When compared to research on the association between immigration and crime, far less attention has been given to the relationship between immigration, citizenship, and criminal punishment. As such, several fundamental questions about how noncitizens are sanctioned and whether citizenship is a marker of stratification in U.S. courts remain unanswered. Are citizens treated differently than noncitizens—both legal and undocumented—in U.S. federal criminal courts? Is the well-documented Hispanic-white sentencing disparity confounded by citizenship status? Has the association between citizenship and sentencing remained stable over time? And are punishment disparities contingent on the demographic context of the court? Analysis of several years of data from U.S. federal courts indicates that citizenship status is a salient predictor of sentencing outcomes—more powerful than race or ethnicity. Other notable findings include the following: accounting for citizenship substantially attenuates disparities between whites and Hispanics; the citizenship effect on sentencing has grown stronger over time; and the effect is most pronounced in districts with growing noncitizen populations. These findings suggest that as international migration increases, citizenship may be an emerging and powerful axis of sociolegal inequality.
AlbonettiCelesta A.1997. “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992.” Law & Society Review31(4):789–822.
2.
AlbonettiCelesta A.2002. “The Joint Conditioning Effect of Defendant’s Gender and Ethnicity on Length of Imprisonment under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Drug Trafficking/Manufacturing Offenders.” Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice6(1):39–60.
3.
BlackDonald. 1976. The Behavior of Law. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
BlalockHubert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley.
5.
BloemraadIreneKortewegAnnaYurdakulGokce. 2008. “Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State.” Annual Review of Sociology34:153–79.
6.
BlumerHerbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review1(1):3–7.
7.
BushwayShawnPiehlAnne Morrison. 2001. “Judging Judicial Discretion: Legal Factors and Racial Discrimination in Sentencing.” Law & Society Review35(4):733–64.
8.
BushwayShawnJohnsonBrianSlocumLee Ann. 2007. “Is the Magic Still There? The Relevance of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology23(2):151–78.
9.
CitrinJackGreenDonald P.MusteChristopherWongCara. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics59(3):858–81.
10.
ColeDavid. 2003. “Are Foreign Nationals Entitled to the Same Constitutional Rights as Citizens?” Thomas Jefferson Law Review25(2):367–88.
11.
CrawfordCharlesChiricosTedKleckGary. 1998. “Race, Racial Threat, and Sentencing of Habitual Offenders.” Criminology36(3):481–512.
12.
DemuthStephen. 2002. “The Effect of Citizenship Status on Sentencing Outcomes in Drug Cases.” Federal Sentencing Reporter14(5):271–75.
13.
DemuthStephen. 2003. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White Felony Arrestees.” Criminology41(3):873–907.
14.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
15.
DoernerJill K.DemuthStephen. 2010. “The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts.” Justice Quarterly27(1):1–27.
16.
DrebyJoanna. 2010. Divided by Borders: Mexican Migrants and Their Children. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
EllermannAntje. 2009. States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EngenRodneyGaineyRandy R.2000. “Modeling the Effects of Legally Relevant and Extralegal Factors under Sentencing Guidelines: The Rules Have Changed.” Criminology38(4):1207–30.
19.
EverettRonald S.WojtkiewiczRoger A.2002. “Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(2):189–211.
20.
FeldmeyerBenUlmerJeffery T.2011. “Racial/Ethnic Threat and Federal Sentencing.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(2):238–70.
21.
GilesMichael W.BucknerMelanie A.1993. “David Duke and Black Threat: An Old Hypothesis Revisited.” Journal of Politics55(3):702–13.
22.
GuerinoPaulHarrisonPaige M.SabolWilliam J.2011. Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
HartleyRichard D.ArmendarizLuisa F.2011. “Border Justice? Sentencing Federal Narcotics Offenders in Southwest Border Districts: A Focus on Citizenship Status.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice27(1):43–62.
24.
HoferPaul J.BlackwellKevin. 2001. “What Are We Learning from Multiple Regression Studies of Federal Sentencing Decisions?” Presented at the American Society of Criminology meeting, San Diego, CA, November.
25.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104(1):40–60.
26.
HuberGregory A.GordonSanford C.2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science48(2):247–63.
27.
HuntingtonSamuel P.2004. “The Hispanic Challenge.” Foreign Policy141:30–45.
JacobsDavidCarmichaelJason T.KentStephanie L.2005. “Vigilantism, Current Racial Threat, and Death Sentences.” American Sociological Review70(4):656–77.
30.
JacobsDavidHelmsRonald. 1996. “Towards a Political Model of Incarceration: A Time-Series Examination of Multiple Explanations for Prison Admission Rates.” American Journal of Sociology102(2):323–57.
31.
JacobsonDavid. 1996. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
32.
JohnsonBrian D.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sentencing Departures across Modes of Conviction.” Criminology41(2):449–90.
33.
JohnsonBrian D.BetsingerSara. 2009. “Punishing the ‘Model Minority’: Asian-American Criminal Sentencing Outcomes in Federal District Courts.” Criminology47(4):1045–90.
34.
JohnsonBrianUlmerJefferyKramerJohn. 2008. “The Social Context of Guideline Circumvention: The Case of Federal District Courts.” Criminology46(3):711–83.
35.
KandelWilliam A.2011. “The U.S. Foreign-Born Population: Trends and Selected Characteristics.”Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.
36.
KanstroomDaniel. 2007. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
KauttPaula M.DeLoneMiriam A.2006. “Sentencing Outcomes under Competing but Coexisting Sentencing Interventions: Untying the Gordian Knot.” Criminal Justice Review31(2):105–31.
