This contribution delves into the literature on social movements and collective action to explore the distinctiveness of relational outcomes, a critical yet underexplored aspect in existing studies. By synthesizing findings from diverse studies within the field, the research seeks to identify the unique characteristics and patterns that set relational outcomes apart from other types of movement consequences. Through a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature, this meta-analysis seeks to provide valuable insights into social movement studies, particularly concerning this specific category. The findings have the potential to inform future scholarship, guide empirical investigations, and deepen our understanding of the complex mechanisms at work in the outcomes of collective action. By surveying and critically evaluating existing studies, this contribution concludes with a working definition of “relational consequences of collective action,” the significance of which will be further explored in the empirical contributions presented in the Special Issue.
AmentaE.AndrewsK. T.CarenN. (2018). The political institutions, processes, and outcomes movements seek to influence. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 447–465). John Wiley & Sons.
2.
AmentaE.HalfmannD.YoungM. (1999). The strategies and contexts of social protest: Political mediation and the impact of the Townsend Movement in California. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.1.y66180053qg16252
AuyeroJ.HernandezM.StittM. (2019). Grassroots activism in the belly of the beast: A relational account of the campaign against urban fracking in Texas. Social Problems, 66(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx035
5.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
6.
BarrettG.DitzelM.JelvezA.ReadL. (2005). «Nadie es Profeta en su Tierra»: Community, civil society, and intervening institutions in rural Chile. Human Organization, 64(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.64.1.m4eavl32d33jmx3h
7.
BeamishT. D.LuebbersA. J. (2009). Alliance building across social movements: Bridging difference in a peace and justice coalition. Social Problems, 56(4), 647–676.
8.
BeckwithK. (2016). All is not lost: The 1984-85 British miners’ strike and mobilization after defeat. In BosiL.GiugniM.UbaK. (Eds.), The consequences of social movements (pp. 41–65). Cambridge University Press.
9.
BernsteinS. (2011). Interracial activism in the Los Angeles Community Service Organization: Linking the World War II and civil rights eras. Pacific Historical Review, 80(2), 231–267. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2011.80.2.231
10.
BiasL. (2019). NGOisation and generational divides in Serbia’s feminist movement. Womens Studies International Forum, 77, Article 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102292
11.
BorghiR. (2020). Decolonialità e privilegio: Pratriche femministe e critica al sistema-mondo. Meltemi.
12.
BosiL. (2016). Social movements and interrelated effects: The process of social change in the post-movement lives of provisional IRA volunteers. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 74(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.047
13.
BosiL.GiugniM.UbaK. (2016). The consequences of social movements. Cambridge University Press.
BursztynL.CantoniD.YangD.YuchtmanN.ZhangY. (2021). Persistent political engagement: Social interactions and the dynamics of protest movements. American Economic Review-Insights, 3(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20200261
16.
ClemensE. S. (1998). To move mountains: Collective action and the possibility of institutional change. In GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC. (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 109–123). Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
ColeyJ. S.RaynesD. K. T.DasD. (2020). Are social movements truly social? The prosocial and antisocial outcomes of social movements. Sociology Compass, 14(8), Article e12820. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12820
18.
CooperH. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104.
19.
CrossleyN. (2010). Towards relational sociology. Routledge.
20.
CrossleyN. (2016). Networks, interaction, and conflict: A relational sociology of social movements and protest. In RooseJ.DietzH. (Eds.), Social theory and social movements: Mutual inspirations (pp. 155–173). Springer.
21.
DengF. (1997). Information gaps and unintended outcomes of social movements: The 1989 Chinese student movement. American Journal of Sociology, 102(4), 1085–1112. https://doi.org/10.1086/231040
22.
DépelteauF. (2018a). From the concept of ‘trans-action’ to a process-relational sociology. In DépelteauF. (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 499–519). Springer.
23.
DépelteauF. (2018b). The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology. Springer.
24.
DianiM. (1997). Social movements and social capital: A network perspective on movement outcomes. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.2.2.w6087622383h4341
25.
DianiM. (2003). Leaders or brokers? Positions and influence in social movement networks. In DianiM.McAdamD. (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 105–122). Oxford University Press.
26.
DianiM. (2015). The cement of civil society: Studying networks in localities. Cambridge University Press.
27.
DianiM.McAdamD. (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press.
28.
EarlJ. (2000). Methods, movements, and outcomes. In CoyP. G. (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (pp. 3–25). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
29.
EmirbayerM. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
30.
EvansR.KayT. (2008). How environmentalists «Greened» trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 970–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300605
31.
EynaudP.JuanM.MoureyD. (2018). Participatory art as a social practice of commoning to reinvent the right to the city. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0006-y
32.
GamsonW. A. (1990 [1975]). The strategy of social protest. Dorsey.
33.
GamsonW. A. (2002). Talking politics (Transferred to digital printing). Cambridge University Press.
34.
GarniA.WeyherL. (2018). Brewing coffee party activism in tea party territory: Faith and politics in Rural America. Sociological Spectrum, 38(4), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2018.1502107
35.
