Increasingly, scholars have come to see the news media as playing a pivotal role in shaping whether social movements are able to bring about broader social change. By drawing attention to movements’ issues, claims, and supporters, the news media can shape the public agenda by influencing public opinion, authorities, and elites. Why are some social movement organizations more successful than others at gaining media coverage? Specifically, what organizational, tactical, and issue characteristics enhance media attention? We combine detailed organizational survey data from a representative sample of 187 local environmental organizations in North Carolina with complete news coverage of those organizations in 11 major daily newspapers in the two years following the survey (2,095 articles). Our analyses reveal that local news media favor professional and formalized groups that employ routine advocacy tactics, mobilize large numbers of people, and work on issues that overlap with newspapers’ focus on local economic growth and well-being. Groups that are confrontational, volunteer-led, or advocate on behalf of novel issues do not garner as much attention in local media outlets. These findings have important implications and challenge widely held claims about the pathways by which movement actors shape the public agenda through the news media.
AderChristine R.1995. “A Longitudinal Study of Agenda Setting for the Issue of Environmental Pollution.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72:300–311.
2.
AgnoneJon. 2007. “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Political Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement.” Social Forces85:1593–1620.
AmentaEdwinCarenNealOlaskySheera JoyStobaughJames E.2009. “All the Movements Fit to Print: Who, What, When, Where, and Why SMO Families Appeared in the New York Times in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review74:636–56.
5.
AndrewsKenneth T.BiggsMichael. 2006. “The Dynamics of Protest Diffusion: Movement Organizations, Social Networks, and News Media in the 1960 Sit-Ins.” American Sociological Review71:752–77.
6.
AndrewsKenneth T.EdwardsBob. 2005. “The Organizational Structure of Local Environmentalism.” Mobilization10:213–34.
7.
AndrewsKenneth T.GanzMarshallBaggettaMatthewHanHahrieLimChaeyoon. 2010. “Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work.” American Journal of Sociology115:1191–1242.
8.
AnsellChristopher. 2003. “Community Embeddedness and Collaborative Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area Environmental Movement.” Pp. 123–44 in Social Movements and Networks, edited by McAdamD.DianiM.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
ArmstrongElizabeth A.BernsteinMary. 2008. “Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory26:74–99.
10.
BaraksoMaryannSchaffnerBryan J.2006. “Winning Coverage: News Media Portrayals of the Women’s Movement, 1969–2004.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11:22–44.
11.
Barker-PlummerBernadette. 2002. “Producing Public Voice: Resource Mobilization and Media Access in the National Organization for Women.” Journalism and Mass Communication79:188–205.
12.
BarrancoJoseWislerDominique. 1999. “Validity and Systematicity of Newspaper Data in Event Analysis.” European Sociological Review15:301–322.
13.
BarrettAndrew W.PeakeJeffrey S.2007. “When the President Comes to Town: Examining Local Newspaper Coverage of Domestic Presidential Travel.” American Politics Research35:3–31.
14.
BaumgartnerFrank R.JonesBryan D.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the U.S.” Journal of Communication40:103–127.
16.
BennettW. LanceLawrenceRegina G.LivingstonSteven. 2006. “None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal.” Journal of Communication56:467–85.
17.
BernsteinMary. 1997. “Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement.” American Journal of Sociology103:531–65.
18.
BerryJeffrey M.1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
BiancoAnthonyRossantJohnGardLauren. 2005. “The Future of the New York Times.” BusinessWeek, January17, pp. 64–72.
20.
BogartLeo. 1981. Press and Public: Who Reads What, When, Where, and Why in American Newspapers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
BraunRobertVliegenthartRens. 2009. “Violent Fan Fluctuations: A Diffusion Perspective to Explain Supporters’ Violence.” Mobilization14:23–44.
22.
BrulleRobert J.1996. “Environmental Discourse and Social Movement Organizations: A Historical and Rhetorical Perspective on the Development of U.S. Environmental Organizations.” Sociological Inquiry66:58–83.
23.
