This study contributes to the labor market inequality and organizations literature by investigating the role that government agents play in shaping the employment of immigrants. Using unique data on applications for immigrant permanent labor certification evaluated by U.S. Department of Labor agents, we assess to what extent immigrants of select citizenship groups experience disparities in the labor certification process—one critical stage of the work authorization system leading to the granting of most employment-based green cards. Despite current U.S. laws that forbid discrimination on the basis of nationality, we find that labor certification approvals differ significantly depending on immigrants’ foreign citizenship, even after controlling for key factors. Additionally, because of the U.S. government’s unique process of auditing applications, we are in a rare position to empirically distinguish between statistical and preference-based accounts of labor market discrimination in the labor certification process. In support of the statistical account, we find that certification approvals are equally likely for immigrant workers from the vast majority of citizenship groups when agents review audited applications with detailed employment information. This article concludes by discussing the implications of our results for addressing disparities in the employment of foreign nationals.
AignerDennis J.CainGlen G.1977. “Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review30(2):175–87.
2.
AlbaRichard D.NeeVictor G.2005. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AltonjiJoseph G.PierretCharles R.2001. “Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination.” Quarterly Journal of Economics116(1):313–50.
4.
ArrowKenneth J.1973. “The Theory of Discrimination.” Pp. 3–33 in Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by AshenfelterO.ReesA.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BakalianAnnyBozorgmehrMedhi. 2009. Backlash 9/11: Middle Eastern and Muslim Americans Respond, 1st ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
6.
BarnettWilliam P.BaronJames N.StuartToby E.2000. “Avenues of Attainment: Occupational Demography and Organizational Careers in the California Civil Service.” American Journal of Sociology106(1):88–144.
7.
BaronJames N.BielbyWilliam T.1980. “Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.” American Sociological Review45(5):737–65.
8.
BeckerGary S.1957. The Economics of Discrimination, 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BergerJoseph M.HamitFisekNormanRobert Z.ZelditchMorrisJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
10.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review94(4):991–1013.
11.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology91(4):759–99.
12.
BlankRebecca M.DabadyMarilynCitroConstance F.2004. Measuring Racial Discrimination. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
13.
BorjasGeorge J.1987. “Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.” American Economic Review77(4):531–53.
14.
BorjasGeorge J.1994. “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature32(4):1667–1717.
15.
BrantonRegina P.DunawayJohanna. 2009. “Spatial Proximity to the US-Mexico Border and Local News Coverage of Immigration Issues.” Political Research Quarterly62(2):289–302.
16.
BurgessLorna R.2005. “How the PERM Labor Certification Process Evolved.” Pp. 1–12 in The David Stanton Manual on Labor Certification, 3rd ed., edited by GonzalezJ.GreenfieldE.Washington, DC: American Immigration Lawyers Association Publications.
17.
BurnsPeterGimpelJames G.2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly115(2):201–225.
18.
CalavitaKitty. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the I.N.S. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.
19.
CastillaEmilio J.2005. “Social Networks and Employee Performance in a Call Center.” American Journal of Sociology110(5):1243–83.
20.
CastillaEmilio J.2008. “Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers.” American Journal of Sociology113(6):1479–526.
21.
CastillaEmilio J.2011. “Bringing Managers Back In: Managerial Influences on Workplace Inequality.” American Sociological Review76(5):667–94.
22.
CastillaEmilio J.SteveBenard. 2010. “The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly55(4):543–76.
23.
ChavezLeo R.2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24.
ChiswickBarry R.1978. “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.” Journal of Political Economy86(5):897–921.
25.
“Civil Rights Act of 1964.”1964. Public Law 88-352. 78 Stat. 241. 88th Congress.
26.
CohenLisa E.BroschakJoseph P.HavemanHeather A.1998. “And Then There Were More? The Effects of Organizational Sex Composition on Hiring and Promotion.” American Sociological Review63(5):711–27.
27.
CookRyan C.2005. “PERM Flowchart.” Pp. 232–35 in The David Stanton Manual on Labor Certification, 3rd ed., edited by GonzalezJ.GreenfieldE.Washington, DC: American Immigration Lawyers Association Publications.
28.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephen. 2006. “Biased Estimators? Comparing Status and Statistical Theories of Gender Discrimination.” Pp. 89–116 in Social Psychology of the Workplace (Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 23), edited by ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J.New York: Elsevier Science.
29.
DavisKenneth C.1969. Discretionary Justice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
30.
