Americans are convinced that employment stability has declined in recent decades, but previous research on this question has led to mixed conclusions. A key challenge is that trends for men and women are in opposite directions and appear to cancel each other out. We clarify this situation by examining trends in employer tenure by sex, marital status, and parental status. We find that married mothers are behind the increase in women’s job tenure, but men and never-married women have seen declines in tenure. Furthermore, we show that the timing of tenure trends for women parallels periods of increased labor force attachment. Finally, we find that shifts in industry and occupation composition can account for the decline in tenure among men and never-married women before 1996 but not afterward. We situate these diverging trends in two broad shifts in expectations, norms, and behaviors in the labor market: the end-of-work discourse and the revolution in women’s identification with paid work. Our findings support the view that job tenure is declining for all groups, but women’s greater labor force attachment, especially their more continuous employment around childbirth, countered and masked this trend.
ArthurMichael B.RousseauDenise M.1996. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BakerMichaelMilliganKevin. 2008. “How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers’ Employment?” Journal of Labor Economics26:655–91.
3.
BaumCharles L.2003a. “The Effect of State Maternity Leave Legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on Employment and Wages.” Labour Economics10:573–96.
4.
BaumCharles L.2003b. “The Effects of Maternity Leave Legislation on Mothers’ Labor Supply after Childbirth.” Southern Economic Journal69:772–99.
5.
BaumCharles L.2006. “The Effects of Government-Mandated Family Leave on Employer Family Leave Policies.” Contemporary Economic Policy24:432–45.
6.
BaumanZygmunt. 2005. Work, Consumerism and the New Poor, 2nd ed.New York: Open University Press.
7.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2007. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
BidwellMatthew. 2013. “What Happened to Long Term Employment? The Role of Worker Power and Environmental Turbulence in Explaining Declines in Worker Tenure.” Organization Science24:1061–82.
9.
BielbyDenise Del VentoBielbyWilliam T.1984. “Work Commitment, Sex-Role Attitudes, and Women’s Employment.” American Sociological Review49:234–47.
10.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology91:759–99.
11.
BlankRebecca M.2000. “Fighting Poverty: Lessons from Recent U.S. History.” Journal of Economic Perspectives14:3–19.
12.
CappelliPeter. 1999. The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
CasperLynne M.BianchiSuzanne M.2002. Continuity & Change in the American Family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
CohanySharon R.SokEmy. 2007. “Trends in Labor-Force Participation of Married Mothers of Infants.” Monthly Labor Review130:9–16.
15.
CohenPhilip N.HuffmanMatt L.KnauerStefanie. 2009. “Stalled Progress? Gender Segregation and Wage Inequality among Managers, 1980–2000.” Work and Occupations36:318–42.
16.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.OvadiaSethVannemanReeve. 2001. “The Glass Ceiling Effect.” Social Forces80:655–81.
17.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2004. Gender Inequality at Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2011. “The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes from 1977 to 2008.” American Journal of Sociology117:259–89.
19.
EnglandPaula. 1981. “Assessing Trends in Occupational Sex Segregation, 1900–1976.” Pp. 273–95 in Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets, edited by BergI.New York: Academic Press.
20.
EnglandPaula. 2006. “Desegregation Stalled: The Changing Gender Composition of College Majors, 1971–2002.” Gender & Society20:657–77.
21.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society24:149–66.
22.
FarberHenry S.1995. “Are Lifetime Jobs Disappearing? Job Duration in the United States: 1973–1993.” Working Paper No. 5014, National Bureau of Eeconomic Research, Cambridge, MA.
23.
FarberHenry S.2009. “Job Loss and the Decline in Job Security in the United States.” Working Paper No. 520, Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
24.
GlassJennifer L.RileyLisa. 1998. “Family Responsive Policies and Employee Retention Following Childbirth.” Social Forces76:1401–1435.
25.
GoldenLonnie. 2002. “Flexible Work Schedule: Which Workers Get Them?” American Behavioral Scientist44:1157–78.
26.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review96:1–21.
27.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.2002. “The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy110:730–70.
28.
HallDouglas T.2002. Careers In and Out of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
HanWen-JuiWaldfogelJane. 2003. “Parental Leave: The Impact of Recent Legislation on Parents’ Leave Taking.” Demography40:191–200.
30.
HandyCharles. 1989. Age of Unreason. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
HofferthSandra L.CurtinSally C.2006. “Parental Leave Statutes and Maternal Return to Work after Childbirth in the United States.” Work and Occupations33:73–105.
32.
HollisterMatissa N.2011a. “Employer and Occupational Instability in Two Cohorts of the National Longitudinal Surveys.” Sociological Quarterly53:238–63.
33.
HollisterMatissa N.2011b. “Employment Stability in the U.S. Labor Market: Rhetoric versus Reality.” Annual Review of Sociology37:305–324.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women’s Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
KallebergArne L.2009. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Review74:1–22.
37.
KlermanJacob AlexLeibowitzArleen. 1997. “Labor Supply Effects of State Maternity Leave Legislation.” Pp. 65–85 in Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace, edited by BlauF. D.EhrenbergR. G.New York: Russell Sage.
