The conditions for the smart colorimetric determination of cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium dodecyl sulfate by reaction with Coomassie brilliant blue G (CBBG) have been proposed. The nature of the absorption and fluorescence spectra of aqueous solutions of CBBG as a function of acidity has been investigated. A variety of reagent forms and associations with ionic surfactants have been demonstrated. The composition of the associates formed in the CBBG–cationic surfactant system has been established. The increase in the analytical signal of the cationic surfactant and the stabilization of the colloid-chemical state of the system during reactions in the organized medium of the nonionic surfactant Triton X-100 has been demonstrated. These effects are realized through association in premicellar solutions and as a result of the solubilization of components in Triton X-100 micellar solutions. The addition of long-chain cationic surfactants to the reagent occurs with the replacement of the heteroatom proton. The absorption of CBBG–cationic surfactant associates solutions increases with the length of the cationic surfactant hydrocarbon chain. Ethanol additives decrease the aggregation of CBBG. The technique of cationic surfactant determination has been tested in the analysis of the pharmaceutical. The results show that the simplicity of analytical signal registration with satisfactory correctness and acceptably high sensitivity of determination is an advantage of the developed technique.
FershtA.. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding. New Jersey: World Scientific, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1142/10574
GaitherC.PoppR.ZahediR.P.BorchersC.H.. “Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry Enables Robust Quantitation of Plasma Proteins Regardless of Whole Blood Processing Delays That May Occur in the Clinic”. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2022. 21(5): 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100212
4.
VernerovaA.KrcmovaL.K.HeneberkO.RadochováV., et al. “Chromatographic Method for the Determination of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Uric Acid in Human Saliva”. Talanta. 2021. 233: 122598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122598
5.
SilvaA.F.RochaF.R.. “A Novel Approach to Detect Milk Adulteration Based on the Determination of Protein Content by Smartphone-Based Digital Image Colorimetry”. Food Control. 2020. 115: 107299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107299
6.
ChawjiraphanW.ApiwatC.SegkhoonthodK.TreerattrakoonK., et al. “Albuminuria Detection Using Graphene Oxide-Mediated Fluorescence Quenching Aptasensor”. MethodsX. 2020. 7: 101114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101114
7.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 20483: 2013 Cereals and Pulses: Determination of the Nitrogen Content and Calculation of the Crude Protein Content—Kjeldahl Method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2013.
8.
XuJ.DouL.LiuS.SuL., et al. “Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Furazolidone Point-of-Care Testing: Cater to the Call of Saving Time, Labor, and Cost by Coomassie Brilliant Blue Labeling”. Food Chem. 2021. 352: 129415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129415
9.
HouP.DengR.GuoJ.ChenW., et al. “A WiFi Scanner in Conjunction with Disposable Multiplex Paper Assay for the Quantitation of Disease Markers in Blood Plasma”. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2021. 413(18): 4625–4634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03234-6
10.
TonelottoV.DaviniA.CardarelliL.CalderoneM.MarinP.. “Efficacy of Fluorecare SARS-Cov-2 Spike Protein Test Kit for SARS-Cov-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Samples of 121 Individuals Working in a Manufacturing Company”. PLoS One. 2022. 17(1): e0262174. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262174
11.
MoreiraD.C.. “RGBradford: Accurate Measurement of Protein Concentration Using a Smartphone Camera and the Blue to Green Intensity Ratio”. Anal. Biochem. 2022. 655: 114839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2022.114839
12.
OviedoM.J.QuesterK.HirataG.A.Vazquez-DuhaltR.. “Determination of Conjugated Protein on Nanoparticles by an Adaptation of the Coomassie Blue Dye Method”. MethodsX. 2019. 6: 2134–2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.09.015
13.
DuttaA.JoyM.T.R.AhsanS.M.A.KumarD., et al. “Physico-Chemical Parameters for the Assembly of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride and Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride Mixture in Aqueous and Alcoholic Media”. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.2023. 57: 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2022.09.019
14.
HoqueM.A.AliM.I.RubM.A.KumarD.KhanM.A.. “Physico-Chemical Properties of the Association of Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide and Bovine Serum Albumin Mixture in Aqueous-Organic Mixed Solvents”. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023. 228: 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.099
15.
Abdul RubM.HasanT.AkterR.KumarD., et al. “Physico-Chemical Investigation of the Assembly and Clouding Development Nature of the Mixture of Metformin Hydrochloride and Ionic/Nonionic Surfactants: Influences of Hydrotropes”. J. Mol. Liq. 2023. 371: 121070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121070
16.
ProggaS.I.KhanJ.M.HasanT.KumarD., et al. “Association of Bovine Serum Albumin and Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride: An Investigation of the Effects of Temperature and Hydrotropes”. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023. 246: 125592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125592
17.
