Jane Addams was a social thinker, a public philosopher, and a leader of the settlement house movement in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. She developed a method to understand people from backgrounds radically different from her own. This approach, which she called “sympathetic understanding,” involved a dialogic process that included “perplexity” and inquiry. This process resulted in practical actions that resonated with people in the neighborhood surrounding Hull House, the settlement house she founded in Chicago. It also transformed Addams’s own feeling and thinking. The process is illustrated by the “Devil Baby” tales described in Addams’s work. The relationship of her method to empathy with diverse populations and professional empathy in general is discussed.
AddamsJ., (1896). A modern King Lear. In The Jane Addams Reader, ed. ElshtainJ.B.New York: Basic Books, 2002 pp.163–176.
2.
AddamsJ., (1902). Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002.
3.
AddamsJ. (1908). The Chicago settlement and social unrest. In The Jane Addams Reader, ed. ElshtainJ.B.New York: Basic Books, 2002, pp. 205–223.
4.
AddamsJ. (1910). Twenty Years at Hull-House. New York: Signet Books, 1961.
5.
AddamsJ. (1914a). Immigrant woman as she adjusts herself to American life. In Biennial Convention Office Report (General Federation of Women’s Clubs), pp. 370–374. Jane Addams Papers Microfilm 47:902–907.
6.
AddamsJ. (1914b). A modern Devil Baby. American Journal of Sociology20:117–118.
7.
AddamsJ. (1916a). Devil Baby at Hull-House. Atlantic Monthly118:441–451.
8.
AddamsJ. (1916b). The Long Road of Woman’s Memory. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002.
9.
AddamsJ. (1930). Second Twenty Years at Hull-House. New York: Macmillan.
10.
AronL. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
11.
BacalH.NewmanK.M. (1990). Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Beauboeuf-LafontantT. (2014). Becoming Jane Addams: Feminist developmental theory and the ‘college woman’. Girlhood Studies7:61–78.
13.
BrombergP.M. (1989). Interpersonal psychoanalysis and self psychology: A clinical comparision. In Self Psychology: Comparisons and Contrasts. ed. DetrickD.W.DetrickS.P.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 275–291.
14.
CheonB.KMathurV.A.ChiaoJ.Y. (2010). Empathy as a cultural process: Insights from the cultural neuroscience of empathy. World Cultural Psychiatry Research Review5:32–42.
15.
ConciM. (2010). Sullivan Revisited—Life and Work: Harry Stack Sullivan’s Relevance for Contemporary Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis. Trento, Italy: Tangram Edizione Scientifiche.
16.
DeeganM.J. (2005). Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
17.
DeweyJ. (1902). The child and the curriculum. In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924: Vol. 2. 1902–1903, ed. BoydstonJ.A.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1976, pp. 272–292.
18.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924: Vol. 6. 1910–1911, ed. BoydstonJ.A.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978, pp. 177–356.
19.
DeweyJ. (1939). Creative democracy—the task before us. In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953: Vol. 14. 1939–1941, ed. BoydstonJ.A.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, pp. 224–230.
20.
DeweyJ.M. (1939). Biography of John Dewey. In The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. SchilppP.A.Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 1–47.
21.
DilibertoG. (1999). A Useful Woman: The Early Life of Jane Addams. New York: Scribner.
22.
ElshtainJ.B. (2002). Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. New York: Basic Books.
23.
ElsonM. (1986). Self Psychology in Clinical Social Work. New York: Norton.
24.
FischerM. (2006). Jane Addams. In A Companion to Pragmatism, ed. ShookJ.R.MargolisJ.Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 79–86.
25.
FischerM. (2010). Trojan women and Devil Baby tales: Addams on domestic violence. In Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. HamingtonM.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 81–101.
26.
FischerM. (2011). Interpretation’s contrapuntal pathways: Addams and the Averbuch Affair. Transactions of the Charles Peirce Society47:482–506.
27.
FreiR. (2014). What is cultural psychoanalysis? Psychoanalytic anthropology and the interpersonal tradition. Contemporary Psychoanalysis50:371–394.
28.
FreudS. (1919). The “uncanny.”Standard Edition17:219–256.
29.
Galatzer-LevyR.M.CohlerB.J. (1993). The Essential Other: A Developmental Psychology of the Self. New York: Basic Books.
GreenbergJ.MitchellS.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
GurinP.DeyE.L.HurtadoS.GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review72:330–336.
33.
HamingtonM. (2009). The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
34.
HamingtonM. (2010). Introduction. In Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. HamingtonM.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 1–28.
35.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Vol 1. New York: Dover Publications, 1950.
36.
KnightL.W. (2005). Citizen: Jane Addams and the Struggle for Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
KnightL.W. (2010). Jane Addams: Spirit in Action. New York: Norton.
38.
KohutH. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: An examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association7:459–483.
39.
KohutH. (1977). Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
40.
KohutH. (1982). Introspection, empathy and the semi-circle of mental health. International Journal of Psychoanalysis63:395–407.
41.
KohutH. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMillanG. (2002). Keeping the conversation going: Jane Addams’ rhetorical strategies in “A modern Lear.”Rhetoric Society Quarterly32:61–75.
44.
MeadG.H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. MorrisC.W.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
MetzgerJ. (2009). What Would Jane Say? City-Building Women and a Tale of Two Chicagos. Chicago: Lake Claremont Press.
46.
MitchellS.A. (1986). Roots and status. Contemporary Psychoanalysis22:458–466.
47.
MyerhoffB. (1978). Number Our Days. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48.
OpdyckeS. (2012). Jane Addams and Her Vision for America. Boston: Prentice Hall.
49.
OrnsteinP.H. (2011). The centrality of empathy in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry31:437–447.
50.
PerryH.S. (1982). Psychiatrist of America: The Life of Harry Stack Sullivan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51.
Residents of Hull-House (1895). Hull-House Maps and Papers by Residents of Hull-House, A Social Settlement: A Presentation of Nationalities and Wages in a Congested District of Chicago, together with Comments and Essays on Problems Growing out of Social Conditions. New York: Crowell.
52.
SchneirovR.StromquistS.SalvatoreN., eds. (1999). The Pullman Strike and the Crisis of the 1890s: Essays on Labor and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
53.
SeigfriedC.H. (1996). Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
SeigfriedC.H. (2002a). Introduction. In AddamsJ., Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. ix–xxxviii.
55.
SeigfriedC.H. (2002b). Introduction. In AddamsJ., The Long Road of Woman’s Memory. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. ix–xxxiv.
56.
SeigfriedC.H. (2007). Learning from experience: Jane Addam’s “Education in democracy as a way of life.” In Ethical Visions of Education: Philosophies in Practice, ed. HansenD.T.New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 83–94.
57.
SherrickR. (1986). Their fathers’ daughters: The autobiographies of Jane Addams and Florence Kelley. American Studies27:39–53.
58.
SpainD. (2001). How Women Saved the City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
SteeleC.M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi and Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us. New York: Norton.
60.
SullivanH.S. (1940). Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry. New York: Norton.
61.
TolpinM. (1993). The unmirrored self. Annual of Psychoanalysis21:157–177.
62.
TolpinM. (1997a). Compensatory structures: Paths to the restoration of the self. In Conversations in Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol.13, ed. GoldbergA.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 3–19.
63.
TolpinM. (1997b). Response to Fosshage. In Conversations in Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 13, ed. GoldbergA.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 29–31.
64.
TolpinM. (2000). “A cure with a defect”: A previously unpublished letter by Freud concerning Anna O. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:357–359.
