Although risk assessments are critical inputs to economic and organizational decision-making, we lack a good understanding of the social and political causes of shifts in risk perceptions and the consequences of those changes. This article uses social movement theory to explain the effect of environmental activism on corporations’ perceived environmental risk and actual financial performance. We define environmental risk as audiences’ perceptions that a firm’s practices or policies will lead to greater potential for an environmental failure or crisis that would expose it to financial decline. Using data on environmental activism targeting U.S. firms between 2004 and 2008, we examine variation in the effectiveness of secondary and primary stakeholder activism in shaping perceptions about environmental risk. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that primary stakeholder activism against a firm affects its perceived environmental risk, which subsequently has a negative effect on the firm’s financial performance.
AdamBarbaravan LoonJoost. 2000. “Introduction: Repositioning Risk: The Challenge for Social Theory.” Pp. 1–33 in The Risk Society and Beyond, edited by AdamB.BeckU.van LoonJ.London: Sage Publications.
2.
AgnoneJon. 2007. “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement.” Social Forces85:1593–1620.
3.
AmentaEdwinCarenNealChiarelloElizabethSuYang. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology36:287–307.
4.
AnandJaideepSinghHarbir. 1997. “Asset Redeployment, Acquisitions, and Corporate Strategy in Declining Industries.” Strategic Management Journal18:99–118.
5.
AnderssonLynneBatemanThomas. 2000. “Individual Environmental Initiatives: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal43:548–70.
6.
AndrewsKenneth T.2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the War on Poverty, 1965 to 1971.” American Sociological Review66:71–95.
7.
ArmstrongElizabethBernsteinMary. 2007. “Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory26:74–99.
8.
Associated Press. 2004. “Environmentalists Protesting Energy Company’s Stance on Global Warming.” Associated Press State & Local Wire, May25.
9.
BansalPratimaClellandIain. 2004. “Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment.” Academy of Management Journal47:93–103.
10.
BansalPratimaRothKendall. 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” Academy of Management Journal43:717–36.
11.
BaronDavid. 2005. “Competing for the Public through the News Media.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy14:339–76.
12.
BeckUlrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi, India: Sage.
13.
BossoChristopher. 2005. Environment, Inc.: From Grassroots to Beltway. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
14.
BursteinPaul. 1999. “Social Movements and Public Policy.” Pp. 3–21 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
BursteinPaulLintonApril. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns.” Social Forces81:380–408.
16.
Business Wire. 2000. “STMicroelectronics Ranked by Innovest Strategic Value Advisors as World’s Only ‘AAA.’”October31.
17.
CressDanielSnowDavid. 2000. “The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation and Framing.” American Journal of Sociology105:1063–1104.
18.
DavisGeraldThompsonTracy. 1994. “A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly39:141–73.
19.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48:147–60.
20.
DohJonathanGuayTerence. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies43:47–73.
21.
DunlapRileyMertigAngela. 1992. American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
ElliotNils Lindahl. 2006. Mediating Nature: Environmentalism and Modern Culture. London: Routledge.
24.
EtzionDror. 2007. “Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992–Present: A Review.” Journal of Management33:637–64.
25.
FloridaRichard. 1996. “Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing.” California Management Review39:80–105.
26.
ForbesLindaJermierJohn. 2002. “The Institutionalization of Voluntary Organizational Greening and the Ideals of Environmentalism: Lessons about Official Culture from Symbolic Organizational Theory.” Pp. 194–213 in Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, edited by HoffmanA.VentrescaM.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
FreemanEdward. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GamsonWilliam. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.
GanglMarkus. 2010. “Causal Inference in Sociological Research.” Annual Review of Sociology36:21–47.
30.
GiddensAnthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
31.
GiugniMarco. 1998. “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology24:371–93.
32.
GompersPaulIshiiJoyMetrickAndrew. 2003. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics118:107–155.
33.
HansonRobertSongMoon. 2003. “Long-Term Performance of Divesting Firms and the Effect of Managerial Ownership.” Journal of Economics & Finance27:321–36.
