The considerable variability in functional outcomes for speech and swallowing with different reconstruction techniques following partial glossectomy may reflect the ability of patients to adapt to altered tongue structure. The purpose of this study was to determine mechanisms of cortical adaptation in swallowing to partial glossectomy reconstructed with primary closure.
Methods:
Four patients treated with partial glossectomy and primary closure underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging at a mean of 6 months after operation, and the data were compared to those from 8 healthy controls.
Results:
Statistically significant increases in activity occurred predominately in the parietal cortices and the cerebellum. The volume of the resection was most highly correlated with activity in the premotor and parietal cortices and cerebellum.
Conclusions:
The adaptive changes in the cortex following partial glossectomy with primary closure reflect adaptation to the biomechanics of tongue movement during swallowing, and not altered sensation in the tongue.
McConnelFMSLogemannJARademakerAW. Surgical variables affecting postoperative swallowing efficiency in oral cancer patients: A pilot study. Laryngoscope1994; 104: 87–90.
2.
McConnelFMPauloskiBRLogemannJA. Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: A prospective study of speech and swallowing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1998; 124: 625–30.
3.
HaugheyBHTaylorSMFullerD. Fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction of the tongue and floor of mouth: Outcomes and techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002; 128: 1388–95.
4.
HsiaoHTLeuYSLinCC. Primary closure versus radial forearm flap reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: Functional assessment of swallowing and speech. Ann Plast Surg2002; 49: 612–6.
5.
KuriakoseMALoreeTRSpiesAMeyersSHicksWLJr. Sensate radial forearm free flaps in tongue reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2001; 127: 1463–6.
6.
MahSMDurhamJSAndersonDW. Functional results in oral cavity reconstruction using reinnervated versus nonreinnervated free fasciocutaneous grafts. J Otolaryngol1996; 25: 75–81.
7.
MurrayGMSessleBJ. Functional properties of single neurons in the face primary motor cortex of the primate. I. Input and output features of tongue motor cortex. J Neurophysiol1992; 67: 747–58.
8.
MartinREMurrayGMKemppainenPMasudaYSessleBJ. Functional properties of neurons in the primate tongue primary motor cortex during swallowing. J Neurophysiol1997; 78: 1516–30.
9.
SawczukAMosierKM. Neural control of tongue movement with respect to respiration and swallowing. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med2001; 12: 18–37.
10.
CorfieldDRMurphyKJosephsO. Cortical and subcortical control of tongue movements in movement in humans: A functional neuroimaging study using fMRI. J Appl Physiol1999; 86: 1468–77.
11.
LotzeMSeggewiesGErbMGroddWBirbaumerN. The representation of articulation in the primary sensorimotor cortex. Neuroreport2000; 11: 2985–9.
12.
MosierKM. Functional MRI of swallowing. In: MukherjiSKCastelijnsJA, eds. Medical radiology. Diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology: Modern head and neck imaging. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1999: 79–86.
13.
CohenLGBandinelliSFindleyTWHallettM. Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man. A study with focal magnetic stimulation. Brain1991; 114: 615–27.
14.
ElbertTSterrAFlorH. Input-increase and input-decrease types of cortical reorganization after upper extremity amputation in humans. Exp Brain Res1997; 117: 161–4.
15.
JonesEG. Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci2000; 23: 1–37.
16.
MosierKMLiuWCMaldjianJAShahRModiB. Lateralization of cortical function in swallowing: A functional MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1999; 20: 1520–6.
17.
MosierKMPatelRLiuWCKalninAMaldjianJBaredesS. Cortical representation of swallowing in normal adults: Functional implications. Laryngoscope1999; 109: 1417–23.
18.
MosierKBereznayaI. Parallel cortical networks for volitional control of swallowing in humans. Exp Brain Res2001; 140: 280–9.
19.
OgawaSLeeTMKayARTankDW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1990; 87: 9868–72.
20.
OgawaSMenonRSTankDW. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level—dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J1993; 64: 803–12.
21.
LiaoCHWorsleyKJPolineJ-BAstonJADDuncanGHEvansAC. Estimating the delay of the fMRI response. Neuroimage2002; 16: 593–606.
22.
TalairachJTournouxP. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1988.
23.
AndersenRASnyderLHBradleyDCXingJ. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci1997; 20: 303–30.
24.
ColbyCLDuhamelJ-R. Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res1996; 5: 105–15.
25.
FaillenotIDecetyJJeannerodM. Human brain activity related to the perception of spatial features of objects. Neuroimage1999; 10: 114–24.
26.
MecklingerAGruenewaldCBessonMMagniéM-NVon CramonD-Y. Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cereb Cortex2002; 12: 1115–23.
27.
BloedelJR. Functional heterogeneity with structural homogeneity: How does the cerebellum operate? In: CordoPHarnadS, eds. Movement control. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 64–76.
