External shocks constitute ideal moments for exploring the creation of new institutions as well as changes within existing ones. This paper treats the influx of Syrian refugees into Turkish urban centers as a critical juncture and investigates the changes in the local governance bodies as a result. Based on interviews and focus group discussions with administrative and nongovernmental actors involved in the local response to refugees, we explore the factors that contributed to the emergence of new institutions within municipalities and their institutionalization as bodies able to resist changes of municipal mayors across elections. We investigate how the newly created institutions matter for refugee policy response in looking at various host cities before and after the 2019 local elections. We argue that actual change in the way institutions operate takes place in municipalities (and their respective departments within) that have managed to institutionalize their refugee response through innovative and sustainable policy initiatives that can spill over to areas of policymaking other than refugee response, which invest in building capacity and multilevel partnerships.
AguitonS. A.CabaneL.CornilleauL. (2019). Politiques de la «mise en crise». Critique Internationale, (4), 9–21.
2.
BazurliR. (2019). Local governments and social movements in the “refugee crisis”: Milan and Barcelona as “cities of welcome”. South European Society and Politics, 24(3), 343–370.
3.
BazurliR.KaufmannD. (2022). Insurgent asylum policies in European cities: A multi-level governance perspective. Urban Affairs Review, 59(4), 1129–1159.
4.
BettsA.MemisogluF.AliA. (2021). What difference do mayors make? The role of municipal authorities in Turkey and Lebanon’s response to Syrian refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa011
5.
CantatC.PécoudA.ThiolletH. (2025). Migration as crisis. American Behavioral Scientist, 69(6), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231182889
6.
CaponioT.BorkertM. (Eds.), 2010. The local dimension of migration policymaking. Amsterdam University Press.
7.
CaponioT.Jones-CorreaM. (2018). Theorising migration policy in multilevel states: The multilevel governance perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(12), 1995–2010.
8.
CernaL. (2016). The crisis as an opportunity for change? High-skilled immigration policies across Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(10), 1610–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1162355
9.
de GraauwE.VermeulenF. (2016). Cities and the politics of immigrant integration: A comparison of Berlin, Amsterdam, New York City, and San Francisco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 989–1012.
10.
Demirtas-BagdonasÖ. (2014). Reading Turkey’s foreign policy on Syria: The AKP’s construction of a great power identity and the politics of Grandeur. Turkish Studies, 15(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.890412
ErdoğanM. M. (2017). Urban Refugees from ‘“Detachment” to “Harmonization”—Syrian Refugees and Process Management of Municipalities: The Case of İstanbul. Marmara Municipalities Union, Migration Policy Workshop (MAGA).
ErdoğanM. M. (2020). “Securitization from Society” and “Social Acceptance”: Political party-based approaches in Turkey to Syrian Refugees. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Özel Sayı: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Göçü Yeniden Değerlendirmek, pp. 73–92.
GsirS.LafleurJ.-M.StanekM. (2016). Migration policy reforms in the context of economic and political crises: The case of Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(10), 1651–1669. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1162352
17.
GuiraudonV.JoppkeC. (Eds.) (2001). Controlling a new migration world. Routledge.
18.
İçduyguA.MilletE. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey; Insecure lives in an environment of pseudo-integration. Global Turkey in Europe Working Paper, no. 13 (August). http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_13.pdf.
19.
KayaA. (2021). Syrian migration and municipal experiences in Turkey: Inclusive social services, RESLOG Local Governance and Migration Series. SKL International.
20.
KrzyżanowskiM.TriandafyllidouA.WodakR. (2018). The mediatization and the politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
MemişoğluF.YavçanB. (2022). Beyond ideology—A comparative analysis of how local governance can expand National Integration Policy: The case of Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(3), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2020.1819780
25.
MescoliE. (2021). Multi-level governance and sanctuary cities: The case of Liège (Belgium) and undocumented migrants. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 19(3), 287–300.
26.
OvinkH.BoeijengaJ. (2018). Too big: Rebuild by design: A transformative approach to climate change. Nai010 Publishers.
27.
PaulR. (2016). Negotiating varieties of capitalism? Crisis and change in contemporary British and German labour migration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(10), 1631–1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1162357
PiersonP. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
30.
PolatR. K.LowndesV. (2022). How does multi-level governance create capacity to address refugee needs, and with what limitations? An analysis of municipal responses to Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab101
RoosC.ZaunN. (2016). The Global Economic Crisis as a critical juncture? The crisis’s impact on migration movements and policies in Europe and the U.S. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(10), 1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1162351
33.
SpencerS. (2020). Cities breaking the mould? Municipal inclusion of irregular migrants in Europe. In TriandafyllidouA.SpencerS. (Eds.), Migrants with irregular status in Europe evolving conceptual and policy challenges (pp. 187–205). Springer International Publishing.
34.
StrangA.AgerA. (2010). Refugee integration: Emerging trends and remaining agendas. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq046
35.
StreeckW.ThelenK. (2005). Institutional change in advanced political economies. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Introduction, Oxford University Press.
UNHCR (2021). Operational data portal refugee situations: Turkey- mapping of municipal support by partners, the UN Refugee Agency. https://data.unhcr.org/en/dataviz/75#
ZaunN.RoosC.GülzauF. (2016). Circumventing deadlock through venue-shopping: Why there is more than just talk in US immigration politics in times of economic crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(10), 1590–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1162356
