The theory of statistical discrimination is a dominant social scientific framework for understanding discrimination in labor markets. To date, the literature has treated this theory as a model that merely explains employer behavior. This article contends that the idea of statistical discrimination, rather than simply providing an explanation, can lead people to view social stereotyping as useful and acceptable and thus help rationalize and justify discriminatory decisions. A preregistered survey experiment with more than 2,000 participants who had managerial experience shows that exposure to statistical discrimination theory strengthened people’s belief in the accuracy of stereotypes, their acceptance of stereotyping, and the extent to which they engaged in gender discrimination in a hiring simulation. Reading a critical commentary on the theory mitigated these effects. These findings imply that theories of discrimination, and the language associated with them, can rationalize—or challenge the rationality of—stereotypes and discrimination and, as a result, shape the attitudes and actions of decision-makers in labor markets.
AignerDennis J.CainGlen G.1977. “Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review30(2):175–87.
2.
AltonjiJoseph G.PierretCharles R.2001. “Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics116(1):313–50.
3.
ArrowKenneth. 1973. “The Theory of Discrimination.” Pp. 3–33 in Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by AshenfelterO.ReesA.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AshenfelterOrleyOaxacaRonald. 1987. “The Economics of Discrimination: Economists Enter the Courtroom.”The American Economic Review77(2):321–25.
BabbSarah. 2004. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BaronJames N.BielbyWilliam T.1980. “Bringing the Firms Back in: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.”American Sociological Review45(5):737–65.
9.
BeckerGary. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BergerJosephFişekM. HamitNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
11.
BermanElizabeth Popp. 2017. “From Economic to Social Regulation: How the Deregulatory Moment Strengthened Economists’ Policy Position.”History of Political Economy49(Supplement):187–212.
12.
BermanElizabeth Popp. Forthcoming. “The Preferences of Economists.” In Thinking Like an Economist: How Economics Became the Language of U.S. Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
BertrandMarianneDufloEsther. 2016. Field Experiments on Discrimination. NBER Working Paper 22014. National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.”American Journal of Sociology91(4):759–99.
15.
BlythMark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BohnetIris. 2016. What Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BohrenJ. AislinnHaggagKareemImasAlexPopeDevin G.2019. “Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination.” NBER Working Paper 25935. National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago, IL.
18.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation.”American Sociological Review62(3):465–80.
19.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardoDietrichDavid. 2011. “The Sweet Enchantment of Color-Blind Racism in Obamerica.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634(1):190–206.
20.
BracicAna. 2018. “For Better Science: The Benefits of Community Engagement in Research.”PS: Political Science & Politics51(3):550–53.
21.
BrescollVictoriaLaFranceMarianne. 2004. “The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences.”Psychological Science15(8):515–20.
22.
BrissetNicolas. 2016. “Economics Is Not Always Performative: Some Limits for Performativity.”Journal of Economic Methodology23(2):160–84.
CarterJason D.HallJudith A.CarneyDana R.RosipJanelle C.2006. “Individual Differences in the Acceptance of Stereotyping.”Journal of Research in Personality40(6):1103–18.
26.
CastillaEmilio J.2008. “Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers.”American Journal of Sociology113(6):1479–526.
27.
CastillaEmilio J.BenardStephen. 2010. “The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly55(4):543–676.
28.
ChandlerJesseMuellerPamPaolacciGabriele. 2014. “Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and Solutions for Behavioral Researchers.”Behavior Research Methods46:112–30.
29.
ChandlerJessePaolacciGabrielePeerEyalMuellerPamRatliffKate A.2015. “Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes.”Psychological Science26(7):1131–39.
30.
CharlesKerwin KofiGuryanJonathan. 2011. “Studying Discrimination: Fundamental Challenges and Recent Progress.”Annual Review of Economics3(1):479–511.
31.
CharlesKerwin KofiGuryanJonathan. 2016. “Taste-Based Discrimination.” Pp. 1–8 in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
CharnessGaryGneezyUriKuhnMichael A.2012. “Experimental Methods: Between-Subject and Within-Subject Design.”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization81(1):1–8.
33.
Chassonnery-ZaïgoucheCléo. 2020. “How Economists Entered the ‘Numbers Game’: Measuring Discrimination in the U.S. Courtrooms, 1971–1989.”Journal of the History of Economic Thought42(2):229–59.
CoffmanKatherine B.ExleyChristine L.NiederleMuriel. Forthcoming. “The Role of Beliefs in Driving Gender Discrimination.”Management Science.
36.
CornellBradfordWelchIvo. 1996. “Culture, Information, and Screening Discrimination.”Journal of Political Economy104(3):542–71.
