Poor urban communities experience high rates of incarceration and prisoner reentry. This article examines where former prisoners live after prison, focusing on returns to pre-prison social environments, residential mobility, and the role of intermediate sanctions—punishments for parole violations that are less severe than returning to prison—on where former prisoners live. Drawing on a unique dataset that uses administrative records to follow a cohort of Michigan parolees released in 2003 over time, we examine returns to pre-prison environments, both immediately after prison and in the months and years after release. We then investigate the role of intermediate sanctions in residential mobility among parolees. Our results show low rates of return to former neighborhoods and high rates of residential mobility after prison, a significant portion of which is driven by intermediate sanctions resulting from criminal justice system supervision. These results suggest that, through parole supervision, the criminal justice system generates significant residential mobility.
AlexanderMichelle. 2010. The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press.
2.
BinswangerIngrid A.SternMarc F.DeyoRichard A.HeagertyPatrick J.CheadleAllenElmoreJoann G.KoepsellThomas D.2007. Release from prison—A high risk of death for former inmates. New England Journal of Medicine356:157–65.
3.
CadoraEricSwartzCharlesGordonMannix. 2003. Criminal justice and health and human services: An exploration of overlapping needs, resources, and interests in Brooklyn neighborhoods. In Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities, eds. TravisJeremyWaulMichelle. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
4.
ClearTodd. 2007. Imprisoning communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
ClearToddRoseDinaWaringElinScullyKristen. 2003. Coercive mobility and crime: A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Quarterly20 (1): 33–64.
6.
Columbia Spatial Information Design Lab. 2006. Million dollar blocks: Justice and the city. New York, NY: Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation. Available from http://www.spatialinformationdesignlab.org/MEDIA/PDF_04.pdf.
7.
DittonPaula M.1999. Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers (NCJ 174463). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
8.
FaganJeffreyWestValerieHollandJan. 2003. Reciprocal effects of crime and incarceration in New York neighborhoods. Fordham Urban Law Journal30:1551–1602.
9.
GarlandDavid W., ed. 2001. Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
GellerAmandaCurtisMarah A.2011. A sort of homecoming: Incarceration and the housing security of urban men. Social Science Research40:1196–1213.
11.
GlazeLauren E.BonczarThomas F.2011. Probation and parole in the United States, 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
HelfgottJacqueline. 1997. Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Probation8:12–24.
14.
HippJohn R.PetersiliaJoanTurnerSusan. 2010. Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology48 (4): 947–79.
15.
HippJohn R.YatesDaniel K.2009. Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology47 (3): 619–56.
16.
HolzerHarry J.1996. What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
HolzerHarry J.OffnerPaulSorensenElaine. 2005. What explains the continuing decline in labor force activity among young black men?Labor History46:37–55.
18.
HughesTimothy A.WilsonDoris JamesBeckAllen J.2001. Trends in state parole, 1990–2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ 184735). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
19.
KirkDavid S.2009. A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. American Sociological Review74:484–505.
20.
KubrinCharis E.StewartEric A.2006. Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology44 (1): 165–97.
21.
La VigneNancyParthasarathyBarbara. 2005. Prisoner reentry and residential mobility. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.
22.
LynchJames P.SabolWilliam J.2004. Effects of incarceration on informal social control. In Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration, eds. PattilloMaryWeimanDavidWesternBruce. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
MauerMarc. 1999. Race to incarcerate. New York, NY: New Press.
24.
MearsDaniel P.WangXiaHayCarterBalesWilliam D.2008. Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology46 (2): 301–40.
25.
MetrauxStephenCulhaneDennis P.2004. Homeless shelter use and reincarceration following release. Criminology and Public Policy3:139–60.
26.
MetrauxStephenRomanCaterina G.ChoRichard S.2007. Incarceration and homelessness. In National symposium on homelessness research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
27.
National Research Council. 2007. Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
28.
PagerDevah. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology108 (5): 937–75.
29.
PetersiliaJoan. 2003. When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
Pew Center on the States. 2009. One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
31.
RomanCaterina G.TravisJeremy. 2006. Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate17:389–418.
32.
SampsonRobert J.LoefflerCharles. 2010. Punishment’s place: The local concentration of mass incarceration. Daedalus139 (3): 20–31.
33.
SchnittkerJasonJohnAndrea. 2007. Enduring stigma: The long-term effects of incarceration on health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior48 (2): 115–30.
34.
SolomonAmy L.ThomsonGillian L.2004. Prisoner reentry in Michigan. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.
TaxmanFaye S.YoungDouglas W.WiersemaBrianRhodesAnneMitchellSuzanne. 2007. The national criminal justice treatment practices survey: Multilevel survey methods and procedures. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment32 (3): 225–38.
37.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1996. “One strike and you’re out”: Screening and eviction policies for public housing authorities (HAs). PIH 96-16(HA). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
38.
VisherChristy A.TravisJeremy. 2003. Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology29:89–113.
39.
WacquantLoïc. 2001. Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society3:95–134.
40.
WesternBruce. 2006. Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
