The effect of the contrast agent iohexol on reference vessel size in patients with proximal left anterior descending disease is unknown. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed in 15 patients with atherosclerotic disease of the proximal left anterior descending. Mean proximal reference vessel diameter was 2.95 ± 0.59 mm with quantitative coronary angiography and 4.65 ± 0.66 mm with intravascular ultrasound (P < .05). Intracoronary injection of iohexol resulted in a significant decrease in intravascular ultrasound-measured proximal reference vessel diameter from 4.65 ± 0.66 mm to 4.47 ± 0.68 mm (P = .002). Vasoconstrictive response to iohexol in the proximal reference vessel ranged from −0.04 mm to 0.5 mm with a mean of 0.18 ± 0.16 mm. This study shows that iohexol can cause significant vasoconstriction of the proximal reference vessel in patients with severe disease involving the proximal left anterior descending.
Okabe T., Mintz GS, Buch AN, et al. Intravascular ultrasound parameters associated with stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent deployment. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100: 615-620.
2.
Fujii K., Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:995-998.
3.
Cheneau E., Leborgne L., Mintz GS, et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis: results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2003;108:43-47.
4.
Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong ATCoronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 2006 ;354:483-495.
5.
Moussa I., Kobayashi Y., Adamian M., et al. Characteristics of patients with a large discrepancy in coronary artery diameter between quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound . Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:294-296.
6.
Porter TR, Sears T., Xie F., et al. Intravascular ultrasound study of angiographically mildly diseased coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 ;22:1858-1865.
7.
Hoffmann R., Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Overestimation of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (compared with intravascular ultrasound) in stented lesions . Am J Cardiol. 1997;80: 1277-1281.
8.
Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, et al. Comparison of coronary plaque rupture between stable angina and acute myocardial infarction: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study in 235 patients. Circulation. 2004;110:928-933.
9.
O'Keefe JH Jr, Kreamer TR, Jones PG, et al. Isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting versus left internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 1999;100:11114-11118.
10.
Kurbaan AS, Bowker TJ, Rickards AFDifferential restenosis rate of individual coronary artery sites after multivessel angioplasty: implications for revascularization strategy. CABRI Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation. Am Heart J. 1998;135:703-708.
11.
Dangas G., Ellis SG, Shlofmitz R., et al. Outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1186-1192.
12.
Morcos SK, Dawson P., Pearson JD, et al. The haemodynamic effects of iodinated water soluble radiographic contrast media: a review. Eur J Radiol. 1998 ;29:31-46.
13.
Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 ;37:1478-1492.
14.
de Bruyne B. , Pijls NH, Barbato E., et al. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation . 2003;107:1877-1883.
15.
Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, van der Wall EEIntravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP study). Circulation. 2003;107:62-67.
16.
Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A., Hayase M., et al. Final results of the can routine ultrasound influence stent expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation. 2000;102:523-530.
17.
Schiele F., Meneveau N., Vuillemenot A., et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies-with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. RESIST Study Group. Restenosis after Ivus guided Stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol . 1998;32:320-328.
18.
Mudra H., di Mario C., de Jaegere P., et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS study). Circulation. 2001;104:1343-1349.
19.
Limbruno U. , Petronio AS, Amoroso G., et al. The impact of coronary artery disease on the coronary vasomotor response to nonionic contrast media. Circulation. 2000; 101:491-497.
20.
Karstoft J. , Baath L., Jansen I., Edvinsson L.Contrast medium-induced vasoconstrictions. An investigation of the vasoconstrictive action of iohexol in isolated rabbit coronary arteries. Acta Radiol. 1995;36:198-203.
21.
Pijls NH, de Bruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334: 1703-1708.
22.
Tatineni S. , Kern MJ, Deligonul U., Aguirre F.The effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary hyperemia in patients during coronary angiography . Am Heart J. 1992;123:621-627.
