International Organization for Standardization (ISO).International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). Geneva: ISO, 1993
2.
RiggJCBrownSSDybkærROlesenH. Compendium of Terminology and Nomenclature of Properties in Clinical Laboratory Sciences (Recommendations 1995). International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1995
3.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO).Statistics—Vocabulary and Symbols. Part I: Probability and General Statistical Terms. ISO 3534. 2nd edn.Geneva: ISO, 1993
4.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO).Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Bureau International des Poids et Mésures (BIPM), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). Geneva: ISO, 1993
5.
GiacomoP. News from the BIPM. Metrologia1981; 17: 69–74
6.
Eurachem. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 1st edn.Eurachem, 1995
7.
Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN)/Comité, Europeén de Normalisation Electrotechnique (CENELEC).General Criteria for the Operation of Testing Laboratories, EN 45001, 1st edn.CENELEC, 1993
8.
European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories (EAL).The Expression of Uncertainty in Quantitive Testing, draft 6. EAL/FTeut(96)01. EAL, 1996
9.
Commission of the European Communities.Guidelines for the Production and Certification of BCR Reference Materials. Directorate General XII. Doc. BCR/48/93. Brussels: CEC, 1994
10.
TaylorBNKuyattCE. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297. Gaithersburg: United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994
11.
Commission of the European Communities.Draft Proposal for a Council Directive on in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices. Directorate General III, Doc. III/D/4041-92-EN. CEC, 1993
12.
SethJ. Standardization of protein hormone immunoassays. Ann Clin Biochem1996; 33: 482–5
13.
SchulsterDGainesDas REJeffcoateSL. International standards for human prolactin: calibration by international collaborative study. J Endocrinol1989; 121: 157–66
14.
KellyPA. Growth hormone and prolactin. In: BaulieuEEKellyPA, eds. Hormones, From Molecules to Disease. Paris: Herman, 1990: 189–223
15.
MoránCTenaGFonsecaMEOchoaRBermúdezJAZárateA. Changes in the prolactin serm isoforms secreted by a pituitary adenoma associated with terapy. Arch Med Res1994; 25: 1–3
16.
ChristensenJM. Correcting measurement errors using reference materials in method validation. Mikrochim Acta1996; 123: 231–40
17.
KristiansenJChristensenJMNielsenJL. Uncertainty of atomic absorption spectrometry: Application to the determination of lead in blood. Mikrochim Acta1996; 123: 241–9
18.
CohrssenJJCovelloVT. Risk Analysis: A Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks. Springfield: US Department of Commerce, 1988
19.
KristiansenJChristensenJMHeydornK. How to implement the ISO/BIPM/OIML/IUPAC guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement in TQM. In: ParkanyM, ed. Quality Assurance and TQM for Analytical Laboratories. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1995: 55–63
20.
MillerJCMillerJN. Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, 3rd edn.Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1993
21.
KragtenJ. Calculating standard deviations and confidence intervals with a universally applicable spreadsheet technique. Analyst1994; 119: 2161–5