BrulleRobertTurnerLiesel HallCarmichaelJasonJenkinsJ. Craig. 2007. “Measuring Social Movement Organization Populations: A Comprehensive Census of U.S. Environmental Organizations.” Mobilization12:255–70.
24.
BursteinPaul. 1998. “Interest Organizations, Political Parties, and the Study of Democratic Politics.” Pp. 39–56 in Social Movements and American Political Institutions, edited by CostainA.McFarlandA.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
CarrollWilliam K.RatnerR. S.1999. “Media Strategies and Political Projects: A Comparative Study of Social Movements.” Canadian Journal of Sociology24:1–34.
26.
ClaymanSteven E.ReisnerAnn. 1998. “Gatekeeping in Action: Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness.” American Sociological Review63:178–99.
27.
CorbettJulia B.1998a. “The Environment as Theme and Package on a Local Television Newscast.” Science Communication19:222–37.
28.
CorbettJulia B.1998b. “Media, Bureaucracy, and the Success of Social Protest: Newspaper Coverage of Environmental Movement Groups.” Mass Communication & Society1:41–61.
29.
DaltonRussell J.1994. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
DaltonRussell J.KuechlerManfred. 1990. Challenging the Political Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
DianiMarioBisonIvano. 2004. “Organizations, Coalitions, and Movements.” Theory and Society33:281–309.
32.
DianiMarioMcAdamDoug. 2003. Social Movements and Networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
DownsAnthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The ‘Issue Attention Cycle.’” Public Interest28:38–50.
34.
EarlJenniferMartinAndrewMcCarthyJohn D.SouleSarah A.2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology30:65–80.
35.
EdwardsGeorge C.IIIWoodB. Dan. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review93:327–44.
36.
FerreeMyra Marx. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology109:304–344.
FranzosiRoberto. 1987. “The Press as a Source of Sociohistorical Data.” Historical Methods20:5–16.
39.
GaltungJohanRugeMari Holmboe. 1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.” Journal of Peace Research2:64–91.
40.
GamsonWilliam. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadswoth.
41.
GamsonWilliam A.ModiglianiAndre. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology95:1–37.
42.
GamsonWilliam A.WolfsfeldGadi. 1993. “Movements and Media as Interacting Systems.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528:114–25.
43.
GansHerbert J.1979. Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon.
44.
GarciaMario R.StarkPegie. 1991. Eyes on the News. St. Petersburg, FL: The Poynter Institute.
45.
GeorgeLisa M.WaldfogelJoel. 2006. “The New York Times and the Market for Local Newspapers.” American Economic Review96:435–47.
46.
GitlinTodd. 1981. The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
GriffinRobert J.DunwoodySharon. 1995. “Impacts on Information Subsidies and Community Structure on Local Press Coverage of Environmental Contamination.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72:271–84.
48.
HarcupTonyO’NeillDeirdre. 2001. “What is News: Galtung and Ruge Revisited.” Journalism Studies2:261–80.
49.
HedstromPeter. 1994. “Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions.” American Journal of Sociology99:1157–79.
50.
HilgartnerStephenBoskCharles L.1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology94:53–76.
51.
HolmqvistKennethWartenbergConstanze. 2005. “The Role of Local Design Factors for Newspaper Reading Behaviour: An Eye-Tracking Perspective.” Lund University Cognitive Studies, Kungshuset.
52.
HolsanovaJanaRahmHenrikHolmqvistKenneth. 2006. “Entry Points and Reading Paths on Newspaper Spreads: Comparing a Semiotic Analysis with Eye-Tracking Measurements.” Visual Communication5:65–93.
53.
IyengarShantoPetersMark D.KinderDonald R.1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review76:848–58.
54.
JohnsonErik W.2006. “Changing Issue Representation among Major United States Environmental Movement Organizations.” Rural Sociology71:132–54.
55.
JohnsonErik W.2008. “Social Movement Size, Organizational Diversity and the Making of Federal Law.” Social Forces86:967–94.
56.