37.
CorrellShelley J.2017. “SWS 2016 Feminist Lecture: Reducing Gender Biases in Modern Workplaces: A Small Wins Approach to Organizational Change.”Gender & Society31(6):725–50.
38.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephen. 2006. “Biased Estimators? Comparing Status and Statistical Theories of Gender Discrimination.” Pp. 89–116 in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 23, edited by ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(06)23004-2).
39.
CowenTylerTabarrokAlex. 2015. Modern Principles of Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
40.
CrandallChristian S.EshlemanAmy. 2003. “A Justification-Suppression Model of the Expression and Experience of Prejudice.”Psychological Bulletin129(3):414–46.
41.
DobbinFrank. 1994a. “Cultural Models of Organization: The Social Construction of Rational Organizing Principles.” Pp. 117–41 in The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives, edited by CraneD.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42.
DobbinFrank. 1994b. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
DobbinFrank. 2001. “Do the Social Sciences Shape Corporate Anti-Discrimination Practice: The United States and France.”Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal23(3):829–64.
44.
DobbinFrank. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
DobbinFrankJungJiwook. 2010. “The Misapplication of Mr. Michael Jensen: How Agency Theory Brought Down the Economy and Why It Might Again.”Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis (Research in the Sociology of Organizations)30B:29–64.
46.
EnglandPaula. 1994. “Neoclassical Economists’ Theories of Discrimination.” Pp. 59–70 in Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
47.
EnglandPaulaLewinPeter. 1989. “Economic and Sociological Views of Discrimination in Labor Markets: Persistence or Demise?”Sociological Spectrum9(3):239–57.
48.
EwensMichaelTomlinBryanWangLiang Choon. 2013. “Statistical Discrimination or Prejudice? A Large Sample Field Experiment.”The Review of Economics and Statistics96(1):119–34.
49.
FelinTeppoFossNicolai J.2009. “Performativity of Theory, Arbitrary Conventions, and Possible Worlds: A Reality Check.”Organization Science20(3):676–78.
50.
FernandezRoberto M.GreenbergJason. 2013. “Race, Network Hiring, and Statistical Discrimination.” Pp. 81–102 in Networks, Work and Inequality, Vol. 24, Research in the Sociology of Work, edited by SteveM.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
51.
FerraroFabrizioPfefferJeffreySuttonRobert I.2005. “Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling.”Academy of Management Review30(1):8–24.
52.
FerraroFabrizioPfefferJeffreySuttonRobert I.2009. “How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009).”Organization Science20(3):669–75.
53.
FetterolfJanell C.RudmanLaurie A.2017. “Exposure to Sexual Economics Theory Promotes a Hostile View of Heterosexual Relationships.”Psychology of Women Quarterly41(1):77–88.
54.
FligsteinNeil. 1993. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
FourcadeMarion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
FourcadeMarion. 2016. “Ordinalization: Lewis A. Coser Memorial Award for Theoretical Agenda Setting 2014.”Sociological Theory34(3):175–95.
57.
FourcadeMarionHealyKieran. 2013. “Classification Situations: Life-Chances in the Neoliberal Era.”Accounting, Organizations and Society38(8):559–72.
58.
FourcadeMarionHealyKieran. 2017. “Seeing Like a Market.”Socio-Economic Review15(1):9–29.
59.
FourcadeMarionOllionEtienneAlganYann. 2015. “The Superiority of Economists.”Journal of Economic Perspectives29(1):89–114.
60.
FrankBjörnSchulzeGünther G.2000. “Does Economics Make Citizens Corrupt?”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization43(1):101–13.
GormanElizabeth H.2005. “Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women: Evidence from Law Firms.”American Sociological Review70(4):702–28.
63.
GreenTom L.2012. “Introductory Economics Textbooks: What Do They Teach about Sustainability?”International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education3(2):189–223.
64.
GreenwaldAnthony G.BanajiMahzarin R.1995. “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes.”Psychological Review102(1):4–27.
65.
GuillénMauro F. 1994. Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
GuryanJonathanCharlesKerwin Kofi. 2013. “Taste-Based or Statistical Discrimination: The Economics of Discrimination Returns to Its Roots.”The Economic Journal123(572):F417–32.
67.
HarfordTim. 2008. The Logic of Life: The Rational Economics of an Irrational World. New York: Random House.
68.
HindlianAmandaLawsonSandraBanerjeeSonyaMirabalDeborahShanHuiCampbell-MohnEmma. 2018. “Closing the Gender Gaps: Advancing Women in Corporate America.”Goldman Sachs, Global Markets Institute, New York.
