two themes emerged around judges’ reasons for sentencing, one emphasising offender agency and choice and another more compassionate position acknowledging the influence of drug dependence on offending behaviour. Despite this divide, addressing substance use dependence was commonly seen as key for the successful rehabilitation of young people who commit violent crime involving alcohol and other drugs.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA.
2.
Anleu, S. R., & Mack, K. (2013). Judicial authority and emotion work. In Judicial Review: Selected Conference Papers: Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, The, 11(3), 329. Judicial Commission of NSW.
Australian Institute of Criminology. (2003). The public health approach to crime prevention. AICrime reduction matters no. 7. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from https://aic.gov.au/publications/crm/crm007
BaldryE.DowseL.ClarenceM. (2012). People with mental and cognitive disabilities: Pathways into prison. Paper presented at the Background Paper for Outlaws to Inclusion Conference. February: University of New South Wales.
9.
BarrettE. L.TeessonM.MillsK. L. (2014).
Associations between substance use, post-traumatic stress disorder and the perpetration of violence: A longitudinal investigation. Addictive Behaviors,
39(6), 1075–1080.
10.
BartelsL. (2012). Sentencing of Indigenous women. Brief No 14, Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse, November. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2188703.
11.
Bartels, L., & Hopkins, A. (forthcoming). Engaging head and heart: An Australian story on the role of compassion in criminal justice reform. In S Bandes et al. (Eds), Research handbook on law and emotion, Edward Elgar.
12.
BolesS. M.MiottoK. (2003).
Substance abuse and violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior,
8(2), 155–174.
13.
BonnieR. J.StroudC. E.BreinerH. E. (2014). Investing in the health and well-being of young adults.
Washington, DC:
National Academies Press.
14.
BouhoursB. (2006). Adolescent sex offending: An analysis of judicial sentencing remarks (Honours thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane.
15.
BrightD. A.HughesC. E.ChalmersJ. (2012).
Illuminating dark networks: A social network analysis of an Australian drug trafficking syndicate. Crime, Law and Social Change,
57(2), 151–176. doi:10.1007/s10611-011-9336-z
16.
Butrus, N. (2018). Judicial sentencing considerations in cases of violent offenders versus sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(5), 653--674.
17.
Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois review: social science research on race, 10(2), 303--312.
18.
ChassinL. (2008).
Juvenile justice and substance use. Future of Children,
18(2), 165–183. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0017
19.
CohenA. O.BreinerK.SteinbergL.BonnieR. J.ScottE. S.Taylor-ThompsonK., … HellerA. S. (2016).
When is an adolescent an adult? Assessing cognitive control in emotional and nonemotional contexts. Psychological Science,
27(4), 549–562.
20.
Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241--1299.
21.
CroweJ. (2013).
The role of contextual meaning in judicial interpretation. Federal Law Review,
41(3), 417–442.
22.
DeanK.GoodhewS.BowmanJ.HellerE.LewandowskiA.KorobanovaD., … KennedyA. (2015). Young people in custody health survey.
Sydney, Australia:
Justice Health, Forensic Mental Health Network & Juvenile Justice.
23.
DeeringR.MellorD. (2009).
Sentencing of male and female child sex offenders: Australian study. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
16(3), 394–412. doi:10.1080/13218710902930291
24.
DegenhardtL.CoffeyC.CarlinJ. B.SwiftW.MooreE.PattonG. C. (2010).
Outcomes of occasional cannabis use in adolescence: 10-year follow-up study in Victoria, Australia. The British Journal of Psychiatry,
196(4), 290–295.
25.
DegenhardtL.SaraG.McKetinR.RoxburghA.DobbinsT.FarrellM., … HallW. D. (2017).
Crystalline methamphetamine use and methamphetamine‐related harms in Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review,
36(2), 160–170.
26.
DentonM. (2014). Hoping against hope: The prison-to-community transition experience of men with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorder (PhD thesis). The University of Queensland, QLD.
27.
DowseL.CummingT. M.StrnadováI.LeeJ.-S.TrofimovsJ. (2014).
