This article considers whites’ entry into black neighborhoods. The historical review in the first part of the article shows such entry to have been exceedingly rare during the twentieth century. Our analysis of trends in white entry into black neighborhoods for the period 1980–2010 documents a substantial increase in white entry for the 2000–10 decade. We speculate that the increase in white entry into black neighborhoods was due to declining racism among whites and dramatically declining crime rates in the 1990s. We also use multivariate regression to explain which black neighborhoods were most likely to experience an influx of whites. Factors associated with gentrification appear to offer the most promising explanations. We discuss the implications of these findings in the conclusion.
BoboLawrenceSchumanHowardSteehCharlotte. 1986. Changing racial attitudes toward residential integration. In Housing desegregation and federal policy, ed. GoeringJohn M., 152–69. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
2.
BoboLawrenceZubrinskyCamille L.1996. Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice?Social Forces74 (3): 883–909.
3.
BonastiaChris. 2000. Why did affirmative action in housing fail during the Nixon era?Social Problems47 (4): 523–42.
4.
BriggsXavier de SouzaDardenJoe T.AidalaAngela. 1999. In the wake of desegregation: Early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of the American Planning Association65 (1): 27–49.
5.
ChaskinRobert J.JosephMark L.2015. Contested space: Design principles and regulatory regimes in mixed-income communities replacing public housing complexes in Chicago. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
6.
Chicago Commission on Race Relations. 1922. The Negro in Chicago: A study of race relations and a race riot. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CourteauSarah L. 2011. New to the neighborhood. Wilson Quarterly35 (2): 51–56.
8.
CutlerDavid M.GlaeserEdward L.VigdorJacob L.1999. The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy107 (3): 455–507.
9.
DemarcoDonald L.GalsterGeorge C.1993. Prointegrative policy: Theory and practice. Journal of Urban Affairs15 (2): 141–60.
10.
DuncanOtis DudleyDuncanBeverly. 1957. The Negro population of Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EllenIngrid Gould. 2000. Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
FarleyReynoldsSteehCharlotteJacksonTaraKrysanMariaReevesKeith. 1993. Continued residential segregation in Detroit: Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs revisited. Journal of Housing Research4:1–38.
13.
FarrellChad R.LeeBarrett A.2011. Racial diversity and change in metropolitan neighborhoods. Social Science Research40 (4): 1108–23.
14.
FreemanLance. 2006. There goes the ’hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
FreyWilliam H.FarleyReynolds. 1996. Latino, Asian, and black segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Are multiethnic metros different?Demography33 (1): 35–50.
16.
FriedsonMichaelSharkeyPatrick. 2015. Violence and neighborhood disadvantage after the crime decline. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
17.
GreenbergStanley. 1996. Middle class dreams: The politics and power of the new American majority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
GregorAlison. 13July2014. Bedford-Stuyvesant: Diverse and changing. New York Times.
19.
HolinMary JoelBurinLarryLockeGretchenCortesAlvaro. 2003. Interim assessment of the HOPE VI program cross-site report. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
20.
ImmergluckDan. 2009. Foreclosed: High-risk lending, deregulation, and the undermining of America’s mortgage market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
KneeboneElizabethNadeauCareyBerubeAlan. 2011. The re-emergence of concentrated poverty: Metropolitan trends in the 2000s. Metropolitan Opportunity Series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
KrysanMariaCouperMick P.FarleyReynoldsFormanTyrone A.2009. Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology115 (2): 527–59.
23.
LeeBarrett A.1985. Racially mixed neighborhoods during the 1970s: Change or stability?Social Science Quarterly66:346–64.
24.
LeeBarrett A.SpainDaphneUmbersonDebra J.1985. Neighborhood revitalization and racial change: The case of Washington, DC. Demography22 (4): 581–602.
25.
LeeBarrett A.WoodPeter B.1991. Is neighborhood racial succession place-specific?Demography28 (1): 21–40.
26.
LevensonFrancesFisherMargaret. 1962. The struggle for open housing. The Progressive26 (12): 25–30.
27.
LeyDavid. 1996. The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
LoganJohn R.AlbaRichard D.1993. Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography30 (2): 243–68.
29.
LoganJohn R.XuZengwangStultsBrian. 2012. Interpolating U.S. decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. Professional Geographer66 (3): 412–20.
30.
LoganJohn R.ZhangCharles. 2010. Global neighborhoods: New pathways to diversity and separation. American Journal of Sociology115 (4): 1069–109.
31.
MasseyDouglas S.CondranGretchen A.DentonNancy A.1987. The effect of residential segregation on black social and economic well-being. Social Forces66 (1): 29–56.
32.
MasseyDouglas S.MullanBrendan P.1984. Processes of black and Hispanic spatial assimilation. American Journal of Sociology89 (4): 836–73.
33.
MuhammadKhalil Gibran. 2010. The condemnation of blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
MusterdSako. 2005. Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: Levels, causes, and effects. Journal of Urban Affairs27 (3): 331–48.
35.
PolikoffAlex. 2005. A vision for the future: Bringing Gautreaux to scale. In Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, eds. TegelerPhilipCunninghamMaryTurnerMargery Austin, 137–50. Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
36.
President’s Conference on Home Building and Home Ownership. 1931. Negro housing: Report of the committee on Negro housing. Washington, DC: President’s Conference on Home Building and Home Ownership.
37.
RiisJacob A.1890/1971. How the other half lives. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
38.
RobertsSam. 5August2011. Striking change in Bedford-Stuyvesant as the white population soars. New York Times.
39.
SaltmanJuliet. 1990. A fragile movement: The struggle for neighborhood stabilization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
SmithTom W.HoutMichaelMarsdenPeter V.2013. General social survey, 1972–2012 [Cumulative file]. University of Connecticut/University of Michigan Ann Arbor Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. Storrs, CT: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
41.
SpainDaphneLaskaShirley, eds. 1980. Back to the city: Issues in neighborhood revitalization. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1982. 1982 Census of retail trade: Major retail centers in standard metropolitan statistical areas. Washington, DC: U.S. Commerce Department.
44.
WeaverRobert C.1948. The Negro ghetto. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
45.
WoodPeter B.LeeBarrett A.1991. Is neighborhood racial succession inevitable? Forty years of evidence. Urban Affairs Review26:610–23.
46.
ZimringFranklin E.2007. The great American crime decline. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
