Does a Negative Event Impact Legitimacy?

Abstract

Legitimacy is a must for organizational success. Hence, those organizations able to gain legitimacy can increase effectiveness during periods of crisis or threats. Based on organizational perception management, which focuses its attention on those actions that aim to influence audiences’ perceptions of an organization. This paper presents multiple experiments to understand how different strategies executing verbal accounts can influence people’s perceptions of legitimacy. Results demonstrate that a threatening event will negatively affect legitimacy perception, whatever the response of the organization is. However, verbal accounts are also an important organizational perception management tactic to impact the perceptions of legitimacy during these threatening situations, as a defensive response will have a worse behavior on perceived legitimacy than the accommodative one. Furthermore, the type of event will also have a direct influence on certain dimensions of legitimacy, opening a wide range of actions to be taken depending on the characteristics of the event.

Keywords

organizational legitimacy organizational perception management negative event verbal accounts experimental design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aerts

Cormier

. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 1–27.

Aldrich

H. E.

Fiol

C. M.

(1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

Anastasi

Urbina

. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Ashforth

B. E.

Gibbs

B. W

. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.

Baird

Gangl

. (2006). Shattering the myth of legality: The impact of the media’s framing of supreme court procedures on perceptions of fairness. Journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, 27(4), 597–614.

Billiet

Swyngedown

Waege

. (2004). Attitude strength and response stability of a quasi-balanced political alienation scale in a panel study. In Saris

W. E.

Sniderman

P. M.

(Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 268–293). Princeton University Press.

Burdein

Lodge

Taber

. (2006). Experiments on the automaticity of political beliefs and attitudes. Journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, 27(3), 359–371.

Carter Hill

Griffiths

Lim

. (2011). Principles of econometrics (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Castelló

Lozano

. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rethoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 11–29.

10.

Cunningham

. (2021). Causal inference: The mixtape. Yale University Press.

11.

Deephouse

D. L.

Suchman

M. C

. (2008). “Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism”. In Greenwood

Oliver

Sahlin

Suddaby

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE.

12.

Del-Castillo-Feito

Blanco-González

González-Vázquez

. (2019). The relationship between image and reputation in the Spanish public university. European Research on Management & Business Economics, 25(2), 87–92.

13.

Del-Castillo-Feito

Díez-Martín

Blanco-González

. (2021). The effect of implementing environmental policies and employees’ environmental training in multinational companies’ legitimacy level in emerging countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 312(20), 127817.

14.

Díez Martín

Blanco-González

Prado Román

. (2010). Legitimidad como factor clave del éxito organizativo. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(3), 127–143.

15.

Díez-Martín

Blanco-González

Díez-de-Castro

. (2021). Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept. The jungle of organizational legitimacy, European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27, 100131.

16.

DiMaggio

P. J.

Powell

. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

17.

Elsbach

K. D

. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the california cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57–88.

18.

Elsbach

K. D

. (2007). Organizational perception management. Organization and Management Series. Routledge.

19.

Elsbach

K. D.

Sutton

R. L.

Principe

K. E

. (1998). Averting expected challenges through anticipatory impression management: A study of hospital billing. Organizational Science 9(1), 1–118.

20.

Fridkin

K. L.

Kenney

P. J

. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325.

21.

Geer

J. G

. (2012). The news media and the rise of negativity in presidential campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(3), 422–427.

22.

Ginzel

L. E.

Kramer

R. M.

Sutton

. (1992). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 227–266.

23.

Glaser

. (2006). Public support for political compromise on a volatile racial issue: Insight from the survey experiment. Journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, 27(3), 423–439.

24.

Hair

Black

Babin

Anderson

Tatham

. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

25.

Levi

Sacks

Tyler

. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375.

26.

Louw

. (2005). The media and political process. SAGE Publications.

27.

Massey

J. E

. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153–183.

28.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In Powell

W. W.

DiMaggio

P. J.

(Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). University of Chicago Press.

29.

O’Brien

(2010) Stuck in the middle: Maintaining the organizational legitimacy of the regional environmental center. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(3), 339–357.

30.

Payne

Blanco-González

Miotto

del-Castillo

. (2021). Consumer ethicality perception and legitimacy: Competitive advantages in COVID-19 crisis. American Behavioral Scientist.

31.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R

. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.

32.

Scott

W. R

. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–451.

33.

Scott

W. R

. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE.

34.

Suchman

M. C

. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

35.

Suddaby

Greenwood

. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35–67.

36.

Thomas

T. E

. (2005). Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 186–197.

37.

Toussaint

Cabanelas

González-Alvarado

T. E

. (2021). What about the consumer choice? The influence of social sustainability on consumer’s purchasing behavior in the food value chain. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100134.

38.

Yang

Kim

Min

Hernandez-Calderon

. (2020). Effects of retailers’ service quality and legitimacy on behavioral intention: The role of emotions during COVID-19. Service Industries Journal, 41(1/2), 1–23.