This special issue examines innovative methods in three areas of protest studies: (1) survey methodology and scaling, (2) the development and assessment of political event data, and (3) methods of contextual analysis. The articles provide new techniques and general methodologies for improving the quality of data that we have about protest, especially in the comparative study of protest.
AlvarezR. M. (Ed.). (2016). Computational social science. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarnesS.KaaseM. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Sage.
3.
BeaulieuE. (2014). Electoral protest and democracy in the developing world. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BeielerJ.BrandtP. T.HaltermanA.SchrodtP. A.SimpsonE. M. (2017). Generating political event data in near real time. In AlwarezR. M. (Ed.), Computational social science (pp. 98-120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626316
5.
BestR. H.CarpinoC.CrescenziM. J. C. (2013). An analysis of the TABARI coding system. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30(4), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213491176
6.
BeyerleinK.BarwisP.CrubaughB.CarneseccaC. (2016). A new picture of protest: The national study of protest events. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 384-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116661574
7.
BiggsM. (2015). Has protest increased since the 1970s? How a survey question can construct a spurious trend. British Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12099
8.
BoscheeE.NatarajanP.WeischedelR. (2017). Automatic extraction of events from open source text for predictive forecasting. In SubrahmanianV. S. (Ed.), Handbook of computational approaches to counterterrorism (pp. 51-67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5311-6_3
DaltonR. (2019). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (7th ed.). Sage/Congressional Quarterly Press.
11.
DaltonR.WelzelC. (Eds.). (2014). The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600002
12.
DavenportC.JohnstonH.MuellerC. M. (Eds.). (2005). Repression and mobilization. University of Minnesota Press.
13.
DavidovE.MeulemanB.CieciuchJ.SchmidytP.BillietJ. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
DianiM.EyermanR. (Eds.). (1992). Studying social movements. Sage.
16.
DursoR.JenkinsJ. C.MartinA.StearmerM. (2018). How to study political activists: A petition survey approach. Social Science Research, 73(July), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.014
17.
FillieuleO.JimenezM. (2003). Appendix A: The methodology of protest event analysis and the media politics of reporting environmental protest events. In RootesC. (Ed.), Environmental protest in Western Europe (pp. 258-279). Oxford University Press.
HeaneyM. T.RojasF. (2015). Party in the street: The antiwar movement and the Democratic Party after 9/11. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084007
22.
HuntingtonS. P. (1982). American politics: The promise of disharmony. Harvard University Press.
23.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
24.
HutterS. (2014). Protest event analysis and its offsprings. In della PortaD. (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 335-367). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0014
25.
IngelhartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
26.
IsaacL. W.ChristiansenL.MillerJ.NickelT. (1998). Temporally recursive regression and social historical inquiry: A example of cross-movement militancy spillover. International Review of Social History, 43(6), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002085900011507X
27.
IsaacL. W.GriffinL. J. (1989). Ahistoricism in time-series analyses of historical process: Critique, redirection and illustrations from U.S. labor history. American Sociological Review, 54(6), 873-890. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095713
28.
JenkinsJ. C. (2020). The dark and light sides of big data: How big data is transforming political sociology. In JanoskiT.de LeonC.MisraJ.MartinI. W. (Eds.), The new handbook of political sociology (pp. 321-352). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108147828.013
29.
JenkinsJ. C.KwakJ. (2018). Measuring participation in demonstrations: An outline for using survey and event data to assess the meaning of “have done” protest. Harmonization: Newsletter on Survey Data Harmonization in the Social Science, 4(2), 12-21.
30.
JenkinsJ. C.MaherT. V. (2016). What should we do about source selection in event data? Challenges, progress, and possible solutions. International Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2016.1130419
31.
JenkinsJ. C.WallaceM. (1996). The generalized action potential of protest movements. Sociological Forum, 11(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408364
32.
JenkinsJ. C.WallaceM.FullertonA. S. (2008). A social movement society? A cross-national analysis of protest potential. International Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659380301
33.
KadivarM. A.CarenN. (2016). Disruptive democratization: Contentious events and liberalizing outcomes globally, 1990-2004. Social Forces, 94(3), 975-996. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov096
34.
KaufmanR. R.HaggardS. (2016). Dictators and democrats: Masses, elites and regime change. Princeton University Press.
35.
KimN. K.KroegerA. M. (2019). Conquering and coercing: Nonviolent anti-regime protests and the pathways to democracy. Journal of Peace Research, 56(6), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319830267
36.
KingG.LoweW. (2003). An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders. International Organization, 57(3), 617-642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573064
37.
KlandermansB.StaggenborgS. (Eds.). (2002). Methods of social movement research. University of Minnesota Press.
38.
KoopmansR.RuchtD. (2002). Protest event analysis. In KlandermansB.StaggenborgS. (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 231-259). University of Minnesota Press.
39.
KriesiH. B.KoopmansR.DuyvendakJ. W.GiugniM. G. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe. University of Minnesota Press.
KrzywickiA.WobckeW.BainM.SchmeidlS.HeapB. (2018). A knowledge acquisition method for event extraction and coding based on deep patterns. In YoshidaK.LeeM. (Eds.), Knowledge management and acquisition for intelligent systems (pp. 16-31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97289-3_2
MeyerD. S.TarrowS. (Eds.). (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
MooreW. H. (2000). The repression of dissent: A substitution model of government coercion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(1), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044001006
OsarioJ.ReyesA. (2017). Supervised event coding from text written in Spanish: Introducing eventus ID. Social Science Computer Review, 35(3), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315625475
49.
RitterE. H.ConradC. R. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenge of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000623
SaundersC. (2014). Anti-politics in action? Measurement dilemmas in the study of unconventional political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 67(3), 574-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914530513
SchrodtP. A. (2015, June25). Comparison metrics for large scale political event data sets [Paper presenation]. The European Political Science Association meetings, Vienna, Austria.
54.
SchrodtP. A.BrackleD. V. (2017). Automated coding of political event data. In SubrahmanianV. S. (Eds.), Handbook of computational approaches to counterterrorism (pp. 23-49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5311-6_2
55.
SolaimaniM.GopalanR.KhanL.BrandtP. T.ThuraisinghamB. (2016). Spark-based political event coding [Conference]. 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Big Data Computing Service Applications. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService.2016.30
TeorellJ. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972-2006. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762727
TuckerJ. A.NaglerJ.MetzgerM. M.BarberaP.Penfold-BrownD.BonneauR. (2016). Big data, social media and protest: Foundations for a research agenda. In AlvarezM. (Ed.), Computational social science: Discovery and prediction (pp. 199-224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316257340.009
WalgraveS.WoutersR.KetelaarsP. (2016). Response problems in the protest survey design: Evidence from fifty-one protest events in seven countries. Mobilization, 21(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086/671X-21-1-83
63.
WangW.KennedyR.LazerD.RamakrishnanN. (2016). Growing pains for global monitoring of societal events. Science, 353(6307), 1502-1503. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6758
WelzelC.DeutschF. (2012). Emancipative values and nonviolent protest: The importance of “ecological” effects. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 465-479. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000421