38.
KlermanJacob AlexLeibowitzArleen. 1999. “Job Continuity among New Mothers.” Demography36:145–55.
39.
LaughlinLynda. 2011. “Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns of First-Time Mothers: 1961–2008.” Current Population Report No. P70-128, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
40.
LevyFrank. 1998. The New Dollars and Dreams: American Incomes and Economic Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
MarcotteDave E.1995. “Declining Job Stability: What We Know and What It Means.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management14:590–98.
42.
MattinglyMarybeth J.SmithKristin E.2010. “Changes in Wives Employment When Husbands Stop Working: A Recession-Prosperity Comparison.” Family Relations59:343–57.
43.
McKinleyWilliamMoneMark A.BarkerVincent L.III.1998. “Some Ideological Foundations of Organizational Downsizing.” Journal of Management Inquiry7:198–212.
44.
MunasingheLalithReifTaniaHenriquesAlice. 2008. “Gender Gap in Wage Returns to Job Tenure and Experience.” Labour Economics15:1296–1316.
NeumarkDavid. 2000. On the Job: Is Long-Term Employment a Thing of the Past?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
O’NeillJunePolachekSolomon. 1993. “Why the Gender Gap in Wages Narrowed in the 1980s.” Journal of Labor Economics11:205–228.
48.
OstermanPaul. 1999. Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
PercheskiChristine. 2008. “Opting Out? Cohort Differences in Professional Women’s Employment Rates from 1960 to 2005.” American Sociological Review73:497–517.
50.
RexroatCynthia. 1992. “Changes in the Employment Continuity of Succeeding Cohorts of Young Women.” Work and Occupations19:18–34.
51.
RoseStephen. 1995. “The Decline of Employment Stability in the 1980s.” Research Report No. 95-04, National Commission on Employment Policy, Washington, DC.
52.
RosenfeldRachel A.1996. “Women’s Work Histories.” Population and Development Review22:199–222.
53.
SaxenianAnnaLee. 1996. “Beyond Boundaries: Open Labor Markets and Learning in Silicon Valley.” Pp. 23–39 in The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, edited by ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M.New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
SayerLiana C.CohenPhilip N.CasperLynne M.2004. Women, Men, and Work: The American People Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55.
SennettRichard. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, 1st ed. New York: Norton.
56.
SennettRichard. 2006. The Culture of the New Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
SennettRichard. 2008. The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
SheltonBeth AnneJohnDaphne. 1996. “The Division of Household Labor.” Annual Review of Sociology22:299–322.
59.
SmithKristin. 2008. “Working Hard for the Money: Trends in Women’s Employment, 1970–2007.” Report on Rural America No. 5, Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
60.
SmithKristin E.2012. “Recessions Accelerate Trend of Wives as Breadwinners.” Issue Brief No. 56, Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
61.
SmithKristinDownsBarbaraO’ConnellMartin. 2001. “Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 1961–1995.” Current Population Report No. P70-79, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
62.
SmithKristin E.TickamyerAnn R.2011. Economic Restructuring and Family Well-Being in Rural America. University Park: Penn State University Press.
63.
SorensenAnnemette. 1983. “Women’s Employment Patterns after Marriage.” Jounal of Marriage and Family45:311–21.
64.
StewartJay. 2000. “Did Job Security Decline in the 1990s?” Pp. 257–99 in On the Job: Is Long-Term Employment a Thing of the Past?, edited by NeumarkD.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
65.
StoneKatherine Van Wezel. 2004. From Widgets to Digits: Employment Regulation for the Changing Workplace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66.
StranglemanTim. 2007. “The Nostalgia for Permanence at Work? The End of Work and Its Commentators.” Sociological Review55:81–103.
67.
SwinnertonKenneth A.WialHoward. 1995. “Is Job Stability Declining in the U.S. Economy?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review48:293–304.
68.
TolbertCharles M.HoranPatrick M.BeckE. M.1980. “The Structure of Economic Segmentation: A Dual Economy Approach.” American Journal of Sociology85:1095–1116.
69.
TolbertPamela S.ZuckerLynne G.1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly28:22–39.
70.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldStainbackKevinTaylorTiffanyZimmerCatherineRobinsonCorreMcTagueTricia. 2006. “Documenting Desegregation: Segregation in American Workplaces by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex, 1966–2003.” American Sociological Review71:565–88.
71.
UchitelleLouis. 2006. The Disposable American: Layoffs and Their Consequences, 1st ed. New York: Knopf.
72.
Unicon Research Corporation. 2013. “Current Population Survey on Web, Workplace Topics January/February 1971–2012.” Retrieved February 21, 2013 (www.unicon.com).
73.
WaldfogelJane. 1999. “The Impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management18:281–302.
74.
WallaceMichaelKallebergArne L.1981. “Economic Organization of Firms and Labor Market Consequences: Toward a Specification of Dual Economy Theory.” Pp. 77–113 in Sociological Perspsectives on Labor Markets, edited by BergI.New York: Academic Press.
75.
WilliamsJoan C.CooperHolly Cohen. 2004. “The Public Policy of Motherhood.” Journal of Social Issues60:849–65.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
