One of the key issues in research on criminal desistance is the impossibility of stating with any degree of certainty that an offender's criminal career is in fact over. When no clear demarcation line can be established for the precise moment when criminal activity has ended, researchers instead distinguish between the cessation of criminal behaviour and the process of desistance. A second issue lies in the contradictions inherent in explanatory theories on desistance that focus either on agents or, conversely, on the structures that provoke and support the process of change. An integrative theoretical framework on criminal desistance, influenced by the work of Margaret Archer (1995, 2000, 2002) and showing the interplay between structures and agents, can be found elsewhere (F.-Dufour, Brassard, and Martel, forthcoming). The application of this framework to empirical data collected from 29 Canadian offenders serving conditional sentences reveals the existence of three distinct processes leading to desistance among those we metaphorically call the transformed, the remorseful and the rescued.
ArcherM. S. (1995) Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
ArcherM. S. (2000) Being human: The problem of agency, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArcherM. S. (2002) Realism and the problem of agency. Alethia5(1): 11–20.
4.
ArcherM. S. Structure, agency and the internal conversation.2003Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BarryM. (2006) Youth offending in transition: The search of social recognition, Abington, MA: Routledge.
6.
BeckerH. S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance, New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
BrackenD. C.DeaneL.MorrissetteL. (2009) Desistance and social marginalization: The case of Canadian Aboriginal offenders. Theoretical Criminology13(1): 61–78.
8.
BurnettR. (2004) To reoffend or not to reoffend? The ambivalence of convicted property offenders. In: MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (eds) After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, Cullompton, England: Willan, pp. 152–180.
9.
Burnett, R., & Maruna, S. (2004). So ‘prison works', does it? The criminal careers of 130 men release from prison under Home Secretary Micheal Howard. HowardJournal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390–404.
10.
CalverleyD. (2010) Les services correctionnels pour adultes au Canada, 2008–2009 [Adult correctional services in Canada, 2008–2009]. JuristatVol. 30, 32p.. (3, publication 85-002-x au catalogue de Statistique Canada).
11.
CharmazK. (2003) Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In: HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (eds) Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 311–330.
12.
CussonM.PinsonneaultP. (1986) The decision to give up crime. In: CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (eds) The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 72–82.
13.
FarrallS. (2002) Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime, Cullompton, England: Willan.
14.
FarrallS. (2004) Social capital and offender reintegration: Making probation desistance focused. In: MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (eds) After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, Cullompton, England: Willan, pp. 57–82.
15.
F.-Dufour, I., Brassard, R., & Guay, J.-P. (2009). Le sursis, la récidive et la réinsertion sociale: un équilibre précaire [Conditional sentence, recidivism and social reintegration: A precarious equilibrium]. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51(3), 303–327.
16.
F.-Dufour, I., Brassard, R., & Martel, J. (2013). An integrative approach to apprehend desistance. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminololgy. Retrieved from doi:10.11777/0306624X13509781.
17.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002) Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology107(4): 990–1064.
18.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18: 59–82.
19.
HardtJ.RutterM. (2004) Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45(2): 260–273.
20.
HorrocksI. (2009) Applying the morphogenetic approach: Outcomes and issues from a case study of information systems development and organisational change in British local government. Journal of Critical Realism8(1): 35–62.
21.
HunterA. J. (1985) Private, parochial and public social orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In: SuttlesG. D.ZaldM. N. (eds) The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society, Norwood, NJ: Aldex.
22.
KivinenO.PiiroinenT. (2006) On the limits of a realist conception of knowledge: A pragmatist critique of Archerian realism. The Sociological Review54(2): 224–241.
23.
KrohnM. D.GibsonC. L.ThornberryT. P. (2013) Under the protective bud the bloom awaits: A review of theory and research on adult-onset and late-blooming offenders. In: GibsonC. L.KrohnM. D. (eds) Handbook of life-course criminology: Emerging trends and directions for the future research, New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 183–200.
24.
KruttschnittC.UggenC.SheltonK. (2000) Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly17: 61–87.
25.
LandrevilleP.LehalleS.CharestM. (2004) L'emprisonnement avec sursis au Québec: Impact de l'arrêt Proulx et du nouveau cadre de gestion [Conditional sentence in the Province of Quebec: Impact of the Proulx judgment and the new penal regime], Montréal, Canada: Centre de Criminologie Comparée.
26.
LaubJ. H.NaginD. S.SampsonR. J. (1998) Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review63: 225–238.
27.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003) Shared beginnings, divergent lives. Delinquent boys to age 70, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
28.
LeBelT. P.BurnettR.MarunaS.BushwayS. (2008) The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology5(2): 131–159.
29.
MarunaS. (2001) Making good. How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A. (2007) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
MulveyE. P.SteinbergL.FaganJ.CauffmanE.PiqueroA. R.ChassinL. (2004) Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice2(3): 213–236.
32.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. D. (2009) Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology99(4): 1103–1156.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
PattonM. Q. (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSRL Health Services Research34(5): 1189–1208.
35.
PiqueroA. R. (2004) Somewhere between persistence and desistance: The intermittency of criminal careers. In: MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (eds) After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, Cullompton, England: Willan, pp. 102–125.
36.
PiresA. P. (1997) Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologique [Sampling in qualitative research: A theoretical and methodological essay]. In: PoupartJ. (ed) La recherche qualitative: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques [Qualitative research: Epistemological and methodological challenges]., Montréal, Canada: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur, pp. 113–169.
37.
RobertsJ. V. (2004) The virtual prison. Community custody and the evolution of imprisonment, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Savoie-ZajcL. (2009) L'entrevue semi-dirigée [The semi-structured interview]. In: GauthierB. (ed) Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données, Québec, Canada: Presse de l'Université du Québec, pp. 337–360.
39.
ShaplandJ.BottomsA. (2011) Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists. Punishment & Society13(3): 256–282.
40.
ShoverN. (1983) The later stages of ordinary property offender careers. Social Problems31(2): 208–218.
41.
ShoverN. (1996) Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42.
ThomasD. R. (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation27(2): 237–246.
43.
UggenC.ManzaJ.BehrensA. (2004) “Less than average citizen”: Stigma, role transition and civic reintegration of convicted felons. In: MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (eds) After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, Cullompton, England: Willan, pp. 261–293.
44.
VandenbergheF. (2007) Une ontologie réaliste pour la sociologie: Système, morphogénèse et collectifs [A realist ontology for sociology: System, morphogenesis and collectivities]. Théorie et Méthodes46(3): 487–542.
45.
Veysey, B. M., Martinez, D. J., & Christian, J. (2013). “Getting out”: A summary of qualitative research on desistance across the life course. In C. L. Gibons, & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Handbook of Life-Course criminology: Emerging Trends and directions for future research (pp. 233–260). New York, NY: Springer Science+Buisness Media.
46.
WorrallA. (1998) Real punishment for real criminals? Community sentences and the gendering of punishment. British Society of Criminology. . Retrieved from http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume1/009.pdf.
