Competing visions of who is deserving of rewards and privileges, and different understandings of the fairness of reward allocation processes, are at the heart of political conflict. Indeed, social movement scholars generally agree that a key component of most, if not all, social movements is a shared belief that existing conditions are unfair and subject to change (Gamson 1992; McAdam 1982; Snow et al. 1986; Turner and Killian 1987). In this article we consider the role that residential segregation by education level plays in shaping perceptions of distributive justice and, in turn, providing a context conducive to conservative political mobilization. We apply these ideas in an analysis of Tea Party activism and show that educational segregation is a strong predictor of the number of Tea Party organizations in U.S. counties. In a complementary analysis, we find that individuals with a bachelor’s degree are more likely than people who do not have any college education to support the Tea Party; this relationship is strongest in counties with higher levels of educational segregation.
AlmeidaPaul D.2003. “Opportunity Organizations and Threat Induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings.” American Journal of Sociology109(2):345–400.
4.
BaldassariDeliaBearmanPeter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review72(5):784–811.
5.
BartelsLarry M.2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BeiselNicola. 1997. Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BelsleyDavid A.KuhEdwinWelschRoy E.1980. Regression Diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
8.
BergerJosephZelditchMorrisAndersonBoCohenBernard. 1972. “Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status Value Formulation.” Pp. 119–46 in Sociological Theories of Progress, Vol. 2, edited by BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
BinderAmy J.WoodKate. 2013. Becoming Right: How Campuses Shape Young Conservatives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BlalockHubert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: John Wiley.
11.
BlauPeter M.1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
12.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley.
13.
BoboLawrenceKluegelJames. 1993. “Opposition to Race-Targeting: Self-Interest, Stratification Ideology, or Racial Attitudes?”American Sociological Review58(4):443–64.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardoEmbrickDavid G.2007. “‘Every Place Has a Ghetto…’: The Significance of Whites’ Social Segregation.” Symbolic Interaction30(3):323–45.
15.
BourdieuPierre. 1974. “Schooling as a Conservative Force.” Pp. 32–46 in Research in the Sociology of Education, edited by EgglestonJ.London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
16.
BoykoffJulesLascheverEulalie. 2011. “The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the U.S. Media.” Social Movement Studies10(4):341–66.
17.
BraunsteinRuth. 2014. “Who Are ‘We the People’?: Negotiating Multidimensional Identity in the Tea Party.” Pp. 149–74 in Understanding the Tea Party, edited by Van DykeN.MeyerD. S.Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
18.
BrezinaTimothyWinderKenisha. 2003. “Economic Disadvantage, Status Generalization, and Negative Racial Stereotyping by White Americans.” Social Psychology Quarterly66(4):402–418.
19.
ButtonJames W.RienzoBarbara A.WaldKenneth D.1997. Private Lives, Public Conflicts: Battles over Gay Rights in American Communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
20.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
CookKaren S.1975. “Expectations, Evaluations, and Equity.” American Sociological Review40:372–88.
23.
DiMaggioAnthony. 2011. The Rise of the Tea Party: Political Discontent and Corporate Media in the Age of Obama. New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
DischLisa. 2012. “The Tea Party: A ‘White Citizenship’ Movement.” Pp. 133–51 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by RosenthalL.TrostC.Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
EnglandPaulaThompsonJenniferAmanCarolyn. 2001. “The Sex Gap in Pay and Comparable Worth: An Update.” Pp. 551–65 in Sourcebook of Labor Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes, edited by BergI.KallebergA. L.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
26.
FetnerTinaKingBrayden G.2011. “Where Did the Tea Party Come From?” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, NV.
27.
GamsonWilliam A.1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GaventaJohn. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
GoldstoneJack A.TillyCharles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” Pp. 179–94 in Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by AminzadeR. R.GoldstoneJ. A.McAdamD.PerryE.SewellW. H.Jr.TarrowS.TillyC.New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GreenDonaldPalmquistBradleySchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
GrossNeilMedvetzThomasRussellRupert. 2011. “The Contemporary American Conservative Movement.” Annual Review of Sociology37(1):325–54.
32.
GusfieldJoseph. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
33.
HofstadterRichard J.1964, November. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” Harpers Magazine, pp. 77–86.
34.
HomansGeorge. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt.
35.
HuntMatthew O.1996. “The Individual, Society, or Both? A Comparison of Black, Latino, and White Beliefs about the Causes of Poverty.” Social Forces75(1):293–322.