34.
HendryJamie. 2006. “Taking Aim at Business: What Factors Lead Environmental Non-governmental Organizations to Target Particular Firms?”Business and Society45:47–86.
35.
HoffmanAndrew. 1997. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.
36.
HoffmanAndrewVentrescaMarc. 2002. Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
IngramPaulYueLoriRaoHayagreeva. 2010. “Trouble in Store: Probes, Protests, and Store Openings by Wal-Mart, 1998–2007.” American Journal of Sociology116:53–92.
38.
JonssonStefanGreveHenrichFujiwara-GreveTakako. 2009. “Undeserved Loss: The Spread of Legitimacy Loss to Innocent Organizations in Response to Reported Corporate Deviance.” Administrative Science Quarterly54:195–228.
39.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica47:263–91.
40.
KingBrayden. 2008a. “A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly53:395–421.
41.
KingBrayden. 2008b. “A Social Movement Perspective of the Stakeholder Collective Action and Influence.” Business and Society47:21–49.
42.
KingBraydenPearceNicholas. 2010. “The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements and Institutional Change in Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology36:249–67.
43.
KingBraydenSouleSarah. 2007. “Social Movements as Extra-Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effect of Protests on Stock Price Returns.” Administrative Science Quarterly52:413–42.
44.
KLD Research and Analytics. 2006. “Getting Started with KLD Stats and KLD’s Ratings Definitions.” KLD Research and Analytics Inc. Document accessed through Wharton Research Data Services.
45.
KonarShameekCohenMarc. 1997. “Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management32:109–124.
46.
KurtzLloyd. 2008. “Socially Responsible Investment and Shareholder Activism.” Pp. 249–80 in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
LangLarryStulzRene. 1994. “Tobin’s q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Political Economy102:1248–80.
48.
LenoxMichaelEesleyCharles. 2009. “Private Environmental Activism and the Selection and Response of Firm Targets.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy18:45–73.
49.
LettoJay. 1995. “TV Lets Corporations Pull Green Wool Over Viewers’ Eyes.” FAIR, July/August. Retrieved July 2010 (http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1309).
50.
LipskyMichael. 1968. “Protest as a Political Resource.” American Political Science Review62:1144–58.
51.
LounsburyMichael. 2001. “Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources.” Strategic Management Journal22:545–64.
52.
LudersJoseph. 2006. “The Economics of Movement Success: Business Responses to Civil Rights Mobilization.” American Journal of Sociology111:963–98.
53.
MaguireStevePhillipsNelson2009. “Theorising Risk and Organization.” Presented at the European Group for Organization Studies Annual Colloquium, Barcelona, Spain.
54.
McAdamDougSuYang. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review67:696–721.
55.
McCammonHollyCampbellKarenGranbergEllenMoweryChristine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866–1919.” American Sociological Review66:49–70.
56.
McDonnellMary HunterKingBrayden G.2010. “Keeping up Appearances: The Use of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives to Palliate an Image Threat.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.
57.
McWilliamsAbagailSiegelDonald. 2000. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification.” Strategic Management Journal21:603–609.
58.
McWilliamsAbagailSiegelDonald. 2001. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective.” Academy of Management Review26:117–27.
59.
MilsteinMarkHartStuartYorkAnne. 2002. “Coercion Breeds Variation: The Differential Impact of Isomorphic Pressures on Environmental Strategies.” Pp. 151–72 in Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, edited by HoffmanA.VentrescaM.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
60.
MinkoffDebra. 1999. “Bending with the Wind: Strategic Change and Adaptation by Women’s and Racial Minority Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology104:1666–1703.
PerrowCharles. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
PivenFrancesClowardRichard. 1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why they Succeed, How they Fail. New York: Pantheon.
64.
PotoskiMatthewPrakashAseem. 2005. “Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms’ Regulatory Compliance.” American Journal of Political Science49:235–48.
65.
