Researchers are beginning to understand that there are some differential effects on students in relation to exposure to part-time faculty; one possible explanation may be differences depending on program area. This study explores whether exposure to part-time faculty differentially affects students’ likelihood of transferring across academic program areas. The findings confirm prior research identifying a negative relationship between students’ instructional time with part-time faculty and their probability of transferring from a community college to a 4-year institution; however, the results indicated no differential effects of exposure to part-time faculty depending on program area. As scholars highlight differences among part-time faculty depending on academic discipline, this research suggests that these differences do not translate into differential effects on students’ likelihood of transferring.
AdelmanC. (2005). Moving into town—and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AkroydD.JaegerA. J.JonesL. C.JackowskiM. (2004). A comparison of access to and use of computer-based instructional technology: A national study of full-time and part-time community college faculty. Community College Review, 32(1), 40-51.
3.
BaldwinR. G.ChronisterJ. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
BensimonE. M.DowdA. C. (2009). Dimensions of the transfer choice gap: Experiences of Latina and Latino students who navigated transfer pathways. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 632-659.
5.
BettingerE.LongB. T. (2004). Do college instructors matter? The effects of adjuncts and graduate assistants on students’ interests and success (NBER Working Paper No. 10370). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BettingerE.LongB. T. (2006). The increasing use of adjunct instructors at public institutions: Are we hurting students?” In EhrenbergR. (Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education? (pp. 51-70). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press for the American Council on Education.
7.
BettingerE.LongB. T. (2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics92(3), 598-613.
8.
BurgessL. A.SamuelsC. (1999). Impact of full-time versus part-time instructor status on college student retention and academic performance in sequential courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23(5), 487-498.
9.
CabreraA. F.BurkumK. R.LaNasaS. M. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: A formula for student success (pp. 154-214). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press for the American Council on Education/Praeger Series on Higher Education.
10.
CabreraA. F.LaNasaS. M.BurkumK. R. (2001). Pathways to a four-year degree: The higher education story of one generation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Center for the Study of Higher Education.
11.
CejdaB. D.RhodesJ. H. (2004). Through the pipeline: The role of faculty in promoting associate degree completion among Hispanic students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(3), 249-262.
12.
CohenA. M. (1991). Deriving a valid transfer rate. In JonesE. B. (Ed.), A model for deriving the transfer rate: Report of the transfer assembly project (pp. 1-15). Washington, DC: Community College Press.
13.
CohenA. M.BrawerF. B. (2003). The American community college (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
15.
College and University Professional Association for Human Resources. (2001). 2000-2001 National faculty salary survey by discipline and rank. Washington, DC: College and University Professional Association for Human Resources.
DoughertyK. J.KienzlG. S. (2006). It’s not enough to get through the open door: Inequalities by social background in transfer from community colleges to four-year colleges. Teachers College Record, 108(3), 452-487.
18.
EaganM. K. (2007). A national picture of part-time community college faculty: Trends and demographics in employment characteristics. New Directions for Community Colleges, 140, 5-14.
19.
EaganM. K.JaegerA. J. (2008). Closing the gate: Contingent faculty in gatekeeper courses. In BraxtonJ. M. (Ed.), The role of the classroom in college student persistence: New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 39-54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
EaganM. K.JaegerA. J. (2009). Part-time faculty at community colleges: Implications for student persistence and transfer. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 168-188.
21.
EhrenbergR. G.ZhangL. (2004). Do tenured and tenure track faculty matter? (NBER Working Paper No. W10695). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
GappaJ. M. (2002). Academic careers for the twenty-first century: More options for new faculty. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 17, pp. 425-475). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
23.
GreenD. W. (2007). Adjunct faculty and the continuing quest for quality. New Directions for Community Colleges, 140, 29-39.
24.
HaegerJ. D. (1998). Part-time faculty, quality programs, and economic realities. In LeslieD. W. (Ed.), The growing use of part-time faculty: Understanding causes and effects (pp. 81-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
HarringtonC.SchibikT. (2004). Caveat emptor: Is there a relationship between part-time faculty utilization and student learning outcomes and retention? (AIR Professional File No. 91). Tallahassee, FL: Association of Institutional Research.
26.
HurtadoS.EaganM. K.CabreraN. L.LinM. H.ParkJ.LopezM. (2008). Training future scientists: Predicting first-year minority student participation in health science research. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 126-152.
27.
JacobsF. (1998). Using part-time faculty more effectively. In LeslieD. W. (Ed.), The growing use of part-time faculty (pp. 9-18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
JacobyD. (2006). Effects of part-time faculty employment on community college graduation rates. Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1081-1103.
29.
JaegerA. J.EaganM. K. (2009). Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on associate’s degree completion. Community College Review, 36(3), 167-194.
30.
JaegerA. J.EaganM. K. (in press). Examining retention and contingent faculty use in a state system of public higher education. Educational Policy.
31.
JaegerA. J.HinzD. (2008). The effects of part-time faculty on first year freshman retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(3), 33-53.
KraemerB. A. (1995). Factors affecting Hispanic student transfer behavior. Research in Higher Education, 36(3), 303-322.
34.
LamportM. A. (1993). Student-faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 28, 971-990.
35.
LeeV. E.FrankK. A. (1990). Students’ characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 178-193.
36.
LevinJ. S. (2001). Globalizing the community college: Strategies for change in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Palgrave.
37.
LevinJ. S. (2007). Multiple judgments: Institutional context and part-time faculty. New Directions for Community Colleges, 140, 15-20.
38.
LevinJ. S.KaterS.WagonerR. L. (2006). Community college faculty: At work in the new economy. New York, NY: Palgrave.
39.
MarshoodN. (1995). Community college administrations and faculty scholarship: A pilot study. Community College Review, 23(1), 51-62.
40.
MerisotisJ. P.PhippsR. A. (2000). Remedial education in colleges and universities: What’s really going on?Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 67-85.
41.
MilemJ. F.BergerJ. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), 387-400.
42.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2005; graduation rates, 1999 and 2002 cohorts; and financial statistics, fiscal year 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
PetersenT. (1985). A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models. American Sociological Review, 50(1), 130-131.
44.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
RoncoS. L.CahillJ. (2004, June). Does it matter who’s in the classroom? Effect of instructor type on student retention, achievement, and satisfaction. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Boston, MA.
46.
RumbergerR. W.ThomasS. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73(1), 39-67.
47.
SchusterJ. H. (2003). The faculty makeover: What does it mean for students? (New Directions for Higher Education No. 123). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
SchusterJ. H.FinkelsteinM. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
Stanton-SalazarR. D.DornbuschS. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 116-135.
50.
TownsendB. K.WilsonK. (2006). “A hand hold for a little bit”: Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 439-456.
51.
UmbachP. D. (2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 91-124.
52.
UmbachP. D. (2008, November). Sex segregation in academic labor markets and equity in faculty pay. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Vancouver, Canada.