69.
HirschmanDanielBermanElizabeth Popp. 2014. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics.”Socio-Economic Review12(4):779–811.
70.
HirschmanDanielBoskEmily Adlin. 2020. “Standardizing Biases: Selection Devices and the Quantification of Race.”Sociology of Race and Ethnicity6(3):348–64.
71.
HitlinStevenVaiseyStephen. 2013. “The New Sociology of Morality.”Annual Review of Sociology39(1):51–68.
72.
HollisMartin. 1987. The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
JungJiwookDobbinFrank. 2016. “Agency Theory as Prophecy: How Boards, Analysts, and Fund Managers Perform Their Roles.”Seattle University Law Review39(2):291–320.
74.
JungJiwookShinTaekjin. 2019. “Learning Not to Diversify: The Transformation of Graduate Business Education and the Decline of Diversifying Acquisitions.”Administrative Science Quarterly64(2):337–69.
75.
KalevAlexandraDobbinFrankKellyErin. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.”American Sociological Review71(4):589–617.
76.
KiviatBarbara. 2019. “The Moral Limits of Predictive Practices: The Case of Credit-Based Insurance Scores.”American Sociological Review84(6):1134–58.
77.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
KruegerAlan. 2002. “Economic Scene; Sticks and Stones Can Break Bones, but the Wrong Name Can Make a Job Hard to Find.”The New York Times, December12, p. C2.
79.
KulasJohn T.StachowskiAlicia A.2009. “Middle Category Endorsement in Odd-Numbered Likert Response Scales: Associated Item Characteristics, Cognitive Demands, and Preferred Meanings.”Journal of Research in Personality43(3):489–93.
80.
KundaZivaSpencerSteven J.2003. “When Do Stereotypes Come to Mind and When Do They Color Judgment? A Goal-Based Theoretical Framework for Stereotype Activation and Application.”Psychological Bulletin129(4):522–44.
LiJunZhangDennisCuiRuomeng. 2017. “A Better Way to Fight Discrimination in the Sharing Economy.”Harvard Business Review, February27.
83.
LightRyanRoscignoVincent J.KalevAlexandra. 2011. “Racial Discrimination, Interpretation, and Legitimation at Work.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634(1):39–59.
84.
LundbergShelly J.StartzRichard. 1983. “Private Discrimination and Social Intervention in Competitive Labor Markets.”The American Economic Review73(3):340–47.
85.
MackenzieDonald. 2008. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86.
MaitzenStephen. 1991. “The Ethics of Statistical Discrimination.”Social Theory and Practice17(1):23–45.
87.
MarglinStephen A.2008. The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
MasseyDouglasDentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
McCallLeslieBurkDerekLaperrièreMarieRichesonJennifer A.2017. “Exposure to Rising Inequality Shapes Americans’ Opportunity Beliefs and Policy Support.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(36):9593–98.
90.
McCloskeyDonald N.1984. “The Literary Character of Economics.”Daedalus113(3):97–119.
91.
McCloskeyDonald N.1990. “Storytelling in Economics.” Pp. 5–22 in Narrative in Culture, edited by NashC.WarnerM.London, UK: Routledge.
92.
MertonRobert K.1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.”The Antioch Review8(2):193–210.
93.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–63.
94.
MillerDale T.1999. “The Norm of Self-Interest.”American Psychologist54(12):1053–60.
95.
MirowskiPhilipNik-KhahEdward. 2007. “Markets Made Flesh: Performativity, and a Problem in Science Studies, Augmented with Consideration of the FCC Auctions.” Pp. 190–224 in Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzieD.MuniesaF.SiuL.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96.
MossPhilipTillyChris. 2001. Stories Employers Tell: Race, Skill, and Hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
97.
MummoloJonathanPetersonErik. 2019. “Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment.”American Political Science Review113(2):517–29.
98.
National Research Council. 2004. Measuring Racial Discrimination. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
99.
NewmanLeonard S.TanMingxuanCaldwellTracy L.DuffKimberley J.WinerE. Samuel. 2018. “Name Norms: A Guide to Casting Your Next Experiment.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(10):1435–48.
100.
NormanPeter. 2003. “Statistical Discrimination and Efficiency.”The Review of Economic Studies70(3):615–27.
101.
OrneMartin T.1962. “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications.”American Psychologist17(11):776–83.
102.
OyerPaul. 2014. Everything I Ever Needed to Know about Economics I Learned from Online Dating. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
103.
PagerDevah. 2016. “Are Firms That Discriminate More Likely to Go Out of Business?”Sociological Science3:849–59.
104.