AliM.M.HasanT.KhanJ.M.KumarD., et al. “Association Behavior and Physico-Chemical Parameters of a Cetylpyridinium Bromide and Levofloxacin Hemihydrate Mixture in Aqueous and Additive Media”. RSC Adv. 2023. 13(30): 20709–20722. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02621c
18.
KumarD.KhanJ.M.PosaM.PulikkalA.K., et al. “Effect of Quaternary Ammonium Gemini Surfactant Solution on the Rate Constant of the Ninhydrin-Lysine Reaction”. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023. 62(39): 15897–15906. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02499
RodgerA.SandersK.. “UV–Visible Absorption Spectroscopy, Biomacromolecular Applications”. In: LindonJ.C.TranterG.E.KoppenaalD.W., editors. Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry. Oxford, UK: Academic Press, 2017. Pp. 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803224-4.00108-4
21.
KielkopfC.L.BauerW.UrbatschI.L.. “Bradford Assay for Determining Protein Concentration”. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2020. 4: 102269. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot102269
22.
JinY.WenM.YuanQ.ZhangJ.TanW.. “Beneficial Effects of Coomassie Staining on Proteomic Analysis Employing PAGE Separation Followed with Whole-Gel Slicing, In-Gel Digestion, and Quantitative LC-MS/MS”. J. Chromatogr. B. 2019. 1110–1111: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.01.031
23.
KaliszczakaW.Nosal-WiercińskaA.J.. “The Importance of the Active Complexes of 6 Mercaptopurine with Bi(III) with Regards to Kinetics and Electrode Mechanism Changes in the Presence of Non-Ionic Surfactants”. Electroanal. Chem. 2018. 828: 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.026
24.
ZhangS.XuT.LiuQ.LiuJ., et al. “Cationic Gemini Surfactant-Resorcinol-Aldehyde Resin and Its Application in the Extraction of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds from Food Contacting Materials”. Food Chem. 2019. 277: 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.132
25.
DoroschukV.O.GrogulA.B.MandzyukY.S.MakukhaO.G.GrytsykN.O.. “Cloud Point Extraction of Disulfiram for Its HPLC-MS/MS Determination in Synthetic Urine”. Chem. Papers. 2016. 70(10): 1316–1321. https://doi.org/10.1515/chempap-2016-0074
26.
BkhaitanM.MirzaA.. “Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Meclizine in Pure and Dosage Form via Ion Pair Complex Formation Using Eosin Y”. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2018. 14(2): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573412912666161024145837
27.
ZhangQ.KimD.LiL.PatelS.DuhamelJ.. “Surfactant Structure-Dependent Interactions with Modified Starch Nanoparticles Probed by Fluorescence Spectroscopy”. Langmuir. 2019. 35(9): 3432–3444. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573412912666161024145837
KlovakV.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Influence of Colloid-Chemical State of Solutions on Fluorescence and Spectrophotometry Analytical Signals of Surfactants in Reaction with Eosin Y”. Chem. Pap. 2020. 74: 4337–4344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01245-8
30.
KorzhanL.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Smart Colorimetric Determination of Ionic Surfactants with Bromothymol Blue at the Presence of Nonionic Surfactant Triton X-100”. Methods Objects Chem. Anal. 2023. 18(3): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.17721/moca.2023.136-142
31.
CaoY.ZhaoJ.XiongY.L.. “Coomassie Brilliant Blue-Binding: A Simple and Effective Method for the Determination of Water-Insoluble Protein Surface Hydrophobicity”. Anal. Methods. 2016. 8(4): 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY02630J
32.
Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, 2019. 10th ed.
33.
MereyH.A.RamadanN.K.DiabS.S.MoustafaA.A.. “Green Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of a Binary Mixture of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Cetylpyridinium Chloride in the Presence of Dimethylaniline”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2020. 118743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.118743
34.
ChennamsettyR.KanchiS.BisettyK.NuthalapatiV.N.. “Monitoring of Cetylpyridinium Chloride Levels in Surface Waters: Patent Blue-V as Selective Ligand for Spectrophotometric Determination”. Asian J. Chem. 2016. 28(5): 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2016.19581
35.
BiswasS.PalA.. “Spectrophotometric Determination of Cationic Surfactants in Aqueous Media Using Chrome Azurol S as Colour Forming Agent and 1-Butanol as Extracting Solvent”. Talanta. 2020. 206: 120238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120238
36.
GeravandiS.MohammadiS.KhayatianG.. “A Green Microextraction Method for Determination of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate in Washing Liquid Samples Based on Continuous Sample Drop Flow-Based Microextraction”. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2019. 16(9): 1863–1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-019-01657-8
37.
KishiK.IchimuraA.ShuaiZ.OtsukaY., et al. “Alginic Acid Beads Containing Fluorescent Solvatochromic Dyes Display an Emission Color Response to a Cationic Surfactant”. Polymers (Basel). 2022. 14(21): 4649. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214649