DenckerJohn C.2008. “Corporate Restructuring and Sex Differences in Managerial Promotion.” American Sociological Review73(3):455–76.
31.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
32.
DobbinFrank R.SuttonFrank R.1998. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology104(2):441–76.
33.
DonatoKatharine M.ArmentaAmada. 2011. “What We Know About Unauthorized Migration.” Annual Review of Sociology37(1):529–43.
34.
EdelmanLauren B.SuchmanMark C.1997. “The Legal Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology23:479–515.
EnglandPaula S.1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine Transaction Publishers.
37.
FernandezRoberto M.ColetteFriedrich. 2011. “Gender Sorting at the Application Interface.” Industrial Relations50(4):591–609.
38.
FernandezRoberto M.GreenbergJason. 2013. “Race, Gender and Statistical Discrimination.” Research in the Sociology of Work24:81–102.
39.
FernandezRoberto M.SosaLourdes M.2005. “Gendering the Job: Networks and Recruitment at a Call Center.” American Journal of Sociology111(3):859–904.
40.
FernandezRoberto M.NancyWeinberg. 1997. “Sifting and Sorting: Personal Contacts and Hiring in a Retail Bank.” American Sociological Review62(6):883–902.
41.
Fernandez-MateoIsabel. 2009. “Cumulative Gender Disadvantage in Contract Employment.” American Journal of Sociology114(4):871–923.
42.
FosterAndrew D.RosenzweigMark R.1993. “Information, Learning, and Wage Rates in Low-Income Rural Areas.” Journal of Human Resources28(4):759–90.
FriedbergRachel M.2000. “You Can’t Take It with You? Immigrant Assimilation and the Portability of Human Capital.” Journal of Labor Economics18(2):221–51.
45.
GilboyJanet A.1991. “Deciding Who Gets In: Decision-Making by Immigration Inspectors.” Law and Society Review25(3):571–99.
46.
GonzalezJosie. 2005. “Demystifying the PERM Audit.” Pp. 13–24 in The David Stanton Manual on Labor Certification, 3rd ed., edited by GonzalezJ.GreenfieldE.Washington, DC: American Immigration Lawyers Association Publications.
47.
HaShang E.2010. “The Consequences of Multiracial Contexts on Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly63(1):29–42.
48.
“Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965.”1965. Public Law 89-236. 79 Stat. 911. 89th Congress.
49.
HirshElizabeth C.2009. “The Strength of Weak Enforcement: The Impact of Discrimination Charges, Legal Environments, and Organizational Conditions on Workplace Segregation.” American Sociological Review74(2):245–71.
50.
HoPensri. 2003. “Performing the ‘Oriental’: Professionals and the Asian Model Minority Myth.” Journal of Asian American Studies6(2):149–75.
51.
HoeferMichaelRytinaNancy F.BakerBryan C.2010. “Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States:January2009.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.
52.
HuntJennifer. 2011. “Which Immigrants Are Most Innovative and Entrepreneurial? Distinctions by Entry Visa.” Journal of Labor Economics29(3):417–57.
53.
“Immigration and National Act of 1952.”1952. Public Law 82-414. 66 Stat. 163. 82nd Congress.
54.
“Immigration Act of 1990.”1990. Public Law 101-649. 104 Stat. 4978. 101st Congress.
55.
JassoGuillermina. 1988. “Whom Shall We Welcome? Elite Judgments of the Criteria for the Selection of Immigrants.” American Sociological Review53(6):919–32.
56.
JassoGuillermina. 2001. “Studying Status: An Integrated Framework.” American Sociological Review66(1):96–124.
57.
JassoGuillerminaRosenzweigMark R.1990. The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
JassoGuillerminaWadhwaVivekGereffiGaryRissingBen A.FreemanRichard B.2010. “How Many Highly Skilled Foreign-Born are Waiting in Line for U.S. Legal Permanent Residence?”International Migration Review44(2):477–98.
59.
KalevAlexandraKellyErin L.DobbinFrank R.2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review71(4):589–617.
60.
KerrWilliam R.LincolnWilliam F.2010. “The Supply Side of Innovation: H-1B Visa Reforms and U.S. Ethnic Invention.” Journal of Labor Economics28(3):473–508.
61.
KingRyan D.MassogliaMichaelUggenChristopher. 2012. “Employment and Exile: U.S. Criminal Deportations, 1908–2005.” American Journal of Sociology117(6):1786–1825.
62.
KitanoHarry H. L.SueStanley. 1973. “The Model Minorities.” Journal of Social Issues29(2):1–9.
63.