Young people with complex needs in the criminal justice system. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,
1(2), 174–185.
28.
DoyleM. F.ShakeshaftA.GuthrieJ.SnijderM.ButlerT. (2019).
A systematic review of evaluations of prison‐based alcohol and other drug use behavioural treatment for men. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,
43(2), 120–130.
29.
DucatL. V. (2013). Risks and determinants of firesetting behaviour: Characteristics, psychiatric morbidity and recidivism (PhD thesis). Monash University, Melbourne.
30.
EdgelyM. (2009).
Common law sentencing of mentally impaired offenders in Australian courts: A call for coherence and consistency. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
16(2), 240–261.
31.
FougereA.ThomasS.DaffernM. (2013).
A study of the multiple and complex needs of Australian young adult offenders. Australian Psychologist,
48(3), 188–195. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00083.x
32.
FreibergA. (2002).
Therapeutic jurisprudence in Australia: Paradigm shift or pragmatic incrementalism. Law Context: A Socio-Legal J,
20, 6.
HallM. (2017). The lived sentence: Rethinking sentencing, risk and rehabilitation (PhD thesis). UNSW Sydney, Sydney.
35.
HallM.WrightR. (2008).
Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law Review,
96(1), 63–122.
36.
HarkinK.FletcherB.O’BrienB. (2007). Adult CARDS: Final evaluation report.
Adelaide, Australia:
Office of Crime Statistics and Research.
37.
HaysomL.IndigD.MooreE.GaskinC. (2014).
Intellectual disability in young people in custody in New South Wales, Australia: Prevalence and markers. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,
58(11), 1004–1014.
38.
HopkinsA.BartelsL. (2019). Paying attention to the person: Compassion, equality and therapeutic jurisprudence. In N Stobbs, L Bartels and M Vols (Ed.), The methodology and practice of therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, Forthcoming.
39.
HughesC.RitterA. (2008). Monograph No. 16: A summary of diversion programs for drug and drug-related offenders in Australia. In DPMP monograph series. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.
40.
HughesC. E.BrightD. A.ChalmersJ. (2017).
Social network analysis of Australian poly-drug trafficking networks: How do drug traffickers manage multiple illicit drugs?Social Networks, 51, 135--147. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2016.11.004
41.
JeffriesS.BondC. (2009).
Does indigeneity matter? Sentencing indigenous offenders in South Australia’s higher courts. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology,
42(1), 47–71.
42.
MacleodJ.OakesR.CopelloA.CromeI.EggerM.HickmanM., … SmithG. D. (2004).
Psychological and social sequelae of cannabis and other illicit drug use by young people: A systematic review of longitudinal, general population studies. The Lancet,
363(9421), 1579–1588.
43.
MakkaiT.PayneJ. (2003).
Key findings from the drug use careers of offenders (DUCO) study. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice,
267, 1–8.
44.
McGorreryP. (2016).
Judicial recognition of PTSD in crime victims: A review of how much credence Australian courts give to crime-induced PTSD. Journal of Law and Medicine,
24(2), 478–503.
45.
McKetinR.LubmanD. I.NajmanJ. M.DaweS.ButterworthP.BakerA. L. (2014).
Does methamphetamine use increase violent behaviour? Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. Addiction,
109(5), 798–806. doi:10.1111/add.12474
46.
McNamara, L., Quilter, J., Seear, K. & Room, R. (2017). Evidence of Intoxication in Australian Criminal Courts: A Complex Variable with Multiple Effects. Monash University Law Review, 43, 148.
47.
MeynenG. (2010).
Free will and mental disorder: Exploring the relationship. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics,
31(6), 429–443.
48.
Mosher, J., & Jernigan, D. (2001). Making the link: a public health approach to preventing alcohol-related violence and crime. Journal of Substance Use, 6(4), 273--289.
NSW Sentencing Council. (2015). Alcohol and drug fuelled violence.
Sydney, Australia:
NSW Sentencing Council.
54.
PaternosterR.BachmanR.BushwayS.KerrisonE.O’ConnellD. (2015).
Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: Arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology,
1(3), 209–235.
55.