GiugniM.GrassoM. T. (2019). Economic outcomes of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 466–481). John Wiley & Sons.
36.
GuptaD. (2009). The power of incremental outcomes: How small victories and defeats affect social movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.14.4.mw77710825j7g023
37.
HaddenJ.TarrowS. (2007). Spillover or spillout? The global justice movement in the United States after 9/11. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.12.4.t221742122771400
38.
HardyK.CruzK. (2019). Affective organizing: Collectivizing informal sex workers in an intimate union. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218794795
39.
JasperJ.DuyvendakJ. W. (2015). Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest. Amsterdam University Press.
40.
JasperJ.Elliott-NegriL.Jabola-CarolusI.KaganM.MahlbacherJ.WeisskircherM.ZhelninaA. (2022). Gains and losses: How protestors win and lose. Oxford University Press.
41.
JiangJ.KorczynskiM. (2023). The role of community organisations in the collective mobilisation of migrant workers: The importance of a ‘community’-oriented perspective. Work Employment and Society, 38(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221138008
42.
KolbF. (2007). Protest and opportunities: The political outcomes of social movements. Campus Verlag.
43.
LeachC. W.Van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
44.
LudersJ. (2010). The civil rights movement and the logic of social change. Cambridge University Press.
45.
MarangudakisM. (2002). New social movements: Between civil society and communitarianism. Sociological Spectrum, 22(1), 41–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/027321701753284288
46.
McAdamD. (2003). Beyond structural analysis: Toward a more dynamic understanding of social movements. In DianiM.McAdamD. (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 281–298). Oxford University Press.
47.
McAdamD. (2013). Initiator and spin-off movements. In della PortaD. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. John Wiley & Sons.
48.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1988). Social movements. In SmelserN. J. (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 695–737). Sage Publications.
49.
McCannM. W. (1991). Legal mobilization and social reform movements: Notes on theory and its application. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 11, 225–254.
50.
MengistW.SoromessaT.LegeseG. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, Article 100777.
MixT. L. (2011). Rally the people: Building local-environmental justice grassroots coalitions and enhancing social capital. Sociological Inquiry, 81(2), 174–194.
PassyF.MonschG.-A. (2018). Biographical consequences of activism. In SnowD. A. (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 499–514). John Wiley & Sons.
55.
PivenF. F.ClowardR. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail (2nd ed.). Vintage.
56.
PizzornoA. (2007). Il velo della diversità: studi su razionalità e riconoscimento. Feltrinelli.
57.
RoseF. (2000). Coalitions across the class divide: Lessons from the labor, peace, and environmental movements. Cornell University Press.
58.
RothS. (2021). Intersectionality and coalitions in social movement research—A survey and outlook. Sociology Compass, 15(7), Article e12885. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12885
59.
SuhD. (2014). What happens to social movements after policy success? Framing the unintended consequences and changing dynamics of the Korean women’s movement. Social Science Information, 53(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413510989
60.
TarrowS. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (Rev. & updated 3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
61.
TattersallA. (2006). Powerful community relationships and union renewal in Australia. Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations, 61(4), 589–614. https://doi.org/10.7202/014762ar
62.
TillyC. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC. (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 253–270). University of Minnesota Press.
63.
TindallD. B.CormierJ.DianiM. (2012). Network social capital as an outcome of social movement mobilization: Using the position generator as an indicator of social network diversity. Social Networks, 34(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.007
64.
TrontoJ. C. (2009). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
65.
UseemB.GoldstoneJ. A. (2022). The paradox of victory: Social movement fields, adverse outcomes, and social movement success. Theory and Society, 51(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09460-2
66.
Van DykeN.AmosB. (2017). Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, 11(7), Article e12489. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12489
67.
Van DykeN.TaylorV. (2018). The cultural outcomes of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 482–498). John Wiley & Sons.
68.
VieiraA.QuackS. (2016). Trajectories of transnational mobilization for indigenous rights in Brazil. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(4), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020160403
69.
WhittierN. (2004). The consequences of social movements for each other. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 531–551). John Wiley & Sons.
70.
WillowA. (2012). Re(con)figuring alliances: Place membership, environmental justice, and the remaking of indigenous-environmentalist relationships in Canada’s Boreal Forest. Human Organization, 71(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.71.4.x267775756735078
71.
ZaccaroS. J.BlairV.PetersonC.ZazanisM. (1995). Collective efficacy. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 305–328). Springer US.
72.
ZumetaL.BobowikM.BasabeN.WlodarczykA. (2022). Participation in multicultural awareness-raising community actions: Positive effects on well-being and group efficacy. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 28(3), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000426
73.
ZumetaL.Castro-AbrilP.MéndezL.PizarroJ.WlodarczykA.BasabeN.Navarro-CarrilloG.Padoan-De LucaS.da CostaS.Alonso-ArbiolI.Torres-GómezB.CakalH.DelfinoG.TechioE.AlzugarayC.BilbaoM.VillagránL.López-LópezW.Ruiz-PérezJ.. . . PintoI. (2020). Collective effervescence, self-transcendence, and gender differences in social well-being during 8 march demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 607538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607538
