Drawing on Norbert Elias’ concept of “figuration,” this article argues against treating armed groups as static, autonomous units (reification) and instead advocates for analyzing forms of political violence as shifting socio-spatial configurations. By analyzing political violence as a dynamic web of interdependencies between actors and their environments, this perspective offers three key advantages: it establishes a morphology based on recurring relational patterns, captures the fluid, processual nature of political violence, and bridges separate research fields. Two empirical episodes are used to illustrate how socio-spatial relations shift and evolve–and contribute to the transformation of the configuration of political violence over time and across space: the Provisional IRA (Irish Republican Army) in Northern Ireland, between 1969 and 1977, and al-Jamaa al-Islamiyya in Egypt, between 1980 and 1998.
Al-BerryK. (2002). La terre est plus belle que le paradis. Paris JC Lattes.
2.
ArjonaA. (2016). Rebelocracy. Cambridge University Press.
3.
BahgatKarimRichardM Medina. An Overview of Geographical Perspectives and Approaches in Terrorism Research. Perspectives on Terrorism, vol. 7, no. 1, 2013, pp. 38–72.
4.
BeanK. (2007). The new politics of Sinn Féin. Liverpool University Press.
5.
BosiL. (2013). Safe territories and violent political organizations. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 19(1), 80–101.
6.
BosiL. (2012). Explaining pathways to armed activism in the provisional IRA, 1969-1972. Social Science History, 36(3), 347–390.
7.
BosiL.MalthanerS. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Processes of collective action. Temple University Press.
8.
BoylanB. (2015). Sponsoring violence: A typology of constituent support for terrorist organizations. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38(8), 652–670.
9.
BurtonF. (1978). The politics of legitimacy. Struggles in a Belfast community. Routledge.
10.
De BaróidC. (2000). Ballymurphy and the Irish War. Pluto.
11.
Della PortaD. (2013). Clandestine political violence. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
12.
EliasN. (1978). What is sociology?Columbia University Press.
13.
EmirbayerM. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
14.
FeldmanA. 1991. Formations of Violence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15.
GaffneyP. D. (1997). Fundamentalist preaching and Islamic militancy in Upper Egypt. In ApplebyR. (Ed.), Spokesmen for the despised: Fundamentalist leaders of the Middle East (pp. 257–293). University of Chicago Press.
16.
Gutiérrez-SanínF.WoodE. J. (2017). What should we mean by “Pattern of Political Violence”? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique. Perspectives on Politics, 15(1), 20–41.
17.
HaenniP. (2005). L’ordre des caïds: Conjurer la dissidence urbaine au Caire. Karthala.
18.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
19.
MalthanerS. (2011). Mobilizing the faithful: The relationship between militant Islamist groups and their constituencies. Campus.
20.
MacStiofainS. (1975). Revolutionary in Ireland. Gordon Cremonesi.
21.
MampillyZ. C. (2011). Rebel rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Cornell University Press.
22.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
23.
MigdalJ. S. (1974). Peasants, politics, and revolution: Pressures toward political and social change in the third world. Princeton University Press.
24.
NichollsW. (2011). Cities and the Unevenness of Social Movement Space: The Case of France’s Immigrant Rights Movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(7), 1655–1673.
25.
O’ConnorF. (2023). Clandestinity and insurgent consolidation: The M-19’s rebel governance in urban Colombia. Political Geography, 105, Article 102930.
26.
O’DochartaighN. (2013). “Bounded by violence: institutionalizing local territories in the North of Ireland. Nationalism and ethnic politics, 19(1), 119–139.
27.
O’DochartaighN. (2022). Deniable contact: back-channel negotiation in Northern Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
ParkinsonS. (2022). Beyond the lines. Social networks and Palestinian militant organizations in Wartime Lebanon. Cornell University Press.
ShesterninaA. (2016). Collective threat framing and mobilization in civil war. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 411–427.
31.
StanilandP. (2014). Networks of rebellion: Explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. Cornell University Press.
32.
SlukaJ. (1989). Hearts and minds, water and fish: Support for the IRA in a Northern Irish ghetto. Emerald.
33.
TillyC. (2003). Collective violence. Cambridge University Press.
34.
TillyC. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
35.
TothJ. (2003). Islamism in Southern Egpyt: A case study of a radical religious movement. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 35, 547–572.
36.
WaldmannP. (1993). Ethnoregionalismus und nationalstaat. Leviathan, 21(3), 391–406.
37.
WeinsteinJ. M. (2007). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge University Press.
38.
Wickham-CrowleyT. (1992). Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: A comparative study of insurgents and regimes since 1956. Princeton University Press.
39.
ZechS.GabbayM. (2016). Social network analysis in the study of terrorism and insurgency: From organization to politics. International Studies Review, 18(2), 214–243.