LeeTiane L.FiskeSusan T.2006. “Not an Outgroup, Not Yet an Ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations30(6):751–68.
64.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
65.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
66.
LiuJohn M.1992. “The Contours of Asian Professional, Technical and Kindred Work Immigration, 1965–1988.” Sociological Perspectives35(4):673–704.
67.
LoweLisa. 1996. Immigrant Acts: On Asian American Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68.
MaasVictor S.RaquelTorres-González. 2011. “Subjective Performance Evaluation and Gender Discrimination.” Journal of Business Ethics101(4):667–81.
69.
MarcusKenneth L.2010. Jewish Identity and Civil Rights in America, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
MasseyDouglas S.ArangoJoaquinHugoGraemeKouaouciAliPelleginoAdelaTaylorJ. Edward. 1993. “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review19(3):431–66.
71.
MasseyDouglas S.SanchezMagaly R.2012. Brokered Boundaries: Creating Immigrant Identity in Anti-Immigrant Times. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.
72.
MattooAadityaNeaguIleana CristinaÖzdenÇaglar. 2007. “Brain Waste? Educated Immigrants in the US Labor Market.” Journal of Development Economics87(2):255–69.
73.
MenjívarCeciliaAbregoLeisy J.2012. “Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central American Immigrants.” American Journal of Sociology117(5):1380–1421.
74.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–63.
NgaiMae M.2003. “The Strange Career of the Illegal Alien: Immigration Restriction and Deportation Policy in the United States, 1921–1965.” Law and History Review21(1):69–107.
78.
PetersenTrondSaportaIshak. 2004. “The Opportunity Structure for Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology109(4):852–901.
79.
Pew Research Center. 1996. America’s Immigration Quandary: No Consensus on Immigration Problem or Proposed Fixes. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
80.
PfefferJeffrey. 1977. “Toward an Examination of Stratification in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly22(4):553–67.
81.
PhelpsEdmund S.1972. “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” American Economic Review62(4):659–61.
82.
PhillipsDamon J.2005. “Organizational Genealogies and the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Case of Silicon Valley Law Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly50(3):440–72.
83.
PortesAlejandro. 1995. Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
84.
Ramji-NogalesJayaSchoenholtzAndrew I.SchragPhilip G.2007. “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication.” Stanford Law Review60(2):295–411.
85.
ReskinBarbara F.2000. “The Proximate Causes of Employment Discrimination.” Contemporary Sociology29(2):319–28.
86.
ReskinBarbara F.McBrierDebra B.2000. “Why Not Ascription? Organizations’ Employment of Male and Female Managers.” American Sociological Review65(2):210–33.
87.
RidgewayCecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.” American Sociological Review62(2):218–35.
88.
RidgewayCecilia L.CornellShelley J.2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.” Social Forces85(1):431–53.
89.
RissingBen A.2012. “How Government Agents Shape the Employment of Skilled Immigrants.” U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 2012 Occasional Paper Series (ETA-2012).
90.
RissingBen A.2013. “Highly-Skilled Information and Technology Migrant Workers.” Pp. 1646–51 in the Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration, edited by NessI.BellwoodP.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
91.
RubineauBrianKangYoon. 2012. “Bias in White: A Longitudinal Natural Experiment Measuring Changes in Discrimination.” Management Science58(4):660–77.
92.
RyoEmily. 2013. “Deciding to Cross: Norms and Economics of Unauthorized Migration.” American Sociological Review78(4):574–603.
93.
SampsonRobert J.2008. “Rethinking Crime and Immigration.” Contexts7(1):28–33.
94.
SelznickPhilip. 1948. “Foundations of the Theory of Organization.” American Sociological Review13(1):25–35.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldStainbackKevin. 2007. “Discrimination and Desegregation: Equal Opportunity Progress in U.S. Private Sector Workplaces since the Civil Rights Act.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science609(1):49–84.
97.
Tubergenvan FrankMaasInekeFlapHenk. 2004. “The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects.” American Sociological Review69(5):704–727.
U.S. Department of Labor (U.S. DoL). 2010a. “The Foreign Labor Certification Report: 2009 Data, Trends and Highlights across Programs and States.” Office of Foreign Labor Certification Annual Report (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/2009_Annual_Report.pdf).
WatersMary C.EschbachKarl. 1995. “Immigration and Ethnic and Racial Inequality in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology21:419–46.
109.
WilsonJames Q.1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.
110.
ZelditchMorrisJr.1968. “Status, Social.” Pp. 250–57 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 15, edited by SillsD. L.New York: Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
