How Constructions of Interpersonal Responsibility Shape Undergraduate Student Networks in Times of Social Distancing

Abstract

Since Spring 2020, college students have experienced rapid and unpredictable shifts in their social and academic worlds. As institutions implemented social distancing policies, students had to navigate unstable norms related to peer interaction while negotiating what it meant to act responsibly to ensure their own safety and help their communities. Drawing on a network-based approach to pro-social behavior, we conducted a study of undergraduate students’ frequent interaction networks at one research university during Fall 2020 to better understand how students constructed and were influenced by their peer relationship patterns. We observed a typology of student relationship patterns based on the structure and physical location of relationships. This typology had important implications for how students assessed risk and expressed care. While students engaged in different behaviors related to social distancing, they all believed they were making a concerted effort to keep their frequent contacts safe.

Keywords

social networks socio-academic relationships campus life pro-social behavior COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

E. A.

Hamilton

L. T.

(2015). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Harvard University Press.

Aucejo

E. M.

French

Ugalde Araya

M. P.

Zafar

(2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271

Barnhardt

C. L.

Sheets

J. E.

Pasquesi

(2015). You expect what? Students’ perceptions as resources in acquiring commitments and capacities for civic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 56, 622–644.

Benson

J. E.

Lee

E. M.

(2020). Geographies of campus inequality: Mapping the diverse experiences of first-generation students. Oxford University Press.

Biancani

McFarland

D. A.

(2013). Social networks research in higher education. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 27, 151–215. Springer.

Bidart

Charbonneau

(2011). How to generate personal networks: Issues and tools for a sociological perspective. Field Methods, 23(3), 266–286.

Bidart

Degenne

Grossetti

(2020). Living in networks: The dynamics of social relations (Vol. 49). Cambridge University Press.

Broadhurst

Martin

G. L.

(2014). Part of the “establishment”? Fostering positive campus climates for student activists. Journal of College and Character, 15, 75–86.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

10.

Bronfenbrenner

(1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In Wozniak

R. H.

Fischer

K. W.

(Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647). American Psychological Association.

11.

Bronfenbrenner

(2005). Making human beings human: Biological perspectives on human development. SAGE.

12.

Brown

(2019). The push and pull of social gravity: How peer relationships form around an undergraduate science lecture. Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0112

13.

Chirikov

Soria

K. M.

Horgos

Jones-White

(2020). Undergraduate and graduate students’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. SERU Consortium, University of California – Berkeley, University of Minnesota. https://cshe.berkeley.edu/seru-covid-survey-reports

14.

Eisenberg

(1992). The caring child. Harvard University Press.

15.

Elmer

Mepham

Stadtfeld

(2020). Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS One, 15(7), e0236337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236337

16.

Gilligan

(1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

17.

Goldrick-Rab

Coca

Kienzl

Welton

C.R.

Dahl

Magnelia

(2020). #Realcollege during the pandemic. The Hope Center for College, Community, and Justice. https://hope4college.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Hopecenter_RealCollegeDuringthePandemic.pdf

18.

Hollstein

(2014). Mixed methods social network research: An introduction. In Domínguez

Hollstein

(Eds.), Mixed methods social networks research (pp. 3–34). Cambridge University Press.

19.

Hunt

Gibson

G. C.

Vander Horst

Cleveland

K. A.

Wawrosch

Granot

Kuhn

Woolverton

C. J.

Hughes

J. W.

(2021). Gender diverse college students exhibit higher psychological distress than male and female peers during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 8(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000461

20.

Hyne

S. H.

Thompson

C. D.

(2020). The COVID cohort: Student transition to university in the face of a global pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3381–3385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00769

21.

Israel

Koester

B. P.

McKay

T. A.

(2020). Campus connections: Student and course networks in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 45, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09497-3

22.

Laumann

E. O.

Marsden

P. V.

Prensky

(1989). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Freeman

L. C.

Romney

A. K.

White DR

D. R.

(Eds.), Research methods in social network analysis (pp. 61–88). Transaction Publishers.

23.

Lott

J. L.

(2013). Predictors of civic values: Understanding student-level and institutional-level effects. Journal of College Student Development, 54(1), 1–16.

24.

McCabe

J.M.

(2016). Connecting in college: How friendship networks matter for academic and social success. The University of Chicago Press.

25.

McTighe Musil

. (2013). Overview of the core commitments initiative. In Reason

R. D.

(Ed.), Developing and assessing personal and social responsibility in college (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 164) (pp. 5–11). Jossey-Bass.

26.

Moffatt

(1989). Coming of age in New Jersey: College and American culture. Rutgers University Press.

27.

National Student Clearinghouse. (2020). Research center’s 2020 reports reveal college enrollment trends. https://www.studentclearinghouse.org/nscblog/research-centers-2020-reports-reveal-college-enrollment-trends/

28.

Nespor

(2014). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Routledge.

29.

Park

J. J.

Denson

(2013). When race and class both matter: The relationship between socioeconomic diversity, racial diversity, and student reports of cross-class interaction. Research in Higher Education, 54(7), 725-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9289-4

30.

Park

J. J.

Denson

Bowman

N. A.

(2013). Does socioeconomic diversity make a difference? Examining the effects of racial and socioeconomic diversity on the campus climate for diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 466-496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212468290

31.

Penner

L. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

Piliavin

J. A.

Schroeder

D. A.

(2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141

32.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge University Press.

33.

Ramkissoon

(2020). COVID 19 place confinement, pro-social, pro-environmental behaviors, and residents’ wellbeing: A new conceptual framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02248

34.

Reason

R. D.

Ryder

A. J.

Kee

(2013). Higher education’s role in educating for personal and social responsibility: A review of existing literature. In Reason

R. D.

(Ed.), Developing and assessing personal and social responsibility in college (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 164) (pp. 13–22). Jossey-Bass.

35.

Renn

K. A.

Arnold

K. D.

(2003). Reconceptualizing research on peer culture. Journal of Higher Education, 74(3), 261–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804269941

36.

Smith

R. A.

(2015). Magnets and seekers: A network perspective on academic integration inside two residential communities. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 893-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777388

37.

Smith

R. A.

(2018). Connective segregation: Residential learning communities as networks of engagement. The Review of Higher Education, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0025

38.

Smith

R. A.

Brown

M. G.

Grady

K. A.

Sowl

Schulz

J. M.

(2022). Patterns of undergraduate student interpersonal interaction network change during the COVID-19 pandemic. AERA Open, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211073160

39.

Tasso

A. F.

Sahin

N. H.

San Roman

G.J.

(2021). COVID-19 disruption on college students: Academic and socioemotional implications. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000996

40.

The Healthy Minds Network, & American College Health Association. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on college student well-being. https://healthymindsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Healthy_Minds_NCHA_COVID_Survey_Report_FINAL.pdf

41.

Trolian

T. L.

Barnhardt

C. L.

(2017). Shaping students’ civic commitments: The influence of college cocurricular involvement. Journal of College Student Development, 58(2), 141–158.

42.

Weeden

K. A.

Cornwell

(2020). The small-world network of college classes: Implications for epidemic spread on a university campus. Sociological Science, 7, 222–241. https://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a9