PayneJ. (2007). Recidivism in Australia: Findings and future research.
Canberra:
Australian Institute of Criminology.
56.
PayneJ.GaffneyA. (2012).
How much crime is drug or alcohol related? Self-reported attributions of police detainees. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice,
439, 1–6.
57.
PolettiP.DonnellyH. (2013).
Special circumstances under s 44 of the crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. Sentencing Trends and Issues,
42, 1–28.
58.
PotasI. (1991). The principles of sentencing violent offenders: Towards a more structured approach. Serious violent offenders: Sentencing, psychiatry and law reform.
Canberra:
Australian Institute of Criminology.
59.
PutniņšA. L. (2003).
Substance use and the prediction of young offender recidivism. Drug and Alcohol Review,
22(4), 401–408.
60.
QuilterJ.McNamaraL. (2018).
The meaning of “intoxication” in Australian criminal cases: Origins and operation. New Criminal Law Review,
21(1), 170–207.
61.
QuilterJ.McNamaraL.SeearK.RoomR. (2018).
The significance of ‘intoxication’ in Australian criminal law. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice,
546, 1–16.
RichardsK.BartelsL.BolithoJ. (2017).
Children’s court magistrates’ views of restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence measures for young offenders. Youth Justice,
17(1), 22–40.
69.
RoomR.BaborT.RehmJ. (2005).
Alcohol and public health. The Lancet,
365(9458), 519–530.
70.
SotiriM. (2003). Punishment and imprisonment in New South Wales: Towards a conceptual analysis of purpose (PhD thesis). UNSW Sydney, Sydney.
71.
SquegliaL. M.JacobusJ.TapertS. F. (2009).
The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience,
40(1), 31–38.
72.
StoolmillerM.BlechmanE. A. (2005).
Substance use is a robust predictor of adolescent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
32(3), 302–328.
73.
SullivanF. (2017).
Not just language: An analysis of discursive constructions of disability in sentencing remarks. Continuum,
31(3), 411–421. doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1275143
74.
SutherlandR.SindicichN.BarrettE.WhittakerE.PeacockA.HickeyS.BurnsL. (2015).
Motivations, substance use and other correlates amongst property and violent offenders who regularly inject drugs. Addictive Behaviors,
45, 207–213.
75.
Sutherlandv R. (2016). NSWDC 266 (Austl.). Retrieved from Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII).
76.
TannerJ. L.ArnettJ. J. (2011).
Presenting “emerging adulthood”: What makes it developmentally distinctive. In Debating emerging adulthood: Stage or process. Oxford University Press: New York.
77.
ThomasD. R. (2006).
A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation,
27(2), 237–246.
78.
Tomlinson, M. F., Brown, M., & Hoaken, P. N. (2016). Recreational drug use and human aggressive behavior: A comprehensive review since 2003. Aggression and violent behavior, 27, 9--29.
79.
TorokM.DarkeS.KayeS.ShandF. (2015).
The association of early-life and substance use risks to violent offending among injecting drug users. Drug and Alcohol Review,
34(1), 10–17.
80.
WanW.-Y.MoffattS.JonesC.WeatherburnD. (2012). Effect of arrest and imprisonment on crime, The. Contract No. 158. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
81.
WeatherburnD. (2008). The NSW drug court: A re-evaluation of its effectiveness.
Sydney, Australia:
Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research New South Wales.
82.
WeathersF.BlakeD.SchnurrP.KaloupekD.MarxB.KeaneT. (2013). The life events checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Retrieved from www.ptsd.va.gov
83.
WellsJ. E.HorwoodL. J.FergussonD. M. (2004).
Drinking patterns in mid‐adolescence and psychosocial outcomes in late adolescence and early adulthood. Addiction,
99(12), 1529–1541.
84.
Whittle, M., & Hall, G. (2018). Intimate Partner Homicide: Themes in Judges’ Sentencing Remarks. Psychiatry, psychology and law, 25(6), 922–943.
85.
Yardley v Betts. (1979). (FC SA) (Austl.). Retrieved from Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII). 22 SASR 108.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
