A number of place-based policies attempt to deconcentrate poverty, yet not enough is known about how the socioeconomic mix of low-income neighborhoods evolves nor the role of residential mobility in this evolution. This study focuses on changes in low-income neighborhoods as they transpire at the micro level of housing unit turnover. Using a unique panel survey of low-income neighborhoods, the study examines how characteristics of previous occupants, housing units, and neighborhoods affect the chances that units will transition into or out of poverty. Results show that although turnover rates are high, the poverty status of occupants changes infrequently. Occupant, unit, and neighborhood factors help to explain the changes that do occur. Improving low-income neighborhoods is challenging because the poverty status of occupants tends not to change, but there are aspects of the built and social environment that can affect occupancy transitions in ways that reduce poverty concentration.
AurandAndrewReynoldsAngela. 2013. Elderly mobility and the occupancy status of single-family homes. Housing Studies28 (5): 661–81.
2.
BaderMichael D. M.KrysanMaria. 2015. Community attraction and avoidance in Chicago: What’s race got to do with it?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
3.
BayohIsaacIrwinElena G.HaabTimothy. 2006. Determinants of residential location choice: How important are local public goods in attracting homeowners to central city locations?Journal of Regional Science46 (1): 97–120.
ClarkWilliam A.DeurlooMarinus C.DielemanFrans M.1984. Housing consumption and residential mobility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers74 (1): 29–43.
6.
CoultonClaudia J.ChanTsuiMikelbankKristen. 2011. Finding place in community initiatives: Using GIS to uncover resident perceptions of their neighborhoods. Journal of Community Practice19 (1): 10–28.
7.
CoultonClaudia J.TheodosBrettTurnerMargery Austin. 2012. Residential mobility and neighborhood change: Real neighborhoods under the microscope. Cityscape14 (3): 55–89.
8.
CytronNaomi. 2010. Improving the outcomes of place-based initiatives. San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
9.
DeLucaStephanieWoodHollyRosenblattPeter. 2011. How do poor people move?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Las Vegas.
10.
DownsAnthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
EggersFrederick J.MoumenFouad. 2013. Housing adequacy and quality as measured by the AHS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
12.
EllenIngrid Gould. 2000. Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
EllenIngrid GouldHornKarenO’ReganKatherine. 2011. Urban pioneers: Why do higher income households choose lower income neighborhoods?Urban Studies50 (12): 2478–95.
14.
EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherine. 2008. Reversal of fortunes? Lower-income urban neighbourhoods in the U.S. in the 1990s. Urban Studies45 (4): 845–69.
FeijtenPetekeHamMaarten van. 2009. Neighbourhood change . . . reason to leave?Urban Studies46 (10): 2103–22.
17.
FischerMary J.MasseyDouglas S.2004. The ecology of racial discrimination. City and Community3 (3): 221–41.
18.
FreemanLanceBraconiFranck. 2004. Gentrification and displacement: New York City in the 1990s. Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1): 39–52.
19.
GalsterGeorge C.1987. Homeowners and neighborhood reinvestment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
GramlichEdwardLarenDeborahSealandNaomi. 1992. Moving into and out of poor urban areas. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management11 (2): 273–87.
21.
HippJohn R.2012. Segregation through the lens of housing unit transition: What roles do the prior residents, the local micro-neighborhood, and the broader neighborhood play?Demography49 (4): 1285–1306.
22.
HwangJackelynSampsonRobert J.2014. Divergent pathways of gentrification racial inequality and the social order of renewal in Chicago neighborhoods. American Sociological Review79 (4): 726–51.
23.
IhrkeDavid K.FaberCarol S.2012. Geographical mobility: 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
24.
JargowskyPaul A.2013. Concentration of poverty in the new millennium: Changes in prevalence, composition, and location of high-poverty neighborhoods. New York, NY and Camden, NJ: The Century Foundation and the Center for Urban Research and Education, Rutgers-Camden.
25.
KingsleyG. ThomasPettitKathryn L. S.2007. Concentrated poverty: Dynamics of change. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
26.
KrysanMaria. 2008. Does race matter in the search for housing? An exploratory study of search strategies, experiences, and locations. Social Science Research37 (2): 581–603.
27.
KubischAnne C.AusposPatriciaBrownPrudenceDewarTom. 2010. Voices from the field III. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
28.
LeventhalTamaBrooks-GunnJeanne. 2000. The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin126 (2): 309–37.
29.
MarulloSam. 1985. Targets for racial invasion and reinvasion: Housing units where racial turnovers occurred, 1974–77. Social Forces63 (3): 748–74.
30.
NewmanKatheWylyElvin. 2006. The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies43 (1): 23–57.
31.
NechybaThomas J.StraussRobert P.1997. Community choice and local public services: A discrete choice approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics28 (1): 51–73.
32.
O’ConnorAlice. 1999. Swimming against the tide: A brief history of federal policy in poor communities. In Urban problems and community development, eds. FergusonRonald F.DickensWilliam T., 77–138. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
OrfieldMyron. 2002. American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
PendallRolfDaviesElizabethFreimanLesleyPitingoloRob. 2011. A lost decade: Neighborhood poverty and the urban crisis of the 2000s. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
35.
PendallRolfTheodosBrettHildnerKaitlin. Forthcoming. Why high-poverty neighborhoods persist: The role of precarious housing. Urban Affairs Review.
36.
QuigleyJohn M.1985. Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services. Regional Science and Urban Economics15 (1): 41–63.
37.
RapaportCarol. 1997. Housing demand and community choice: An empirical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics42 (2): 243–60.
38.
SampsonRobert J.SharkeyPatrickRaudenbushStephen W.2008. Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (3): 845–52.
39.
SpainDaphne. 1980. Black-to-white successions in central-city housing: Limited evidence of urban revitalization. Urban Affairs Review15:381–95.
40.
TeernstraAnnalies. 2014. Neighbourhood change, mobility and incumbent processes: Exploring income developments of in-migrants, out-migrants and non-migrants of neighbourhoods. Urban Studies51 (5): 978–99.
41.
TemkinKennethRoheWilliam. 1996. Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (3): 159–70.
42.
TheodosBrettCoultonClaudiaBuddeAmos. 2014. Getting to better performing schools: The role of residential mobility in school attainment in low-income neighborhoods. Cityscape16 (1): 61–84.
43.
TurnerMargery AustinEdelmanPeterPoethigErikaAronLaudan. 2014. Tackling persistent poverty in distressed urban neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
44.
TurnerMargery AustinSantosRobertLevyDiane K.WissokerDouglas A.ArandaClaudiaPitingoloRob. 2013. Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012: Full report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
45.
VigdorJacob. 2002. Does gentrification harm the poor?Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (2002):132–82.
