This article discusses two main issues: the historical invisibility of the role of animal agriculture in climate change and whether it is useful to include explicit violent images or “moral shock” of farmed animals1 in environmental advocacy campaigns to fight against climate change and environmental devastation. The claim will be explored at two levels: ethical and strategic. According to the current literature available, it will be argued that we have sound arguments to believe that using images of farmed animal suffering (including explicit violent images and moral shocks) is both an ethical and effective approach to reach the end of speciesist oppression and to mitigate climate change.
AlmironN.ColeM.FreemanC. P. (2018). Critical animal and media studies: Expanding the understanding of oppression in communication research. European Journal of Communication, 33, 367-380.
6.
AlmironN.ZoppedduM. (2015). Eating meat and climate change: The media blind spot—A study of Spanish and Italian press coverage. Environmental Communication, 9, 307-325.
BestS. (2014). The politics of total liberation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BoykoffM.SmithJ. (2010). Media presentations of climate change. In Lever-TracyC. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 210-218). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
13.
ColeM.MieleM.HinesP.ZokaeiK.EvansB.BealeJ. (2009). Animal foods and climate change: Shadowing eating practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 162-167.
FariaC. (2012, November). Muerte entre las flores: el conflicto entre el ecologismo y la defensa de los animales no humanos [Death among the flowers: the conflict between environmentalism and the defense of nonhuman animals]. Viento Sur, 125, 67-76.
19.
FisherA. (2017). Theory-neutral arguments for “effective animal advocacy.”Essays in Philosophy, 18(1), 1-14.
HalleyJ. M. (2015). So you want to stop devouring ecosystems? Do the math! In KemmererL. (Ed.), Animals and the environment (pp. 151-162). New York, NY: Routledge.
HribalJ. (2010). Fear of the animal planet: The hidden history of animal resistance. Chico, CA: AK Press.
26.
HuddyL.GunnthorsdottirA. H. (2000). The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: Superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason?Political Psychology, 21, 745-778.
27.
HuntC. (2015). Farm gone factory: Industrial animal agriculture, animal welfare and the environment. In KemmererL. (Ed.), Animals and the environment (pp. 173-185). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
JasperJ. M. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13, 397-424.
29.
JasperJ. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285-303.
30.
JasperJ. M.NelkinD. (2007). The animal rights crusade. In HenslinJ. M. (Ed.), Life in society: Readings to accompany sociology, a down-to-earth approach (pp. 225-232). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
JasperJ. M.PoulsenJ. D. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42, 493-512.
32.
jonesp. (2014). The oxen at the intersection: A collision. New York, NY: Lantern.
33.
JoyM. (2010). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows. San Francisco, CA: Conari Press.
34.
KemmererL. (2015). Eating ecosystems. In KemmererL. (Ed.), Animals and the environment (pp. 186-197). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
KemmererL.DoppB. (2015). A fishy business. In KemmererL. (Ed.), Animals and the environment (pp. 163-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
KemptonW. (1997). How the public views climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 39(9), 12-21.
37.
KhazaalN.AlmironN. (2016). An angry cow is not a good eating experience. Journalism Studies, 17, 374-391.
38.
KoA.KoS. (2017). Aphro-ism: Essays on pop culture, feminism and black veganism from two sisters. New York, NY: Lantern.
39.
LaestadiusL. I.NeffR. A.BarryC. L.FrattaroliS. (2014). “We don’t tell people what to do”: An examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 29, 32-40.
LorenzoniI.LangfordI. (2001). Climate change now and in the future: a mixed methodological study of public perceptions in Norwich (UK). CSERGE Working Paper ECM 01–05. Norwich: CSERGE.
42.
MikaN. (2006). Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces, 85, 915-941.
43.
National Sheriffs’ Association. (2018). Animal cruelty as a gateway crime. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
44.
NibertD. A. (2002). Animal rights, human rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
45.
Nicholson-ColeS. A. (2005). Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communications. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 255-273.
46.
O’NeillS. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum, 49, 10-19.
47.
O’NeillS. J.BoykoffM.NiemeyerS.DayS. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, 412-421.
ScarboroughP.ApplebyP. N.MizdrakA.BriggsA. D. M.TravisR. C.BradburyK. E.KeyT. J. (2014). Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Climatic Change, 125, 179-192.
50.
ScudderJ. N.MillsC. B. (2009). The credibility of shock advocacy: Animal rights attack messages. Public Relations Review, 35, 162-164.
51.
SingerP. (1990). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1975)
StibbeA. (2012). Animals erased: Discourse, ecology, and reconnection with the natural world. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
54.
SullivanN.LongneckerN. (2010). Choosing effective frames to communicate animal welfare issues. In 11th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) in New Delhi, India (pp. 146-150). Retrieved from https://pcst.co/archive/pdf/Sullivan_Longnecker_PCST2010.pdf
55.
SwimJ. K.BloodhartB. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9, 446-468.
WisneskiD. C.SkitkaL. J. (2017). Moralization through moral shock: Exploring emotional antecedents to moral conviction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 139-150.