PagerDevahKarafinDiana. 2009. “Bayesian Bigot? Statistical Discrimination, Stereotypes, and Employer Decision Making.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science621(1):70–93.
105.
PagerDevahQuillianLincoln. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say versus What They Do.”American Sociological Review70(3):355–80.
106.
PagerDevahShepherdHana. 2008. “The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.”Annual Review of Sociology34(1):181–209.
107.
PalanStefanSchitterChristian. 2018. “Prolific.ac: A Subject Pool for Online Experiments.”Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance17:22–27.
108.
PedullaDavid S.2014. “The Positive Consequences of Negative Stereotypes: Race, Sexual Orientation, and the Job Application Process.”Social Psychology Quarterly77(1):75–94.
109.
PedullaDavid S.2020. Making the Cut: Hiring Decisions, Bias, and the Consequences of Nonstandard, Mismatched, and Precarious Employment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
110.
PeerEyalBrandimarteLauraSamatSonamAcquistiAlessandro. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70:153–63.
111.
PetersenTrondSaportaIshak. 2004. “The Opportunity Structure for Discrimination.”American Journal of Sociology109(4):852–901.
112.
PhelpsEdmund S.1972. “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.”The American Economic Review62(4):659–61.
113.
QuadlinNatasha. 2018. “The Mark of a Woman’s Record: Gender and Academic Performance in Hiring.”American Sociological Review83(2):331–60.
114.
QuillianLincoln. 2006. “New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination.”Annual Review of Sociology32(1):299–328.
115.
QuillianLincolnPagerDevahHexelOleMidtbøenArnfinn H.2017. “Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments Shows No Change in Racial Discrimination in Hiring over Time.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(41):10870–75.
116.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.”American Sociological Review84(1):26–53.
117.
ReskinBarbara. 2012. “The Race Discrimination System.”Annual Review of Sociology38(1):17–35.
118.
RidgewayCecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.”American Sociological Review62(2):218–35.
119.
RidgewayCecilia L.2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.”Journal of Social Issues57(4):637–55.
120.
RidgewayCecilia L.2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
121.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.”Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
122.
RidgewayCecilia L.Smith-LovinLynn. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.”Annual Review of Sociology25(1):191–216.
123.
RissingBen A.CastillaEmilio J.2014. “House of Green Cards: Statistical or Preference-Based Inequality in the Employment of Foreign Nationals.”American Sociological Review79(6):1226–55.
124.
RiveraLauren A.2016. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125.
RiveraLauren A.2020. “Employer Decision Making.”Annual Review of Sociology46(1):215–32.
126.
RiveraLauren A.TilcsikAndrás. 2016. “Class Advantage, Commitment Penalty: The Gendered Effect of Social Class Signals in an Elite Labor Market.”American Sociological Review81(6):1097–1131.
127.
RiveraLauren A.TilcsikAndrás. 2019. “Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation.”American Sociological Review84(2):248–74.
128.
RoscignoVincent J.2007. The Face of Discrimination: How Race and Gender Impact Work and Home Lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
129.
RyanCarey. 2003. “Stereotype Accuracy.”European Review of Social Psychology13(1):75–109.
130.
SchudsonMichael. 1989. “How Culture Works: Perspectives from Media Studies on the Efficacy of Symbols.”Theory and Society18(2):153–80.
131.
ScottW. Richard. 2013. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
132.
SmallMario L.PagerDevah. 2020. “Sociological Perspectives on Racial Discrimination.”Journal of Economic Perspectives34(2):49–67.
133.
SoffenKim. 2016. “The Big Question about Why Police Pull Over so Many Black Drivers.”Washington Post, July8.
134.
StarrSonja B.2014. “Evidence-Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination.”Stanford Law Review66(4):803–72.
135.
StetsJan E.CarterMichael J.2012. “A Theory of the Self for the Sociology of Morality.”American Sociological Review77(1):120–40.
136.
SztompkaPiotr. 1991. Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137.
The Economist. 2014. “(The Right Sort of) Help Wanted.”The Economist, June11.
138.
TurcoCatherine J.2010. “Cultural Foundations of Tokenism: Evidence from the Leveraged Buyout Industry.”American Sociological Review75(6):894–913.
139.
WeberMax. 1905. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.
140.
ZelizerViviana A. Rotman. 1979. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
141.
ZizzoDaniel John. 2010. “Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic Experiments.”Experimental Economics13(1):75–98.
142.
ZuckermanEzra W.2010. “What If We Had Been in Charge? The Sociologist as Builder of Rational Institutions.” Pp. 359–78 in Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the US Financial Crisis. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
