Considering the 2004 campaign’s attention to the gender gap in voting between women and men and efforts to turn out the youth vote, this study examines the reactions of 301 female and male young voters to televised political advertisements aired on behalf of the two major party presidential candidates. Specifically, the authors compare how women and men rate each candidate’s overall favorability and individual character traits as well as indicate their vote intention for George W. Bush or John Kerry. The authors find that the gender gap in vote intention is similar to, but larger than, the actual gender gap in voting in 2004, both overall and for young voters. However, assessments of candidate favorability follow the gender gap only for the Democratic candidate.
Banwart, M. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2003). Behind their skirts: Clinton’s appeal to women voters. In R. E. Denton & R. L. Holloway (Eds.), Images, scandal, and communication strategies of the Clinton presidency (pp. 91-112). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
2.
Center for American Women and Politics. (2004a, November 4). Gender gap persists in the 2004 election. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from Rutgers University, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for American Women and Politics Web site: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/%7Ecawp/facts5/html
3.
Center for American Women and Politics. (2004b, November 10). Gender gap in 2004 presidential race is widespread. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from Rutgers University, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for American Women and Politics Web site: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/%7Ecawp/facts5/html
4.
Center for American Women and Politics. (2005a, March). The gender gap: Party identification and presidential performance ratings. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from Rutgers University, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for American Women and Politics Web site: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/%7Ecawp/facts5/html
5.
Center for American Women and Politics. (2005b, March). The gender gap: Voting choices in presidential elections. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from Rutgers University, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for American Women and Politics Web site: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/%7Ecawp/facts5/html
6.
Garramone, G. M. (1984). Voter responses to negative political ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 250-259.
7.
Kaid, L. L. (1994). Political advertising in the 1992 campaign. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign (pp. 111-127). Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
Kaid, L. L. (1995). Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials. In K. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential election campaigns (pp. 131-134). New York: Praeger.
9.
Kaid, L. L. (1997, October). Political television advertising: A comparative perspective on styles and effects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Images of Politics, Amsterdam.
10.
Kaid, L. L. (1998). Videostyle and the effects of the 1996 presidential campaign advertising. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.), The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 143-159). Westport, CT: Praeger.
11.
Kaid, L. L. (1999). Political advertising: A summary of research findings. In B. Newman (Ed.), The handbook of political marketing (pp. 423-438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Kaid, L. L., & Chanslor, M. (1995). Changing candidate images: The effects of political advertising. In K. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 83-97). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
Kaid, L. L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2000). Gender differences in response to televised political broadcasts: A multicountry comparison. Harvard Journal of International Press/Politics, 5(2), 17-29.
14.
Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
15.
Kaid, L. L., & Tedesco, J. (1999). Presidential candidate presentation: Videostyle in the 1996 presidential spots. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election (pp. 209-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Kern, M., & Just, M. (1997). A gender gap among viewers? In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media, and politics (pp. 99-112). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2003). Style and effects of the Bush and Gore spots. In L. L. Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 5-16). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
