Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) have seen a steady rise. Recent guidelines have established that PCIs conducted at non-surgical on-site (NSOS) facilities have low complication rates and outcomes comparable to surgical on-site (SOS) centers. However, differing perspectives in the growing literature continue to sustain controversy. A thorough literature review was performed across four databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify studies comparing outcomes between hospitals. The primary endpoints were: 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral vascular accident (CVA), emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (eCABG), rePCI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The final search yielded 22 studies, including a total of 2,181,897 patients. The majority of patients (71.9%) underwent PCI in SOS hospitals. There was a significant association of increased eCABG (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.08–3.67) and rePCI (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.37–1.91) rates in SOS hospitals. However, 30-day mortality (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.53–1.54), MI (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.91–1.28), CVA (OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.69–1.86), and TVR (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.92–1.21) showed no significant difference between hospitals. Subgroup analyses among clinical trials and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients found no significant associations. Conclusively, this meta-analysis provides updated insight into the impact of SOS on PCI outcomes, having no difference except for eCABG and rePCI rates.

Keywords

non-surgical on-site percutaneous coronary interventions surgical on-site coronary artery bypass surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tebbe

Hochadel

Bramlage

, et al. In-hospital outcomes after elective and non-elective percutaneous coronary interventions in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009;98:701-7.

Dziewierz

Brener

Siudak

, et al. Impact of on-site surgical backup on periprocedural outcomes of primary percutaneous interventions in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the ORPKI Polish National Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2018;122:929-35.

Grines

Box

Mamas

, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement on percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site surgical backup. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:847-60.

Melberg

Nilsen

Larsen

, et al. Nonemergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients. Am Heart J. 2006;152:888-95.

Akasaka

Hokimoto

Oshima

, et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at hospital with or without onsite cardiac surgery backup. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176:1385-7.

Goel

Gupta

Kolte

, et al. Outcomes and temporal trends of inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention at centers with and without on-site cardiac surgery in the United States. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:25-33.

Garg

Anderson

Oldroyd

, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention performed at offsite versus onsite surgical centers in the United Kingdom. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:363-72.

Cleveland Clinic. Heart attack (Myocardial Infarction) [Internet]. Cleveland Clinic. Published October 30, 2022. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16818-heart-attack-myocardial-infarction

The George Washington University Hospital. Understanding stroke [Internet]. George Washington University Hospital. Published October 13, 2015. Available from: https://www.gwhospital.com/conditions-services/neurosciences-institute/understandingstroke#:~:text=A%20stroke%2C%20also%20referred%20to

10.

Seshadri

Whitlow

Acharya

Houghtaling

Blackstone

Ellis

. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation. 2002;106:2346-50.

11.

Valliani

Artani

Azam

Tai

Kadir

. Determinant of repeat revascularization within 5 years of percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary care hospital, Karachi: a matched case-control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;75:103364.

12.

Alhejily

Ohman

. Repeat revascularization after PCI: are we reinventing the wheel or redefining Achilles’ heel? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:746-7.

13.

Wells

Shea

O’Connell

, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Health Research Institute; 2014. p 7. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

14.

Jørgensen

Paludan-Müller

Laursen

, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:80.

15.

Altman

. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC eBooks; 1990.

16.

Shamim

Dwivedi

Padhi

. Beyond the funnel plot: the advantages of Doi plots and prediction intervals in meta-analyses. Asian J Psychiatr. 2023;84:103550.

17.

Furuya-Kanamori

Barendregt

Doi

SAR

. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018;16:195-203.

18.

Jacobs

Normand

SLT

Massaro

, et al. Nonemergency PCI at Hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1498-508.

19.

Melberg

Nordrehaug

Nilsen

. A comparison of the health status after percutaneous coronary intervention at a hospital with and without on-site cardiac surgical backup: a randomized trial in nonemergent patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:235-43.

20.

Aversano

Lemmon

Liu

; Atlantic CPORT Investigators. Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1792-802.

21.

Wharton

Jr Grines

Turco

, et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1943-50.

22.

Carlsson

James

Ståhle

Höfer

Lagerqvist

. Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby. Heart. 2007;93:335-8.

23.

Hannan

Zhong

, et al. Treatment of coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007097.

24.

Hannan

Zhong

Racz

, et al. Outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the New York State experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:519-27.

25.

Pride

Canto

Frederick

Gibson

; NRMI Investigators. Outcomes among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting to interventional hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:574-82.

26.

Legutko

Siudak

Bartuś

, et al. Similar outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of presence of cardiac surgery on-site. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72:949-53.

27.

Kim

, et al. AS-012 clinical outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarctions in hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:6A.

28.

Loubeyre

Morice

Berzin

, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery following coronary angioplasty and stenting: results of a French multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47:441-8.

29.

Peels

de Swart

Ploeg

, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1353-8.

30.

Koolen

Mol

Rahel

, et al. Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup. Neth Heart J. 2016;24:581-8.

31.

Akasaka

Hokimoto

Sueta

, et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup. J Cardiol. 2017;69:103-9.

32.

Wennberg

Lucas

Siewers

Kellett

Malenka

. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2004;292:1961-8.

33.

Frutkin

Mehta

Patel

, et al. Outcomes of 1,090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:53-7.

34.

Akasaka

Hokimoto

Tabata

, et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:135.

35.

Singh

Bedi

, et al. Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention with and without on-site surgical backup: a meta-analysis. Am J Ther. 2011;18:e22-8.

36.

Simard

Hibbert

Pourdjabbar

, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with or without on-site coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:197-204.

37.

Michalis

Stroumbis

Pappas

, et al. Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study). Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1954-9.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

0.04 MB

0.03 MB

0.02 MB

0.04 MB

0.05 MB

0.04 MB

0.05 MB

0.04 MB

Clinical Outcomes of PCI in Hospitals With or Without Surgical Backup: A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material