The 1999 Columbine school shooting incident in Colorado gained far more media attention across a broader range of issues than any school violence episode before or since. One might expect that Columbine would have had an influence on public opinion, public policy, and scholarship commensurate with the attention it gained. We find that the event did contribute in a limited but interesting way to scholarship on media framing. But the effect of Columbine on public opinion and the nature and substance of public policy was limited. Attention to school shootings peaked with Columbine, and the attention surrounding that event mostly spurred more rapid implementation of existing policies and tools that were already available to schools. In this article, the authors review first the media and public opinion research generated by Columbine; they then review the public policy research referencing Columbine and evaluate the “lessons” scholars have drawn from that event.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Birkland, T.A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
Birkland, T.A. (2006). Lessons of disaster. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4.
Busenberg, G.J. (2001). Learning in organizations and public policy. Journal of public policy, 21(2), 173-189.
5.
Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 872-892.
6.
Chyi, H.I., & McCombs. M. (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1): 22-35.
7.
Crigler, A.N., Just, M.R., & Neuman, W.R. (1992). Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Del Prete, T. (2000). Unsafe schools: Perception or reality?Professional School Counseling, 3(5), 375-376.
9.
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. The Public Interest, 28, 38-50.
10.
Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
11.
Ferguson, C.J. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78, 309-316.
Gillespie, M. (1999, April 30). Americans have very mixed opinions about blame for Littleton shootings. Retrieved September 16, 2008 , from http://www.gallup.com/poll/3889/Americans-Very-Mixed-Opinions-About-Blame-Littleton-Shootings.aspx
14.
Glaser, Sarah. (1992). Violence in schools. CQ Researcher , 2(34), 785-808. Retrieved July 26, 2008, from CQ Researcher Online, http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre1992091100
15.
Goggin, M.L., Bowman, A., Lester, J.P., & O'Toole, L.J. , Jr. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/ Little, Brown.
16.
Greenya, J., Nolt, S.M., & Weaver-Zercher, D.L. (2007). Amish grace: How forgiveness transcended tragedy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Haider-Markel, D.P., & Joslyn, M.R. (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics , 63(2), 520-543.
18.
Hilgartner, J., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78.
19.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
20.
Koch, K. (2005). Bullying. CQ Researcher, 15(5), 101-124. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.cqresearcher.com
21.
Larkin, R.W. (2007). Comprehending Columbine. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
22.
Lawrence, R.G. (2000). The politics of force: Media and the construction of police brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Lawrence, R.G. (2001). Defining events: Problem definition in the media arena. In Roderick Hart & Bartholemew Sparrow (Eds.), Politics, discourse, and American society: New agendas (pp. 91-110). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
Lawrence, R.G., & Birkland, T.A. (2004). Guns, Hollywood, and criminal justice: Defining the school shootings problem across public arenas. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1193-1207.
25.
Lindsay, M. (1998). Legislative superpredators. Criminal Justice12(Winter), 52-53.
26.
Mansell, W., & Milne, J. (2008, January 25). Nine out of 10 parents say schools are safe. Times Educational Supplement, 4772, 1. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=2570969
27.
May, P.J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331-354.
28.
Muschert, G.W. (2007a). The Columbine victims and the myth of the juvenile superpredator. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(4), 351-366.
29.
Muschert, G.W. (2007b). Research in school shootings. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 60-80.
30.
Muschert, G.W., & Carr, D. (2006). Media salience and frame changing across events: Coverage of nine school shootings, 1997-2001. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 747-766.
31.
National Council of State Legislatures. (2008 ). Select school safety enactments (1994-2001). Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.ncsl.org/programs/cyf/safetyenac.htm
32.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (1999, December 28). Columbine shooting biggest news draw of 1999. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://people-press.org/report/48/columbine-shooting-biggest-news-draw-of-1999
33.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000, April 19). A year after Columbine public looks to parents more than schools to prevent violence. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://people-press.org/report/40/a-year-after-columbine-public-looks-to-parents-more-than-schools-to-prevent-violence
34.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2007, April 4). The NRA's image improves as support for gun control slips. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/443/the-nras-image-improves-as-support-for-gun-control-slips
35.
Redding, R.E., & Shalf, Sarah M. (2001). The legal context of school violence: The effectiveness of federal, state, and local law enforcement efforts to reduce gun violence in schools. Law & Policy, 23(3), 297-343.
36.
Saad, L. (2007, October 11). Shrunken majority now favors stricter gun laws. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/101731/Shrunken-Majority-Now-Favors-Stricter-Gun-Laws.aspx
37.
Scharrer, E., Weidman, L.M., & Bissell, K.L. (2003). Pointing the finger of blame: News media coverage of popular-culture culpability. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 5(2), 49-98.
38.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1975). The semisovereign people. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
39.
Springhall, J. (1998). Youth, popular culture and moral panics: Penny gaffs to gangsta-rap, 1830-1996. New York: St. Martin's.
40.
Tapper, J. (1999a, December 30). The real culprits at Columbine. Salon. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/12/30/guns/
41.
Tapper, J. (1999b, June 4). What did Democrats sacrifice to win gun control?Salon. Retrieved February 5, 2009 , from http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/04/juvenile/index.html
42.
Time, V., & Payne, B.K. (2008). School violence prevention measures: School officials' attitudes about various strategies. Journal of Criminal Justice , 36(4), 301-306.
43.
United States Department of Education. (2004 ). Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act state grants: Guidance for state and local implementation of programs [Draft]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/dvpformula/guidance.doc
44.
Zehr, M.A. (1999, May 19). More schools giving classroom phones a ringing endorsement. Education Week, 18(36), 1.
