Ensuring Success Among First-Generation,Low-Income,and Underserved Minority Students: Developing a Unified Community of Support

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated the value of comprehensive, integrated programs that combine and align several interventions to create a seamless learning environment for undergraduate students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). While there is emerging evidence of the value of these integrated programs for student success, there is little understanding of exactly how and why they are effective. This study of integrated programs at several California State University campuses indicates that successful integrated programs are effective because they create what we term a unified community of support for students, faculty, and staff. A unified community of support leverages structural changes to campus policies and practices to promote individual changes to faculty and staff knowledge, beliefs, actions, and relationships. This combination offers a unique and novel way of both organizing and conceptualizing student support within higher education, as most existing programs are based around either structural changes or individual support, rather than a mutually reinforcing combination of the two.

Keywords

unified community of support structural changes STEM interventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astin

A. W.

Astin

H. S.

(1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences (National Science Foundation). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED362404.pdf

Austin

A. E.

(2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education (National Academies National Research Council, Board on Science Education). Retrieved from https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072578.pdf

Bailey

T. R.

Jaggars

S. S.

Jenkins

(2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Boyatzis

R. E.

(1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bratton

Forshaw

Callinan

Sawchuk

(2007). Work and organizational behaviour: Understanding the workplace. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chaney

B. W.

(2010). National evaluation of Student Support Services: Examination of student outcomes after six years (Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/student-support/final-report.pdf

Chaney

Muraskin

L. D.

Cahalan

M. W.

Goodwin

(1998). Helping the progress of disadvantaged students in higher education: The federal Student Support Services Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 197-215.

Christe

(2013). The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines: A literature review. Journal of STEM Education, 14(3), 22-26.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Eagan

Hurtado

Figueroa

Hughes

(2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2- and 4-Year STEM Degrees, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dhttp://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_088834.pdf

11.

Fairweather

(2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/Xc–Linking_Evidence–Fairweather.pdf

12.

Giddens

(1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

13.

Heugens

P. P.

Lander

M. W.

(2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 61-85.

14.

Hrabowski

F. A.

Maton

K. I.

(1995). Enhancing the success of African-American students in the sciences: Freshman year outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 19-27.

15.

Jackson

(2010). Actors and institutions. In Morgan

Campbell

Crouch

Pedersen

Christensen

P. H.

Whitley

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 63-86). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

16.

Kolenovic

Linderman

Karp

M. M.

(2013). Improving student outcomes via comprehensive supports: Three-year outcomes from CUNY’s Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP). Community College Review, 41, 271-291.

17.

Maton

K. I.

Hrabowski

F. A.

Schmitt

C. L.

(2000). African American college students excelling in the sciences: College and postcollege outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 629-654.

18.

Maton

K. I.

Domingo

M. R. S.

Stolle-McAllister

K. E.

Zimmerman

J. L.

Hrabowski

F. A

III . (2009). Enhancing the number of African-Americans who pursue STEM PhDs: Meyerhoff Scholarship Program outcomes, processes, and individual predictors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(1), 15-37.

19.

Muraskin

(1997). “Best practices” in Student Support Services: A study of five exemplary sites. Follow-up study of Student Support Services programs. Washington, DC: Department of Education.

20.

Myers

R. D.

(2003). College success programs. Boston, MA: Pathways to College Network Clearinghouse.

21.

Nava

M. E.

(2010). Exploring new paths: The first-year experiences for first-generation college students and the impact of participating in comprehensive programs (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271907561_An_Exploration_of_First-Generation_College_Students‘_Career_Development_Beliefs_and_Experiences

22.

Powell

W. W.

DiMaggio

P. J.

(Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

23.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf

24.

Rendon

L. I.

(1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33-51.

25.

Scott

W. R.

(1995). Institutions and organizations. London, England: Sage.

26.

Selznick

(1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.

27.

Seymour

Hewitt

N. M.

(1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.

28.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Stake

R. E.

(2005). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

30.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

(1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1-40.

31.

Ting

S.-M. R.

Grant

Plenert

S. L.

(2000). The Excellence-Commitment-and-Effective-Learning (EXCEL) group: An integrated approach for first-year college students’ success. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 353-360.

32.

Tinto

(2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

33.

Toven-Lindsey

Levis-Fitzgerald

Barber

P. H.

Hasson

(2015). Increasing persistence in undergraduate science majors: A model for institutional support of underrepresented students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(2), 2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-05-0082

34.

Tsui

(2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. Journal of Negro Education, 76, 555-581.

35.

Wao

H. O.

Lee

R. S.

Borman

K. M.

(2010). Climate for retention to graduation: A mixed methods investigation of student perceptions of engineering departments and programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16, 293-317.