We aimed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value after incorporation of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) into the 10-year pool cohort equation (PCE) risk model in patients with multiple risk factors (MRFs). A total of 4332 MRFs patients were divided into 2 groups as ABI ≤.9 or >.9. The primary outcome was hard cardiovascular events (hCVE: including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke) over a median follow-up of 36 months. The Cox proportional hazards survival model, C-statistic, and net reclassification indices (NRI) were used. The occurrence of the primary outcome in the ABI ≤.9 group (3.7%) was significantly greater than in the ABI > .9 group (1.3%), P < .001. ABI is an independent predictor of hCVE in addition to the variables in the standard risk model (age, gender, and smoking status). ABI modestly improved the C-index when added to the PCE risk model (PCE .70 vs ABI+PCE .74). The addition of ABI to the PCE risk model did not significantly improve the classification of patients (NRI -.029; 95% CI: −.215 to .130). Despite ABI being one of the independent predictors of hCVE, integration of ABI into the PCE model did not improve the efficacy of risk reclassification in patients with MRFs.
Ankle Brachial IndexCFowkesFGMurrayGD, et al.Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:197-208.
2.
ConroyRMPyoralaKFitzgeraldAP, et al.Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:987-1003.
3.
D’Agostino RBSVasanRSPencinaMJ, et al.General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743-753.
4.
GoffDCJrLloyd-JonesDMBennettG, et al.2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49-S73.
5.
Hippisley-CoxJCouplandCBrindleP. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2099.
6.
KuragaichiTKataokaYMiyakoshiC, et al.External validation of pooled cohort equations using systolic blood pressure intervention trial data. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:271.
7.
MoraSWengerNKCookNR, et al.Evaluation of the pooled cohort risk equations for cardiovascular risk prediction in a multiethnic cohort from the women’s health initiative. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1231-1240.
8.
NannaMGPetersonEDWojdylaD, et al.The accuracy of cardiovascular pooled cohort risk estimates in U.S. Older Adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1701-1708.
9.
JiangYMaRGuoH, et al.External validation of three atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk equations in rural areas of Xinjiang, China. BMC Publ Health. 2020;20:1471.
10.
LiuXShenPZhangD, et al.Evaluation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk prediction models in China: Results From the CHERRY Study. JACC (J Am Coll Cardiol): Asia. 2022;2:33-43.
11.
ChiaYCLimHMChingSM. Validation of the pooled cohort risk score in an Asian population - a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:163.
12.
PolakJFPencinaMJPencinaKM, et al.Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:213-221.
13.
YingchoncharoenTLimpijankitTJongjirasiriS, et al.Arterial stiffness contributes to coronary artery disease risk prediction beyond the traditional risk score (RAMA-EGAT score). Heart Asia. 2012;4:77-82.
14.
ForesRAlzamoraMTPeraGBaena-DíezJMMundet-TuduriXToránP. Contribution of the ankle-brachial index to improve the prediction of coronary risk: the ARTPER cohort. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191283.
15.
FowkesFGMurrayGDButcherI, et al.Development and validation of an ankle brachial index risk model for the prediction of cardiovascular events. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21:310-320.
16.
WangFMYangCBallewSH, et al.Ankle-brachial index and subsequent risk of incident and recurrent cardiovascular events in older adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Atherosclerosis. 2021;336:39-47.
17.
Gerhard-HermanMDGornikHLBarrettC, et al.2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1465-1508.
18.
AlahdabFWangATElraiyahTA, et al.A systematic review for the screening for peripheral arterial disease in asymptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:42S-53S.
19.
PhrommintikulAKrittayaphongRWongcharoenW, et al.Management of atherosclerosis risk factors for patients at high cardiovascular risk in real-world practice: a multicentre study. Singap Med J. 2017;58:535-542.
20.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerM, et al.The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453-1457.
21.
ArnettDKBlumenthalRSAlbertMA, et al.2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596-e646.
22.
LeeJYLeeSWLeeWS, et al.Prevalence and clinical implications of newly revealed, asymptomatic abnormal ankle-brachial index in patients with significant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1303-1313.
23.
MiuraTMinamisawaMUekiY, et al.Impressive predictive value of ankle-brachial index for very long-term outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: IMPACT-ABI study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177609.
24.
MurabitoJMEvansJCLarsonMG, et al.The ankle-brachial index in the elderly and risk of stroke, coronary disease, and death: the Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1939-1942.
25.
PrasadaSShahSJMichosEDPolakJFGreenlandP. Ankle-brachial index and incident heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Vasc Med. 2019;24:501-510.
26.
AbouhamdaAAlturkstaniMJanY. Lower sensitivity of ankle-brachial index measurements among people suffering with diabetes-associated vascular disorders: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119835038.
27.
HyunSForbangNIAllisonMADenenbergJOCriquiMHIxJH. Ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, and cardiovascular mortality in persons with and without diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:390-395.
28.
AbuRahmaAFAdamsEAbuRahmaJ, et al.Critical analysis and limitations of resting ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients and the role of diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:937-945.
29.
Alves-CabratosaLComas-CufiMPonjoanA, et al.Levels of ankle-brachial index and the risk of diabetes mellitus complications. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8: e000977.
30.
ArroyoDBetriuAVallsJ, et al.Factors influencing pathological ankle-brachial index values along the chronic kidney disease spectrum: the NEFRONA study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:513-520.
31.
AllisonMAHiattWRHirschATCollJRCriquiMH. A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity and lower quality of life. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1292-1298.
32.
MuntnerPColantonioLDCushmanM, et al.Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations. JAMA. 2014;311:1406-1415.
33.
ZhangZGillespieCBowmanBYangQ. Prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease mortality in a nationally representative cohort using a set of risk factors from pooled cohort risk equations. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175822.
34.
DeFilippisAPYoungRMcEvoyJW, et al.Risk score overestimation: the impact of individual cardiovascular risk factors and preventive therapies on the performance of the American Heart Association-American College of Cardiology-Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk score in a modern multi-ethnic cohort. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:598-608.
35.
DeFilippisAPYoungRCarrubbaCJ, et al.An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:266-275.
36.
JungKJJangYOhDJ, et al.The ACC/AHA 2013 pooled cohort equations compared to a Korean Risk Prediction Model for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242:367-375.
37.
RidkerPMCookNR. The Pooled Cohort equations 3 years on: building a stronger foundation. Circulation. 2016;134:1789-1791.
38.
JinatongthaiPDongtaiWAonsuebsaiB, et al.Validation of The Pooled Cohort Risk Score and the Thai CV Risk Score For Atherosclerosis-Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk Prediction at Warinchamrab Hospital. Thai Bullet Pharmaceut Sci. 2021;16.
39.
YeboahJPolonskyTSYoungR, et al.Utility of nontraditional risk markers in individuals ineligible for statin therapy according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Guidelines. Circulation. 2015;132:916-922.
40.
MurphyTPDhanganaRPencinaMJD’AgostinoRB. Ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular risk prediction: an analysis of 11, 594 individuals with 10-year follow-up. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:160-167.
41.
YeboahJYoungRMcClellandRL, et al.Utility of nontraditional risk markers in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:139-147.
42.
CookNR. Quantifying the added value of new biomarkers: how and how not. Diagn Progn Res. 2018;2:14.
43.
CookNRDemlerOVPaynterNP. Clinical risk reclassification at 10 years. Stat Med. 2017;36:4498-4502.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
