Research documents a wage penalty for mothers compared to childless women. We demonstrate there is also an occupational status penalty to motherhood. Interrogating supply- and demand-side explanations of the motherhood penalty from the life course perspective, we formulate and test original hypotheses about the short-term and long-run career implications of parity-specific births. We analyze longitudinal data from the European Community and Household Panel for 13 European countries and eight time points between 1994 and 2001. Our fixed-effects models show that status losses for a first birth are not just short-term but accumulate over the career. The timing of a birth in a woman’s life course matters only for older women, who experience a significant penalty to third births. Although the personal strategies that women use to minimize the career costs of motherhood (e.g., having only one child) prove ineffective, our cross-national evidence shows that public policies are linked to the motherhood penalty in occupational status.
AbendrothAnja-KristinVan der LippeTanjaMaasIneke. 2012. “Social Support and the Working Hours of Employed Mothers in Europe.” Social Science Research41(3):581–97.
2.
AisenbreySilkeEvertssonMarieGrunowDaniela. 2009. “Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers’ Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States.” Social Forces88(2):573–605.
3.
AllisonPaul D.2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
4.
AndersonDeborah J.BinderMelissaKrauseKate. 2003. “The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work Schedule Flexibility.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(2):273–94.
5.
BaumCharles L.2002. “The Effect of Work Interruptions on Women’s Wages.” Labourl6(1):l–37.
6.
BeckerGary S.1975. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York and London: Columbia University Press.
7.
BenardStephenCorrellShelley J.2010. “Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty.” Gender & Society24(5):616–46.
8.
BlackwellLouisa. 2001. “Occupational Sex Segregation and Part-Time Work in Modern Britain.” Gender, Work and Organization8(2):146–63.
9.
BlankRebecca. 1990. “Are Part-Time Jobs Bad Jobs?” Pp. 123–55 in A Future of Lousy Jobs? The Changing Structure of U.S. Wages, edited by BurtlessG.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
10.
BruningGwennaelePlantengaJanneke. 1999. “Parental Leave and Equal Opportunities: Experiences in Eight European Countries.” Journal of European Policy9(3):195–209.
11.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review66(2):204–225.
12.
BudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2010. “Differences in Disadvantage: Variations in the Motherhood Penalty across White Women’s Earnings Distribution.” American Sociological Review75(5):705–728.
13.
ByronKristin. 2005. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Work-Family Conflict and its Antecedents.” Journal of Vocational Behavior67(2):169–98.
14.
CastillaEmilio. 2007. Dynamic Analyses in the Social Sciences. London: Academic Press.
15.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–1338.
16.
DanneferDale. 1987. “Aging as Intercohort Differentiation: Accentuation, the Matthew Effect, and the Life Course.” Sociological Forum2(2):211–36.
17.
DesaiSonaldeWaiteLinda J.1991. “Women’s Employment during Pregnancy and after the First Birth: Occupational Characteristics and Work Commitment.” American Sociological Review56(4):551–626.
18.
DexShirleyWardKellyJoshiHeather. 2008. “Changes in Women’s Occupations and Occupational Mobility over 25 Years.” Pp. 54–80 in Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, edited by ScottJ.DexS.JoshiH.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
19.
ElderGlen H.Jr.GieleJanet Z.2009. “Life Course Studies: An Evolving Field.” Pp. 1–24 in The Craft of Life Course Research, edited by ElderG. H.Jr.GieleJ. Z.New York: Guilford.
20.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender and Society24(2):149–66.
21.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
22.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
24.
Eurostat. 1996. European Community and Household Panel (ECHP): Survey Methodology and Implementation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
25.
FilerRandall K.1985. “Occupational Segregation, Compensating Differentials and Comparable Worth.” Pp. 153–76 in Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries, edited by MichaelR. T.HartmannH. I.O’FarrellB.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
GanglMarkusZiefleAndrea. 2009. “Motherhood, Labor Force Behavior, and Women’s Careers: An Empirical Assessment of the Wage Penalty for Motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States.” Demography46(2):341–69.
27.
GanzeboomHarry B. G.De GraafPaul M.TreimanDonald J.1992. “A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research21(1):1–56.
28.
GlassJennifer. 1990. “The Impact of Occupational Segregation on Working Conditions.” Social Forces68(3):779–96.
29.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
GornickJanet C.MeyersMarcia K.2008. “Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform.” Politics & Society36(3):313–49.
31.
GornickJanet C.MeyersMarcia K.RossKatherin E.1998. “Public Policies and the Employment of Mothers: A Cross-National Study.” Social Science Quarterly79(1):36–54.
32.
GrunowDanielaHofmeisterHeatherBuchholzSandra. 2006. “Late 20th-Century Persistence and Decline of the Female Homemaker in Germany and the United States.” International Sociology21(1):101–131.
33.
HeinzJohn P.NelsonRobert L.SandefurRebecca L.LaumannEdward O.2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
HochschildArlie. 1975. “Inside the Clockwork of Male Careers.” Pp. 47–80 in Women and the Power to Change, edited by HoweF.San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
35.
JacobsSheila. 1999. “Trends in Women’s Career Patterns and in Gender Occupational Mobility in Britain.” Gender, Work and Organization6(1):32–46.
36.
KlermanJacob A.LeibowitzArleen. 1994. “The Work-Employment Distinction among New Mothers.” The Journal of Human Resources29(2):277–303.
37.
KorpiWalter. 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics7(2):127–91.