PoznerJo-Ellen. 2008. “Stigma and Settling Up: An Integrated Approach to the Consequences of Organizational Misconduct for Organizational Elites.” Journal of Business Ethics80:141–50.
66.
ProffittTrexlerSpicerAndrew. 2006. “Shaping the Shareholder Activism Agenda: Institutional Investors and Global Social Issues.” Strategic Organization4:165–90.
67.
RaeburnNicole. 2004. Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
68.
RaoHayagreeva. 2009. Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
ReidErinToffelMichael. 2009. “Responding to Public and Private Politics: Corporate Disclosure of Climate Change Strategies.” Strategic Management Journal30:1157–78.
70.
RennOrtwin. 2007. “The Risk Handling Chain.” Pp. 21–75 in The Tolerability of Risk: A New Framework for Risk Management, edited by BouderF.SlavinD.LöfstedtR.Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
SantoroWayne A.McGuireGail M.1997. “Social Movement Insiders: The Impact of Institutional Activists on Affirmative Action and Comparable Worth Policies.” Social Problems44:503–519.
73.
ScheyttTobiasSoinKimSahlin-AnderssonKerstinPowerMichael. 2006. “Special Research Symposium: Organizations and the Management of Risk – Introduction: Organizations, Risk and Regulation.” Journal of Management Studies43:1331–37.
74.
SchneiderGreg. 2005. “GE Determined to Show More ‘Ecomagination.’”Washington Post, Tuesday, May10, p. E02.
75.
SchurmanRachelMunroWilliam. 2009. “Targeting Capital: A Cultural Economy Approach to Understanding the Efficacy of Two Anti-Genetic Engineering Movements.” American Journal of Sociology115:155–202.
76.
ServaesHenri. 1991. “Tobin’s Q and the Gains from Takeovers.” Journal of Finance46:409–419.
77.
ShortJames. 1984. “The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis.” American Sociological Review49:711–25.
78.
SineWesleyLeeBrandon. 2009. “Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector.” Administrative Science Quarterly54:123–55.
79.
SmithCraig. 2008. “Consumers as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Pp. 281–302 in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD.New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
SouleSarah. 2009. Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
SouleSarahMcAdamDougMcCarthyJohnSuYang. 1999. “Protest Events: Cause or Consequence of the U.S. Women’s Movement and Federal Congressional Activities, 1956–1979.” Mobilization4:239–56.
82.
SouleSarahOlzakSusan. 2004. “When do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review69:473–98.
83.
StockJamesYogoMotohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” Pp. 80–108 in Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by AndrewsD. W. K.StockJ. H.New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
TerraChoice Environmental Marketing. 2007. “The Six Sins of Greenwashing: A Study of Environmental Claims in North American Consumer Markets.” Retrieved July 2010 (http://www.terrachoice.com/files/6_sins.pdf).
85.
TverskyAmosKahnemanDaniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science85:1124–31.
86.
Van DykeNellaSouleSarahTaylorVerta. 2004. “The Targets of Social Movements: Beyond a Focus on the State.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change25:27–51.
87.
VasiIon Bogdan. 2009. “Social Movements and Industry Development: The Environmental Movement’s Impact on the Wind Energy Industry.” Mobilization: An International Journal14:315–36.
88.
VasiIon Bogdan. 2011. Winds of Change: The Environmental Movement and the Global Development of the Wind Energy Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
VogelDavid. 2006. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
90.
WaddockSamuelGravesSandra. 1997. “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link.” Strategic Management Journal18:303–319.
91.
WalkerEdwardMartinAndrewMcCarthyJohn. 2008. “Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology114:35–76.
92.
WeberKlausRaoHayagreevaThomasL. G.2009. “From Streets to Suites: How the Anti-Biotech Movement Affected German Pharmaceutical Firms.” American Sociological Review74:106–127
ZaldMayerMorrillCalvinRaoHayagreeva. 2005. “The Impact of Social Movements on Organizations: Environment and Responses.” Pp. 253–79 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisG.McAdamD.ScottR.ZaldM.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