KanissPhyliss. 1991. Making Local News. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
KemptonWillettHollandDorothy C.Bunting-HowarthKatherineHannanErinPayneChristopher. 2001. “Local Environmental Groups: A Systematic Enumeration in Two Geographical Areas.” Rural Sociology66:557–78.
58.
KennedyMark Thomas. 2008. “Getting Counted: Markets, Media, and Reality.” American Sociological Review73:270–95.
59.
KingBrayden G.SouleSarah A.2007. “Social Movements as Extra-Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effect of Protests on Stock Price Returns.” Administrative Science Quarterly52:413–42.
60.
KnokeDavidMarsdenPeter V.KallebergArne L.2002. “Survey Research Methods.” Pp. 781–804 in The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, edited by BaumJ. A. C.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
61.
KoopmansRuud. 2004. “Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere.” Theory and Society33:367–91.
62.
KoopmansRuudOlzakSusan. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-Wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology110:198–230.
63.
LesterMarilyn. 1980. “Generating Newsworthiness: The Interpretive Construction of Public Events.” American Sociological Review45:984–94.
64.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey L.1987. Urban Fortunes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
MarchiRegina M.2005. “Reframing the Runway: A Case Study of the Impact of Community Organizing on News and Politics.” Journalism6:465–85.
67.
MartinAndrew W.BaumgartnerFrankMcCarthyJohn D.2006. “Measuring Association Populations Using the Encyclopedia of Associations: Evidence from the Field of Labor Unions.” Social Science Research35:771–78.
68.
MazurAllan. 1998. A Hazardous Inquiry: The Rashomon Effect at Love Canal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
MazurAllan. 2009. “American Generation of Environmental Warnings: Avian Influenza and Global Warming.” Human Ecology Review16:17–26.
70.
MazurAllanLeeJintang. 1993. “Sounding the Global Alarm: Environmental Issues in the United States National News.” Social Studies of Science23:681–720.
71.
McCarthyJohn D.2005. “Persistence and Change among Nationally Federated Social Movements.” Pp. 193–225 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisG. F.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM. N.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
McCarthyJohn D.McPhailClarkSmithJackie. 1996. “Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991.” American Sociological Review61:478–99.
73.
McCombsMaxwellShawDonald. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36:1766–87.
74.
McPhailClarkSchweingruberDavidMcCarthyJohn. 1998. “Policing Protest in the United States: 1960–1995.” Pp. 49–69 in Policing Protest, edited by PortaD. D.ReiterH.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
75.
MeyerDavid S.TarrowSidney. 1998. The Social Movement Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
76.
MyersDaniel J.2000. “The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks.” American Journal of Sociology106:173–208.
77.
MyersDaniel J.CanigliaBeth Schaeffer. 2004. “All the Rioting That’s Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968–1969.” American Sociological Review69:519–43.
78.
OliverPamela E.ManeyGregory M.2000. “Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology106:463–505.
79.
OliverPamela E.MyersDaniel J.1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology105:38–87.
80.
OlzakSusan. 1989. “The Analysis of Events in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology15:119–41.
81.
OrtizDavid G.MyersDaniel J.WallsN. EugeneDiazMaria Elena D.2005. “Where Do We Stand With Newspaper Data?” Mobilization10:397–419.
82.
PalmgreenPhilipClarkePeter. 1977. “Agenda-Setting with Local and National Issues.” Communication Research4:435–52.
83.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard. 1977. Poor People’s Movements. New York: Pantheon Books.
84.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
85.
RamosHowardRonJamesThomsOskar N. T.2007. “Shaping the Northern Media’s Human Rights Coverage, 1986–2000.” Journal of Peace Research44:385–406.
86.
RaynerKeithMillerBrettRotelloCaren M.2008. “Eye Movements When Looking at Print Advertisements: The Goal of the Viewer Matters.” Applied Cognitive Psychology22:697–707.
87.
RegerJoStaggenborgSuzanne. 2006. “Patterns of Mobilization in Local Movement Organizations: Leadership and Strategy in Four National Organization for Women Chapters.” Sociological Perspectives49:297–323.