JackmanMary. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
JacobsJerry A.2001. “Evolving Patterns of Sex Segregation.” Pp. 535–50 in Sourcebook of Labor Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes, edited by BergI.KallebergA. L.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
39.
JassoGuillermina. 1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review45(1):3–32.
40.
JonesDale E.DotySherriGrammichCliffordHorschJames E.HousealRichardLynnMacMarcumJohn P.SanchagrinKenneth M.TaylorRichard H.2002. Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000: An Enumeration by Region, State and County Based on Data Reported by 149 Religious Bodies. Nashville, TN: Glenmary Research Center.
41.
KelleyJonathanEvansM. D. R.1993. “The Legitimation of Inequality: Attitudes towards Inequality in Nine Nations.” American Journal of Sociology99(1):719–37.
42.
KingGary. 1989. “Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications.” International Studies Quarterly33(2):123–98.
43.
KluegelJames R.SmithEliot R.1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
44.
LasswellHarold Dwight. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
45.
MartinIsaac William. 2008. The Permanent Tax Revolt: How the Property Tax Transformed American Politics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
MarwellGeraldOliverPamela. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
MarwellGeraldOliverPamela E.PrahlRalph. 1988. “Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III.” American Journal of Sociology94(3):502–534.
48.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27(1):415–44.
51.
McVeighRory. 2009. The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-Wing Movements and National Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
MillerWalter B.1958. “Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency.” Journal of Social Issues14(3):5–19.
53.
MillerWilliam J.WallingJeremy D., eds. 2012. Tea Party Effects on 2010 U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
54.
MontgomeryPeter. 2012. “The Tea Party and the Religious Right Movements: Frenemies with Benefits.” Pp. 242–74 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by RosenthalL.TrostC.Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS). 2008. “National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities-Core Codes-Definitions-Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy.” Washington, DC: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute (http://nccs.urban.org/).
56.
NieNorman H.JunnJaneStehlik-BarryKenneth. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
OberschallAnthony. 1993. Social Movements: Ideologies, Interests, and Identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.
58.
OliverPamela E.MarwellGerald. 1988. “The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II.” American Sociological Review53(1):1–8.
59.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
OlzakSusan. 1992. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
ParkerChristopher S.BarretoMatt A.2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
PerrinAndrew J.TepperSteven J.CarenNealMorrisSally. 2011. “Cultures of the Tea Party.” Contexts10(2):74–75.
64.
PetersenTrondMorganLaurie. 1995. “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology101(2):329–65.
65.
PostelCharles. 2012. “The Tea Party in Historical Perspective: A Conservative Response to a Crisis of Political Economy.” Pp. 25–46 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by RosenthalL.TrostC.Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
QuillianLincoln. 2012. “Segregation and Poverty Concentration: The Role of Three Segregations.” American Sociological Review77(3):354–79.
67.
RafailPatrickWalkerEdward T.McCarthyJohn D.GromisAshley. 2011. “Explaining the Spatial Distribution of the 2009 Tax Day Tea Party Protests.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, NV.
68.
RidgewayCecilia. 1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.” American Sociological Review62(2):218–35.
69.
RoystonPatrick. 2004. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values.” Stata Journal4(3):227–41.
70.
RoystonPatrick. 2005. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values: Update.” Stata Journal5(2):1–14.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
ScottoThomasClarkeHaroldKornbergAllan. 2010. “The Dynamic Political Economy of Support for Barack Obama during the 2008 Presidential Election Campaign.” Electoral Studies29(4):545–56.
74.
ShepelakNormaAlwinDuane. 1986. “Beliefs about Inequality and Perceptions of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review51(1):30–46.
75.
SkocpolThedaWilliamsonVanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
SkrentnyJohn D.2006. “Policy-Elite Perceptions and Social Movement Success: Understanding Variations in Group Inclusion in Affirmative Action.” American Journal of Sociology111(6):1762–1815.
77.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenStevenBenfordRobert. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51(4):454–81.
78.
TepperSteven J.2011. Not Here, Not Now, Not That! Protest over Art and Culture in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
TillyCharles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. American Community Survey Five-Year Estimates. Data retrieved (http://factfinder2.census.gov).
82.
Van DykeNellaSouleSarah A.2002. “Structural Social Change and the Mobilizing Effect of Threat: Explaining Levels of Patriot and Militia Mobilizing in the United States.” Social Problems49(4):497–520.
83.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
WilliamsonVanessaSkocpolThedaCogginJohn. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics9(1):25–43.
85.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
ZernikeKate. 2010. Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America. New York: Times Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