38.
KauttPaula M.SpohnCassia. 2002. “Crack-ing Down on Black Drug Offenders? Testing for Interactions among Offenders’ Race, Drug Type, and Sentencing Strategy in Federal Drug Sentences.” Justice Quarterly19(1):1–35.
39.
KingRyan D.MassogliaMichaelUggenChristopher. 2012. “Employment and Exile: U.S. Criminal Deportations, 1908–2005.” American Journal of Sociology117(6):1786–1825.
40.
KramerJohnSteffensmeierDarrell. 1993. “Race and Imprisonment Decisions.” Sociological Quarterly34(2):357–76.
41.
ManzaJeffUggenChristopher. 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
MasseyDouglas S.2007. Categorically Unequal: The American Stratification System. New York: Russell Sage.
43.
McLarenLauren M.2003. “Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants.” Social Forces81(3):909–36.
44.
MenjivarCecilia. 2006. “Liminal Legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan Immigrants’ Lives in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology111(4):999–1037.
45.
MillerTeresa. 2002. “The Impact of Mass Incarceration on Immigration Policy.” Pp. 214–38 in Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, edited by MauerM.Chesney-LindM.New York: New Press.
46.
MishlerWilliamSheehanReginald S.1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review87(1):87–101.
47.
MitchellOjmarrhMacKenzieDoris L.2004. The Relationship between Race, Ethnicity, and Sentencing Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Sentencing Research: Final Report, submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
MustardDavid. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics44(1):285–314.
PasselJeffrey S.CohnD’Vera. 2011. “Unauthorized Immigrant Population: National and State Trends, 2010.” Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
53.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530:74–96.
54.
QuillianLincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review60(4):586–611.
55.
Rubio-MarinRuth. 2000. Immigration as a Democratic Challenge: Citizenship and Inclusion in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
ScaliaJohn. 1996. “Noncitizens in the Federal Criminal Justice System, 1984–94: Federal Justice Statistics Program.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Washington, DC.
57.
SchanzenbachMax. 2005. “Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics.” Journal of Legal Studies34(1):57–92.
58.
SmithRogers M.1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online. 2010. “Table 2.0030.2010: Attitudes toward Perceived Threats to the United States.” Retrieved October 4, 2013 (http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t200302010.pdf).
60.
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online. 2011a. “Table 4.0004.2011: Criminal Aliens Removed from the United States.” Retrieved February 3, 2013 (http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t400042011.pdf).
61.
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online.2011b. “Table 6.42.2011: Non-U.S. Citizens Held in State and Federal Prisons.” Retrieved October 3, 2013 (http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t6422011.pdf).
62.
SoysalYasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
SpohnCassiaGruhlJohnWelchSusan. 1981–1982. “The Effect of Race on Sentencing: A Re-examination of an Unsettled Question.” Law & Society Review16(1):71–88.
64.
SpohnCassiaHolleranDavid. 2000. “The Imprisonment Penalty Paid by Young, Unemployed Black and Hispanic Male Offenders.” Criminology38(1):281–306.
65.
SteffensmeierDarrellDemuthStephen. 2000. “Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who Is Punished More Harshly?” American Sociological Review65(5):705–29.
66.
SteffensmeierDarrellDemuthStephen. 2001. “Ethnicity and Judges’ Sentencing Decisions: Hispanic-Black-White Comparisons.” Criminology39(1):145–78.
67.
SteffensmeierDarrellUlmerJefferyKramerJohn. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male.” Criminology36(4):763–98.
68.
StumpfJuliet P.2006. “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power.” American University Law Review56(2):367–420.
69.
UlmerJeffery T.2005. “The Localized Uses of Federal Sentencing Guidelines in Four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of Processual Order.” Symbolic Interaction28(2):255–79.
70.
UlmerJeffery T.JohnsonBrian D.2004. “Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis.” Criminology42(1):132–72.
71.
UlmerJeffery T.LightMichael T.KramerJohn. 2011. “Racial Disparity in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision: An Alternative Analysis to the USSC’s 2010 Report.” Criminology & Public Policy10(4):1077–1118.
72.
United States v. Booker. 2005. 543 U.S. 220.
73.
United States v. State of Arizona. 2011. 10-16645.
74.
U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC). 2004. Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing: An Assessment of How Well the Federal Criminal Justice System Is Achieving the Goals of Sentencing Reform. Washington, DC: USSC.
75.
U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC). 2010. 2010 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. Washington, DC: USSC.
76.
van KalmthoutA. M.Hofstee-van der MeulenF.B.A.M.DünkelF., eds. 2007. Foreigners in European Prisons. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
77.
WangXia. 2012. “Undocumented Immigrants as Perceived Criminal Threat: A Test of the Minority Threat Perspective.” Criminology50(3):743–76.
78.
WatersMary C.JiménezTomas R.2005. “Assessing Immigrant Assimilation: New Empirical and Theoretical Challenges.” Annual Review of Sociology31:105–25.
79.
WolfeScott E.PyroozDavid C.SpohnCassia C.2011. “Unraveling the Effect of Offender Citizenship Status on Federal Sentencing Outcomes.” Social Science Research40(1):349–62.
80.
WuJawjeongDeLoneMiriam A.2012. “Revisiting the Normal Crime and Liberation Hypotheses: Citizenship Status and Unwarranted Disparity.” Criminal Justice Review37(2):214–38.
81.
WuJawjeongSpohnCassia. 2010. “Inter-District Disparity in Sentencing in Three U.S. District Courts.” Crime & Delinquency56(2):290–322.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
