Studies of political consumerism among young citizens are a relatively recent development. In this study, the authors use Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory of child development as a first attempt to build an explanatory model of teens’ socialization into political consumption behaviors. Structural equation modeling indicates that certain cultural factors (e.g., church attendance, parent education) influence micro-level systems within which children might acquire political consumer behaviors (including parent-child interaction, school activities related to politics, and online media use). Implications are discussed.
AbramsonP. R. (1977). The political socialization of Black Americans. New York: Free Press.
2.
BachenC.RaphaelC.LynnK.McKeeK.PhilippiJ. (2008). Civic engagement, pedagogy, and information technology on web sites for youth. Political Communication, 25, 290-310.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
4.
BeckU. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Oxford, UK: Polity.
5.
BennettW. L. (1998, December). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture, American Political Science Association. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31, 41-61.
6.
BennettW. L.EntmanR. M. (2000). Mediated politics: An introduction. In BennettW. L.EntmanR. M. (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 1-29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BennettW. L.LagosT. (2007). Logo logic: The ups and downs of branded political communication. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 611, 193-206.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). Making human beings human: Biological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
ChaffeeS.FrankS. (1996). How Americans get their political information: Print versus broadcast. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 48-58.
12.
ChaffeeS.McLeodJ.WackmanD. (1973). Family communication patterns and adolescent political participation. In DennisJ. (Ed.), Socialization to politics: A reader (pp. 391-410). New York: John Wiley.
13.
FeldmanL.PasekJ.RomerJ.JamiesonK. H. (2007). Identifying best practices in civic education: Lessons from the student voices program. American Journal of Education, 114, 75-99.
14.
GidengilE.O’NeillB.YoungL. (2008, August). Her mother’s daughter: The influence of childhood socialization on women’s political engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
15.
GrimmR.DietzN.SpringK.AreyK.Foster-BeyJ. (2005). Building active citizens: The role of social institutions in teen volunteering. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.
16.
HessD. (2000). Developing strong voters through democratic deliberation. Social Education, 64, 293-296.
17.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. G. (1973). The transmission of political values from parent to child. In DennisJ. (Ed.), Socialization to politics: A reader (pp. 391-410). New York: John Wiley.
18.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. G. (1974). The political character of adolescence: The influence of families and schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
JenningsM. K.NiemiR. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
JohnA.KleinJ. G. (2003). “The boycott puzzle”: Consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. Management Science, 49, 1196-1209.
McDevittM.ChaffeeS. H. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19, 281-301.
28.
McFarlandD. A.ThomasR. J. (2006). Bowling young: How youth voluntary associations influence political participation. American Sociological Review, 71, 401-425.
29.
McLeodM.ShahD. V. (2009). Communication and political socialization: Challenges and opportunities for research. Political Communication, 26, 1-10.
30.
McLeodJ. M. (2000). Media and civic socialization of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 45-51.
31.
MichelettiM. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (2006). Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
MichelettiM.StolleD. (2006). Concept of political consumerism. In SherrodLonnie R. (Ed.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 238-250), Westport CT: Greenwood.
34.
MichelettiM.StolleD. (2008). Fashioning social justice through political consumerism, capitalism and the Internet. Cultural Studies, 22, 749-769.
35.
MindichD.T.Z. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don’t follow the news. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
NeilsonL. A.PaxtonP. (2010). Social capital and political consumerism: A multilevel analysis. Social Problems, 57, 5-24.
37.
NiemiR. G.JenningsM. K. (1991). Issues and inheritance in the formation of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 970-988.
OlssonT. (2008). The practices of Internet networking—A resource for alternative political movements. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 659-674.
40.
PasekJ.FeldmanL.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2008). Schools as incubators of Democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Development Science, 12, 26-37.
41.
PattieC.SeydP.WhiteleyP. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443-468.
42.
PlutzerE. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96, 41-56.
43.
RoddickA. (2001). Take it personally: How globalization affects you and powerful ways to challenge it. London: HarperCollins.
44.
SapiroV. (2000, August). Economic activity as political activity. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
45.
ScammellM. (2000). The Internet and civic engagement: The age of the citizen consumer. Political Communication, 17, 351-355.
46.
ShahD. V.McLeodD. M.KimESunY. L.GotleibM. R.HoS. S.BreivikH. (2007). Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientation drive “lifestyle politics.”Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 611, 217-234.
47.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.LeeN. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26, 102-117.
48.
ShaheenM. A. (2008). Use of social networks and information seeking behavior of students during political crises in Pakistan: A case study. International Information & Library Review, 40, 142-147.
49.
ShapiroI.Hacker-CordonC. (1999). Democracy’s edges. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SmetanaJ. G.Campione-BarrN.MetzgerA. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255-284.
51.
StolleD.HoogheM.MichelettiM. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26, 245-269.
52.
VenturaR. (2001). Family political socialization in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 666-691.
53.
WardJ. (2008). The online citizen-consumer: Addressing young people’s political consumption through technology. Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 513-526.
54.
WardJ.GibsonR. M. (2003). Online and on message. Candidate websites in the 2001 general election. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5, 188-205.
55.
WardS.WackmanD. (1971). Family and media influences on adolescent consumer learning. American Behavioral Scientist, 14, 415.
56.
WicksJ. L.MorimotoS.MaxwellA.SchulteS. R.WicksR. H. (2014). Youth political consumerism and the 2012 presidential election: What influences youth boycotting and buycotting?American Behavioral Scientist.
57.
ZureikE.MowshowitzA. (2005). Consumer power in the digital age: A shift in the balance of power brings with it increased potential for influence. Communications of the ACM, 48, 46-51.
