The influence of sodium hexadecyl sulfate on the nature of the fluorescence spectra of rhodamine 6G in an aqueous solution and a solution of nonionic Triton X-100 was investigated. The change in the nature of the emission spectra is explained by the formation of hydrophobic stoichiometric and sub-stoichiometric reagent-surfactant associates. Stabilization of the colloid-chemical state and reduction of the total turbidity of rhodamine 6G–anionic surfactant associate solutions with the addition of nonionic surfactant as a modifier were registered. The method of modification of the rhodamine 6G–sodium hexadecyl sulfate system with a nonionic surfactant was used in the development of conditions for the fluorescence determination of protein substances in physiological solutions. The concentration conditions for the use of the modified reagent system rhodamine 6G–anionic surfactant–nonionic surfactant for the fluorescence determination of albumin in urine were optimized.
AmabilinoD.B.. “Surfaces for Supramolecular Systems”. In: AmabilinoDB, Editor. Supramolecular Chemistry at Surfaces. London, UK: RSC Publishing, 2016. Vol. 1, Pp. 1–54.
2.
AveyardB.. “Aggregation of Surfactants in Solution”. In: AveyardB, Editor. Surfactants: in Solution, At Interfaces and in Colloidal Dispersions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019. Vol. 3. Chap. 9, Pp. 177–230.
3.
GrisciG.KozmaE.MrózW.PaganoK., et al. “Self-Assembly of a Water Soluble Perylene and Surfactant into Fluorescent Supramolecular Ensembles Sensitive to Acetylcholinesterase Activity”. RSC Adv. 2016. 6: 64374-64382.
4.
ZolgharneinJ.BagtashM.ShariatmaneshT.. “Simultaneous Removal of Binary Mixture of Brilliant Green and Crystal Violet Using Derivative Spectrophotometric Determination, Multivariate Optimization and Adsorption Characterization of Dyes on Surfactant Modified Nano-Γ-Alumina”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2015. 137: 1016-1028.
5.
QuagliottoP.BarberoN.BaroloC.BuscainoR., et al. “Water Based Surfactant-Assisted Synthesis of Thienylpyridines and Thienylbipyridine Intermediates”. Dyes Pigm. 2017. 137: 468-479.
6.
PetcuA.R.RogozeaE.A.LazarC.A.OlteanuN.L., et al. “Specific Interactions Within Micelle Microenvironment in Different Charged Dye/Surfactant Systems”. Arab. J. Chem. 2016. 9(1): 9-17.
7.
KaliszczakaW.Nosal-WiercińskaA.J.. “The Importance of the Active Complexes of 6 Mercaptopurine with Bi(III) with Regards to Kinetics and Electrode Mechanism Changes in the Presence of Non-Ionic Surfactants”. Electroanal. Chem. 2018. 828: 108-115.
8.
KulichenkoS.A.DolenkoS.A.SukhanV.V.MaksymiukO.G.. “Properties of Ionic Associates of Anionic Surfactants with Basic Dyes and Their Application in Analysis. I. Optical Characteristics, Composition, Stability, and Colloid-Chemical State of Associates”. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Chemistry. 1996. 33: 55–71.
9.
KlovakV.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Charge, Hydrophobic and Spatial Matching in the Association of Fluorescent Reagents with Ionic Surfactants in Aqueous Solutions”. Chem. Pap. 2021. 75: 2477-2484.
10.
KlovakV.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Matching Effects in the Interaction of Ionic Surfactants with Fluorescent Reagents in Micellar Solutions of Triton X 100”. Methods Objects Chem. Anal. 2021. 16(3): 117-126.
11.
KwonY.. “Partition Coefficients and Tissue Extraction Ratios of the PBPK Model for Monoclonal Antibody Disposition”. In: KwonY, Editor. Handbook of Essential Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism for Industrial Scientists. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002. Vol. 4, Chap. B.5, Pp. 90–91.
12.
DodziukH.. “Supramolecular Chemistry–What Is This?” In: DodziukH, Editor. Introduction to Supramolecular Chemistry. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands, 2002. Chap. 1, Pp. 1–19.
13.
LatifM.WanfiL.HanifN.RoslanR., et al. “Composition and Distribution of Surfactants Around Lake Chini, Malaysia”. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012. 184: 1325-1334.
14.
HampelM.MauffretA.PazdroK.BlascoJ.. “Anionic Surfactant Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonates (LAS) in Sediments from the Gulf of Gdańsk (Southern Baltic Sea, Poland) and Its Environmental Implications”. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012. 184: 6013-6023.
15.
FaitM.E.BakasL.GarroteG.L.MorcelleS.R., et al. “Cationic Surfactants as Antifungal Agents”. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019. 103: 97-112.
