Esophageal function tests (esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring) are essential to diagnose benign esophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and achalasia. Unfortunately, these tests are rarely taught during medical school or surgical training, so that surgeons who treat these diseases must rely on the interpretation and conclusions made by other physicians, mostly gastroenterologists, just reading the report without looking at the tracings themselves. Potentially, this approach may lead to poor outcomes or even malpractice.
PopaCSchlangerDAiolfiA, et al.Education and training of surgical residents in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a European survey. Updates Surg. 2025;78:55-62. doi:10.1007/s13304-025-02362-3.
4.
KraftCKathpaliaPBaumgardnerJMPandolfinoJESewellJL. How to incorporate esophageal manometry teaching in your fellowship program. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(8):2120-2123. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.024.
5.
YadlapatiRKeswaniRNCiolinoJD, et al.A system to assess the competency for interpretation of esophageal manometry identifies variation in learning curves. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(11):1708-1714.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.024.
6.
KahrilasPJBredenoordAJFoxM, et al.The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160-174. doi:10.1111/nmo.12477.
7.
HerbellaFAMPattiMGFilhoRM, et al.How changes in treatment guidelines affect the standard of care: ethical opinions using the Chicago 4.0 classification for esophageal motility disorders as example. Foregut. 2022;2(2):111-115. doi:10.1177/26345161221081038.
8.
HerbellaFAMPattiMGSchlottmannF. Esophageal high-resolution manometry demands visual interpretation in addition to mathematical software-based analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):164. doi:10.1007/s00423-023-02909-1.
9.
De VaultKCastellJCastellD. How many swallows are required to establish reliable esophageal peristaltic parameters in normal subjects? An on-line computer analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987;82(8):754-757.
10.
HerbellaFAMKatayamaRCPattiMGSchlottmannF. The rise and fall of esophageal function tests. Comment on: Taft et al. Initial assessment of medical post-traumatic stress among patients with chronic esophageal diseases. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2023;36:e14617. doi:10.1111/nmo.14617.
11.
RomanSKahrilasPJBorisLBidariKLugerDPandolfinoJE. High-resolution manometry studies are frequently imperfect but usually still interpretable. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(12):1050-1055. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.007.
12.
HernandezJCRatuapliSKBurdickGEDibaiseJKCrowellMD. Interrater and intrarater agreement of the Chicago classification of achalasia subtypes using high-resolution esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):207-214. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.353.
13.
HerbellaFAMPattiMG. Double-checking esophageal function tests. Comment on: Carlson et al. evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(5):e14293. doi:10.1111/nmo.14293.
14.
KoyaDLAgrawalAFreemanJECastellDO. Impedance detected abnormal bolus transit in patients with normal esophageal manometry. Sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality?Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(6):563-569. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00854.x.
15.
CarlsonDABaumannAJDonnanENKrauseAKouWPandolfinoJE. Evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(10):e14116. doi:10.1111/nmo.14116.
16.
CohenDLGhantusJTomeR, et al.Assessment of esophageal emptying in patients with dysphagia: differences between high-resolution impedance manometry and timed barium Esophagram. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2025;88(2):89-95. doi:10.51821/88.1.13772.