38.
LawrenceBarbara S.1984. Age Grading: The Implicit Organizational Timetable. Cambridge, MA: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management.
39.
MandelHadasSemyonovMoshe. 2006. “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology111(6):1910–49.
40.
MandelHadasShalevMichael. 2009. “How Welfare States Shape the Gender Pay Gap: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces87(4):1873–1912.
41.
MaumeDavid J.1999. “Occupational Segregation and the Career Mobility of White Men and Women.” Social Forces77(4):1433–59.
42.
MayerKarl UlrichSchoepflinUrs. 1989. “The State and the Life Course.” Annual Review of Sociology15:187–209.
43.
MincerJacobPolachekSolomon. 1974. “Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women.” Journal of Political Economy82(2):76–108.
44.
MisraJoyaBudigMichelle J.BoekmannIrene. 2011. “Work-Family Policies and the Effects of Children on Women’s Employment and Wages.” Community, Work & Family14(2):139–57.
45.
MisraJoyaBudigMichelle J.MollerStephanie. 2007. “Reconciliation Policies and the Effects of Motherhood on Employment, Earnings and Poverty.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis9(2):135–55.
OkamotoDinaEnglandPaula. 1999. “Is There a Supply Side to Occupational Sex Segregation?”Sociological Perspectives42(4):557–82.
48.
PetersenTrondPennerAndrew M.HøgnsnesGeir. 2010. “The Within-Job Motherhood Wage Penalty in Norway, 1979–1996.” Journal of Marriage and Family72(5):1274–88.
49.
PetersenTrondPennerAndrew M.HøgnsnesGeir. 2014. “From Motherhood Penalties to Husband Premia: The New Challenge for Gender Equality and Family Policy, Lessons from Norway.” American Journal of Sociology119(5):1434–72.
50.
PettitBeckyHookJennifer L.2005. “The Structure of Women’s Employment in Comparative Perspective.” Social Forces84(2):797–801.
51.
PlantengaJannekeRemeryChantal. 2005. Reconciliation of Work and Private Life: A Comparative Review of Thirty Countries. Synthesis report prepared by the Group of Experts on Gender, Social Inclusion and Employment for the Unit Equality for Women and Men. Directorate-General Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, European Commission.
52.
RidgewayCecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.” American Sociological Review62(2):218–35.
53.
RippeyoungPhyllis L. F.NoonanMary C.2012. “Is Breastfeeding Truly Cost Free?
54.
Income Consequences of Breastfeeding for Women.” American Sociological Review77(2):244–67.
55.
RosenbaumJames E.1979a. “Organizational Career Mobility: Promotion Chances in a Corporation during Periods of Growth and Contraction.” American Journal of Sociology85(1):21–48.
56.
RosenbaumJames E.1979b. “Tournament Mobility: Career Patterns in a Corporation.” Administrative Science Quarterly24(2):220–41.
57.
RosenfeldRachel A.1992. “Job Mobility and Career Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology18(2):39–61.
58.
RosenfeldRachel A.BirkelundGunn E.1995. “Women’s Part-Time Work: A Cross-National Comparison.” European Sociological Review11(2):111–34.
59.
Sigle-RushtonWendyWaldfogelJane. 2007. “Motherhood and Women’s Earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic Countries.” Feminist Economics13(2):55–91.
60.
SmeatonDeborah. 2006. “Work Return Rates after Childbirth in the UK – Trends, Determinants and Implications: A Comparison of Cohorts Born in 1958 and 1970.” Work, Employment and Society20(1):5–25.
61.
StaffJeremyMortimerJeylan T.2012. “Explaining the Motherhood Wage Penalty during the Early Occupational Career.” Demography49(1):1–21.
62.
StierHayaLewin-EpsteinNoahBraunMichael. 2001. “Welfare Regimes, Family Supportive Policies and Women’s Employment along the Life-Course.” American Journal of Sociology106(6):1731–60.
63.
TaniguchiHiromi. 1999. “The Timing of Childbearing and Women’s Wages.” Journal of Marriage and the Family61(4):1008–19.
64.
TreasJudithDrobničSonja. 2010. Dividing the Domestic: Women, Men and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
TreasJudithWidmerEric. 2000. “Married Women’s Employment over the Life Course: Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective.” Social Forces79(4):1409–36.
66.
UunkWilfredKalmijnMatthijsMuffelsRuud. 2005. “The Impact of Young Children on Women’s Labour Supply: A Reassessment of Institutional Effects in Europe.” Acta Sociologica48(1):41–62.
67.
Van der LippeTanja. 2001. “The Effect of Individual and Institutional Constraints on Hours of Paid Work of Women: An International Comparison.” Pp. 221–43 in Women’s Employment in a Comparative Perspective, edited by van der LippeT.Van DijkL.New York: Walter de Gruyter.
68.
VermaVijayClémenceauAnne. 1996. “Methodology of the European Community Household Panel.” Statistics in Transition2(7):1023–62.
69.
WaldfogelJane. 1997. “The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages.” American Sociological Review62(2):209–17.
70.
WaldfogelJaneHiguchiYoshioAbeMasahiro. 1999. “Family Leave Policies and Women’s Retention after Childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan.” Journal of Population Economics12(4):523–45.
71.
WarrPeterPenningtonJanet. 1994. “Occupational Age-Grading: Jobs for Older and Younger Nonmanagerial Employees.” Journal of Vocational Behavior45(3):328–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
