This study extends recent work exploring the affordances of social media in organizations by considering how social media may also operate as technologies of accountability. This perspective adopts a performative view of social media use in organizations and recognizes that the technologies not only display communication to organizational members but also, in doing so, potentially increase the accountability of workers. Using a case study of the implementation of a social media system inside a financial services company, this work explores how workers view social media in terms of various forms of accountability. The findings reveal that prior to implementation of the social media system workers expressed concern about the accountability social media would create, and that the reluctance to face the accountability associated with communications led to low use of the social media system.
boydd. m.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
2.
boydd. m.HeerJ. (2006). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (10 pp.). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.394
3.
BregmanA.HaythornthwaiteC. (2001). Radicals of presentation in persistent conversation. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (10 pp.). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926499
4.
BrownS. D.LightfootG. (2002). Presence, absence, and accountability: E-mail and the mediation of organizational memory. In WoolgarS. (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 209-229). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
BundersonS. J. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557-591. doi:10.2307/3556637
6.
CrawfordK. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23, 525-535. doi:10.1080/10304310903003270
7.
DanisC.SingerD. (2008). A wiki instance in the enterprise: Opportunities, concerns and reality In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 495-504). New York, NY: ACM. doi:0.1145/1460563.1460642
8.
DennisA.FullerR.ValacichJ. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 575-600.
9.
DennisA.ValacichJ. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1017-1026). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
10.
DiMiccoJ.MillenD. R.GeyerW.DuganC. (2008, November). Research on the use of social software in the workplace. Paper presented at the Workshop on Social Networking in Organizations, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA.
11.
DiMiccoJ.MillenD. R.GeyerW.DuganC.BrownholtzB.MullerM. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 711-720). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1460563.1460674
12.
DourishP. (2001). Process descriptions as organisational accounting devices: The dual use of workflow technologies. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 52-60). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/500286.500297
EricksonT.KelloggW. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 59-83. doi:10.1145/344949.345004
15.
FarnhamS.KellyS. U.PortnoyW.SchwartzJ. L. K. (2004). Wallop: Designing social software for co-located social networks. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (10 pp.). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265281
16.
FeldmanM. S.MarchJ. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 171-186.
17.
Fuchs-KittowskiF.KlassenN.FaustD.EinhausJ. (2009, September). A comparative study on the use of web 2.0 in enterprises. Paper presented at I-KNOW ’09 and I-SEMANTICS ’09, Graz, Austria.
18.
FulkJ. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921-950.
19.
FulkJ.GouldJ. J. (2009). Features and contexts in technology research: A modest proposal for research and reporting. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 764-770. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01469.x
20.
FullertonL. (2010, November). Web 2.0: Framing a technological concept. Paper presented at the National Communication Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.
21.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies of ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
GarfinkelH.SacksH. (1970). On formal structures of practical action. In McKinneyJ. C.TiryakianE. A. (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337-366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
23.
GlaserB.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
24.
GrudinJ. (2006). Enterprise knowledge management and emerging technologies. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (10 pp.). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.156
25.
HancockJ.TomaC.EllisonN. (2007). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the 2007 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 449-452). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240697
26.
HerringS. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society, 6, 26-36.
27.
HuhJ.BellamyR.JonesL.ThomasJ. C.EricksonT. (2007). Blogcentral: The role of internal blogs at work. In Proceedings of CHI ’07: Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2113-2116). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1240866.1241022
28.
KairamS.BrzozowskiM.HuffakerD.ChiE. H. (2012). Talking in circles: Selective sharing in Google+. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1065-1074). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208552
29.
KochM. (2008, June). CSCW and Enterprise 2.0—Towards an integrated perspective. Paper presented at the 21st Bled eConference eCollaboration: Overcoming Boundaries Through Multi-Channel Interaction, Bled, Slovenia.
30.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
LeonardiP. M. (2011). Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organization Science, 22, 347-369. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0529
32.
LeonardiP. M.BarleyS. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 159-176. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001
33.
LeonardiP. M.TreemJ. W. (2012). Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Information and Organization, 22, 37-59. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.10.003
34.
LernerJ. S.TetlockP. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
35.
LittE. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 330-345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
36.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114-133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
37.
McAfeeA. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization’s toughest challenges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
38.
OrlikowskiW. J.GashD. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 174-207.
39.
OrsattiJ.RiemerK. (2012, December). Identity and self-presentation: From a representational to a performative lens in studying social media engagement in organisations. Paper presented at the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems2012, Geelong, Australia.
40.
PooleE. S.GrudinJ. (2010). A taxonomy of wiki genres in enterprise settings. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (8 pp.). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1832772.1832792
41.
RaethP.SmolnikS.UrbachN.ZimmerC. (2009, August). Towards assessing the success of social software in corporate environments. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2009 conference, San Francisco, CA.
SillinceJ. A. A.SaeediM. H. (1999). Computer-mediated communication: Problems and potentials of argumentation support systems. Decision Support Systems, 26, 287-306. doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00058-5
44.
SlagterR.EfimovaL. (2007, September). Experiences with introducing and using social software in a distributed project team. Paper presented at the I-KNOW Conference, Graz, Austria.
45.
SloopJ. M.GunnJ. (2010). Status control: An admonition concerning the publicized privacy of social networking. Communication Review, 13, 289-308. doi:10.1080/10714421.2010.525476
46.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
SuchmanL. (1994). Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 177-190.
48.
SuchmanL. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56-64. doi:10.1145/223248.223263
49.
TreemJ. W. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79, 23-47. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.646487
50.
TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In SalmonC. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 36, pp. 143-189): London, UK: Routledge.
51.
WaltherJ. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398. doi:10.1080/10570319309374463
52.
WaltherJ.Van Der HeideB.KimS.-Y.WestermanD.Tom TongS. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep?Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
53.
WarrW. A. (2008). Social software: Fun and games, or business tools?Journal of Information Science, 34, 591-604. doi:10.1177/0165551508092259
54.
YardiS.GolderS. A.BrzozowskiM. (2009). Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2071-2080). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1519016
55.
ZammutoR. F.GriffithT. L.MajchrzakA.DoughertyD. J.FarajS. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18, 749-762. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
