Since the War on Poverty in the 1960s, the U.S. social safety net has shifted away from direct cash assistance for the lowest-income households and toward tax-based transfers targeted at working families with children. Previous research has assessed this shift by evaluating its effect on the national poverty rate. Doing so, however, overlooks how it may also have led to increased inequality among low-income households. We apply a decomposition framework to measure how changes in taxes/transfers and composition have affected trends in inequality below the poverty line from 1967 to 2019. Income inequality among the poorest households has been volatile since the 1960s, and changes to the American welfare state played a decisive role in expanding or reducing inequality below the poverty line. Unlike in previous decades, after the mid-1990s, the policies that most reduced poverty were also those that most increased inequality among the poor. These findings challenge standard theories regarding the effectiveness of income transfers in reducing poverty by revealing that recent state-led antipoverty efforts have placed the near poor and the deeply poor on divergent paths.
BaileyMartha J.DanzigerSheldon, eds. 2013. Legacies of the War on Poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
BeaudryPaulGreenDavid A.SandBenjamin M.2016. “The Great Reversal in the Demand for Skill and Cognitive Tasks.” Journal of Labor Economics34(S1):S199–S247.
4.
BergerLawrence M.CarlsonMarcia J. 2020. “Family Policy and Complex Contemporary Families: A Decade in Review and Implications for the Next Decade of Research and Policy Practice.” Journal of Marriage and Family82(1):478–507.
5.
BitlerMarianneHoynesHilary W.2010. The State of the Safety Net in the Post-Welfare Reform Era. No. w16504, National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BlankRebecca M. 2002. “Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States.” Journal of Economic Literature40(4):1105–66.
7.
BlankRebecca. 2018. It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty, updated ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BradyDavidFinniganRyan M.HübgenSabine. 2017. “Rethinking the Risks of Poverty: A Framework for Analyzing Prevalences and Penalties.” American Journal of Sociology123(3):740–86.
9.
BradyDavidParolinZachary. 2020. “The Levels and Trends in Deep and Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1993–2016.” Demography57(6):2337–60.
10.
BrauerCarl. 1982. “Kennedy, Johnson, and the War on Poverty.” The Journal of American History69:98–119.
11.
BruchSarah K.GordonColin. 2022. “States of Welfare: Decentralization and Its Consequences in US Social Policy.” Pp. 352–68 in Handbook on Urban Social Policies: International Perspectives on Multilevel Governance and Local Welfare, edited by KazepovY.BarberisE.CuccaR.MoccaE. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
12.
BruchSarah K.van der NaaldJosephGornickJanet C.2023. “Poverty Reduction through Federal and State Policy Mechanisms: Variation over Time and across the US States.” Social Service Review97(2):270–319.
13.
CappelliPeter H. 2015. “Skill Gaps, Skill Shortages, and Skill Mismatches: Evidence and Arguments for the United States.” ILR Review68(2):251–90.
CollyerSophieHarrisDavidWimerChristopher. 2019. “Left Behind: The One-Third of Children in Families Who Earn Too Little to Get the Full Child Tax Credit.” Poverty & Social Policy Brief 3(6). New York: Columbia University Center on Poverty and Social Policy.
18.
Congressional Research Service. 2020. “Real Wage Trends, 1979 to 2019.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
19.
Congressional Research Service. 2021. “The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC): How It Works and Who Receives It.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
CooperMariannePughAllison J.2020. “Families across the Income Spectrum: A Decade in Review.” Journal of Marriage and Family82(1):272–99.
21.
DeatonAngus. 2018. “The US Can No Longer Hide from its Deep Poverty Problem.” The New York Times, January24.
22.
DeParleJason. 2005. American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and a Nation’s Drive to End Welfare. New York: Penguin.
23.
DesmondMatthew. 2023. Poverty, by America. New York: Crown.
24.
DesmondMatthewWesternBruce. 2018. “Poverty in America: New Directions and Debates.” Annual Review of Sociology44:1, 305–18.
25.
EdinKathrynShaeferH. Luke. 2015. $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
26.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
FarberHenryHerbstDanielKuziemkoIlyanaNaiduSuresh. 2018. “Unions and Inequality over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 24587.
28.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRodgersRenaeRugglesStevenWarrenJ. RobertWestberryMichael. 2022. “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series.” Current Population Survey: Version 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS (https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V10.0).
29.
FosterJamesGreerJoelThorbeckeErik. 2010. “The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: 25 Years Later.” Journal of Economic Inequality8:491–524 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9136-1).
FoxLianaWimerChristopherGarfinkelIrwinKaushalNeerajWaldfogelJane. 2015. “Waging War on Poverty: Poverty Trends Using a Historical Supplemental Poverty Measure.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34(3):567–92.
32.
FryRichardCilluffoAnthony. 2019. “A Rising Share of Undergraduates Are from Poor Families, Especially at Less Selective Colleges.” Pew Research Center.
33.
FurstenbergFrank. 2014. “Fifty Years of Family Change: From Consensus to Complexity.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science654:12–30.
34.