16.
ZhangG.YuY.GuoM.LinB., et al. “A Sensitive Determination of Albumin in Urine by Molecularly Imprinted Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Dual-Signal Strategy”. Sens. Actuators, B. 2019. 288: 564-570.
17.
Torrente-RodríguezR.M.CampuzanoS.Ruiz-Valdepeñas MontielV.GamellaM., et al. “Electrochemical Bioplatforms for the Simultaneous Determination of Interleukin (IL)-8 MRNA and IL-8 Protein Oral Cancer Biomarkers in Raw Saliva”. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016. 77: 543-548.
18.
BrusottiG.CalleriE.ColomboR.MassoliniG., et al. “Advances on Size Exclusion Chromatography and Applications on the Analysis of Protein Biopharmaceuticals and Protein Aggregates: A Mini Review”. Chromatographia. 2018. 81: 3-23.
19.
RenC.BaileyA.O.VanderportenE.C.OhA., et al. “Quantitative Determination of Protein-Ligand Affinity by Size Exclusion Chromatography Directly Coupled to High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry”. Anal. Chem. 2019. 91(1): 903-911.
20.
SilvaA.F.S.RochaF.R.P.. “A Novel Approach to Detect Milk Adulteration Based on the Determination of Protein Content by Smartphone-Based Digital Image Colorimetry”. Food Control. 2020. 115: 107299.
21.
VeríssimoM.I.S.AlmodôvarV.A.S.ToméA.C.GomesaT.S.R.. “Fluorescent Optrode for Proteins Based on a Diketopyrrolopyrrole Derivative: Practical Application to Total Protein Determination in Urine”. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020. 130: 106364.
22.
KanchanaW.SakaiT.TeshimaN.KatohS., et al. “Successive Determination of Urinary Protein and Glucose Using Spectrophotometric Sequential Injection Method”. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007. 604(2): 139-146.
23.
SteddonS.AshmanN.ChesserA.CunninghamJ.. “Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)”. In: SteddonSChesserACunninghamJ, Editors. Oxford Handbook of Nephrology and Hypertension, 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. Vol. 1, Chap. 3, Pp. 449–497.
24.
KlovakV.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Fluorescence Study of the Influence of the Structure and Hydrophobicity of Reagents and Cationic Surfactants in their Association in Aqueous Solutions”. Aust. J. Chem. 2020. 74(4): 252-260.
25.
StrelkovaK.VaryginaO.ChernovaR.KoblovaO., et al. “On Interaction of Synthetic Food Dye E133 with Cetylpiridinium Cations”. Izv. Saratov. Univ. 2017. 17: 376-381.
26.
KlovakV.KulichenkoS.LelyushokS.. “Influence of Colloid-Chemical State of Solutions on Fluorescence and Spectrophotometric Analytical Signals of Surfactants in Reaction with Eosin Y”. Chem. Pap. 2020. 74: 4337-4344.
27.
MorozovaJ.E.SyakaevV.V.KazakovaE.K.ShalaevaY.V., et al. “Amphiphilic Calixresorcinarene Associates as Effective Solubilizing Agents for Hydrophobic Organic Acids: Construction of Nano-Aggregates”. Soft Matter. 2016. 12: 5590-5599.
28.
RosenJ.M.. “Characteristic Features and Uses of Commercially Available Surfactants”. In: RosenJM, Editor. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. New York: Wiley Interscience, 2004. Vol. 4, Chap. A, Pp. 8–18.
29.
ZdziennickaA.SzymczykK.KrawczykJ.JańczukB.. “Critical Micelle Concentration of Some Surfactants and Thermodynamic Parameters of Their Micellization”. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2012. 322–323: 126-134.
30.
SeegmillerJ.C.BarnidgeD.R.BurnsB.E.LarsonT.S., et al. “Quantification of Urinary Albumin by Using Protein Cleavage and LC-MS/MS”. Clin. Chem. 2009. 55(6): 1100-1107.
31.
KanchanaW.SakaiT.TeshimaN.KatohS., et al. “Successive Determination of Urinary Protein and Glucose Using Spectrophotometric Sequential Injection Method”. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007. 604(2): 139-146.
32.
VeríssimoM.I.S.AlmodôvarV.A.S.ToméA.C.GomesaT.S.R.. “Fluorescent Optrode for Proteins Based on a Diketopyrrolopyrrole Derivative: Practical Application to Total Protein Determination in Urine”. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020. 130: 106364.
33.
SongH.WangH.JuS.JinQ., et al. “Simplified Microchip Electrophoresis for Rapid Separation of Urine Proteins”. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2014. 28(2): 104-109.