88.
RohlingerDeana A.2006. “Friends and Foes: Media, Politics and Tactics in the Abortion War.” Social Problems53:537–61.
89.
RohlingerDeana A.2007. “American Media and Deliberative Democratic Processes.” Sociological Theory25:122–48.
90.
RoystonPatrick. 2007. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values: Further Update of ICE, with an Emphasis on Interval Censoring.” Stata Journal7:445–64.
91.
RyanCharlotte. 1990. Primetime Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing. Boston, MA: South End Press.
92.
RyanCharlotteAnastarioMichaelJeffreysKaren. 2005. “Start Small, Build Big: Negotiating Opportunities in Media Markets.” Mobilization10:111–28.
93.
SampsonRobert J.McAdamDougMacIndoeHeatherWeffer-ElizondoSimon. 2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology111:673–714.
94.
SchaffnerBrian F.SellersPatrick J.2003. “The Structural Determinants of Local Congressional News Coverage.” Political Communication20:41–57.
95.
SchlozmanKay LehmanTierneyJohn T.1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
96.
SchoenfeldA. ClayMeierRobert F.GriffinRobert J.1979. “Constructing a Social Problem: The Press and the Environment.” Social Problems27:38–61.
97.
SchudsonMichael. 2002. “The News Media as Political Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science5:249–69.
98.
ShawDaron R.SparrowBartholomew H.1999. “From the Inner Ring Out: News Congruence, Cue-Taking, and Campaign Coverage.” Political Research Quarterly52:323–51.
99.
ShoemakerPamela J.1984. “Media Treatment of Deviant Political Groups.” Journalism Quarterly61:66–82.
100.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
101.
SkocpolTheda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.
102.
SkocpolThedaGanzMarshallMunsonZiad. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review94:527–46.
SmithJackie. 1997. “Nonresponse Bias in Organizational Surveys: Evidence from a Survey of Groups Working for Peace.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26:359–68.
105.
SnowDavid A.2004. “Social Movements as Challenges to Authority: Resistance to an Emerging Conceptual Hegemony.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change25:3–25.
106.
SnyderDavidKellyWilliam R.1977. “Conflict Intensity, Media Sensitivity and the Validity of Newspaper Data.” American Sociological Review42:105–23.
107.
SouleSarah A.KingBrayden G.2008. “Competition and Resource Partitioning in Three Social Movement Industries.” American Journal of Sociology113:1568–1610.
108.
StaggenborgSuzanne. 1988. “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement.” American Sociological Review53:585–606.
109.
Standard Rate and Data Service. 2004 to 2005. “SRDS Circulation.” SRDS, Des Plaines, IL.
110.
TannerAndrea H.2004. “Agenda Building, Source Selection, and Health News at Local Television Stations: A Nationwide Survey of Local Television Health Reporters.” Science Communication25:350–63.
111.
TaylorVertaVan DykeNella. 2004. “‘Get Up, Stand Up’: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements.” Pp. 262–93 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
112.
TillyCharles. 1982. “Britain Creates the Social Movement.” Pp. 21–51 in Social Conflict and the Political Order in Modern Britain, edited by CroninJ. E.SchneerJ.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
113.
TillyCharles. 1993–94. “Social Movements as Historically Specific Clusters of Political Performances.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology38:1–30.
Van DykeNellaSouleSarah A.TaylorVerta A.2004. “The Targets of Social Movements: Beyond a Focus on the State.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change25:27–51.
116.
VliegenthartRensOegemaDirkKlandermansBert. 2005. “Media Coverage and Organizational Support in the Dutch Environmental Movement.” Mobilization10:365–81.
117.
WalgraveStefaanVan AelstPeter. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56:88–109.
118.
WalkerEdward T.2009. “Privatizing Participation: Civic Change and the Organizational Dynamics of Grassroots Lobbying Firms.” American Sociological Review74:83–105.
119.
WalkerJack L.1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
120.
WinkelmannRainer. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Count Data. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
121.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