GilensMartin. 2009. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
GilletteMichael L. 2010. Launching the War on Poverty: An Oral History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
GoldinJacobMichelmoreKatherine. 2020. “Who Benefits From the Child Tax Credit?” No. w27940, National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
HavemanRobertBlankRebeccaMoffittRobertSmeedingTimothyWallaceGeoffrey. 2015. “The War on Poverty: Measurement, Trends, and Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34(3):593–638.
38.
HowardChristopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
HowellDavid R.KallebergArne L.2019. “Declining Job Quality in the United States: Explanations and Evidence.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences5(4):1–53.
40.
HoynesHilary. 2019. “The Earned Income Tax Credit.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science686(1):180–203.
KorpiWalterPalmeJoakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review63(5):661–87 (https://doi.org/10.2307/2657333).
43.
LichterDaniel T.JayakodyRukamalie. 2002. “Welfare Reform: How Do We Measure Success?”Annual Review of Sociology28(1):117–41.
44.
LudwigJensDuncanGreg J.GennetianLisa A.KatzLawrence F.KesslerRonald C.KlingJeffrey R.SanbonmatsuLisa. 2012. “Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults.” Science337(6101):1505–10.
45.
McLanahanSara. 2004. “Diverging Destinies: How Children Are Faring under the Second Demographic Transition.” Demography41(4):607–27.
46.
MettlerSuzanne. 2018. The Government-Citizen Disconnect. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
MeyerBruce D.MokWallace K. C.SullivanJames X.2009. “The Under-Reporting of Transfers in Household Surveys: Its Nature and Consequences.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 15181 (https://doi.org/10.3386/w15181).
48.
MeyerBruce D.WuDerek. 2018. “The Poverty Reduction of Social Security and Means-Tested Transfers.” ILR Review71(5):1106–53.
49.
MoffittRobert A. 2015. “The Deserving Poor, the Family, and the US Welfare System.” Demography52(3):729–49.
50.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. “A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty.” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (https://doi.org/10.17226/25246).
51.
OkunArthur. [1975] 2005. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52.
PacJessicaGarfinkelIrwinKaushalNeerajNamJaehyunNolanLauraWaldfogelJaneWimerChristopher. 2020. “Reducing Poverty among Children: Evidence from State Policy Simulations.” Children and Youth Services Review115 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105030).
53.
ParolinZachary. 2021. “Decomposing the Decline of Cash Assistance in the United States, 1993 to 2016.” Demography58(3):1119–41 (https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9157471).
54.
ParolinZachary. 2023. Poverty in the Pandemic: Policy Lessons from COVID-19. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55.
ParolinZacharyGornickJanet C.2021. “Pathways toward Inclusive Income Growth: A Comparative Decomposition of National Growth Profiles.” American Sociological Review86(6):1131–63.
56.
PiersonPaul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
PikettyThomasSaezEmmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics118(1):1–41.
58.
powelljohn a.MenendianStephenAkeWendy. 2019. Targeted Universalism: Policy and Practice. Berkeley, CA: Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society.
59.
RainwaterLeeSmeedingTimothy M. 2003. Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America’s Children in Comparative Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation (http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610444620).
60.
RothbaumJonathanBeeAdam. 2021. “Coronavirus Infects Surveys, Too: Survey Nonresponse Bias and the Coronavirus Pandemic.” U.S. Census Bureau, Working Paper 2020-10.
61.
RubinBeth A.WrightJames D.DevineJoel A.1992. “Unhousing the Urban Poor: The Reagan Legacy.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare19(1) (https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.2013).
SchwartzAlex. 2021. Housing Policy in the United States, 3rd ed.London, UK: Routledge.
64.
SkocpolTheda. [1995] 2020. Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
SteenslandBrian. 2008. The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
TachLauraEdinKathryn. 2017. “The Social Safety Net after Welfare Reform: Recent Developments and Consequences for Household Dynamics.” Annual Review of Sociology43:541–61.
VallasSteven P. 2019. “Platform Capitalism: What’s at Stake for Workers?” New Labor Forum28(1):48–59.
69.
VolschoThomas W.KellyNathan J.2012. “The Rise of the Super-Rich: Power Resources, Taxes, Financial Markets, and the Dynamics of the Top 1 Percent, 1949 to 2008.” American Sociological Review77(5):679–99.
70.
WakefieldSaraUggenChristopher. 2010. “Incarceration and Stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology36:387–406.
71.
WeaverR. Kent. 2000. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
WesternBruceBloomeDeirdrePercheskiChristine. 2008. “Inequality among American Families with Children, 1975 to 2005.” American Sociological Review73(6):903–20.
74.
WesternBruceRosenfeldJake. 2011. “Unions, Norms, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality.” American Sociological Review76(4):513–37.
75.
WettsRachelWillerRobb. 2018. “Privilege on the Precipice: Perceived Racial Status Threats Lead White Americans to Oppose Welfare Programs.” Social Forces97(2):793–822.
76.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
WimerChristopherParolinZacharyFentonAnnyFoxLianaJencksChristopher. 2020. “The Direct Effect of Taxes and Transfers on Changes in the US Income Distribution, 1967–2015.” Demography57(5):1833–51.
78.
ZelizerJulian. 2015. The Fierce Urgency of Now: Lyndon Johnson, Congress, and the Battle for the Great Society. New York: Penguin.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
