Self Psychology as a Shift Away from the Paranoid Strain in Classical Analytic Theory

Abstract

Classical psychoanalytic theory has a paranoid strain. There is, in effect, an “evil other”—the id—within each individual that must be tamed in development and confronted and worked through as resistance in treatment. This last has historically endgendered an adversarial relationship between patient and analyst. This paranoid strain came from a paranoid element in Freud’s personality that affected his worldview, his relationships, and his theory. Self psychology offers a different view of development and conflict. It stresses the child’s need for responsiveness from and admiration of caretakers in order to develop a well-functioning self. Though severe behavioral and character problems may result from faults in the process of self-construciton, the essentiial need is not instinctual discharge but connection. Hence the long-assumed opposition between individual needs and social institutions or between patient and analyst is no longer inevitable or universal. Rather, an understanding of the primary need for connection creates both a different interpretive stance and a more cooperative ambience. These changes in theory and technique are traced to Kohut’s personal struggles to emancipate himself from his paranoid mother.