If international criminal courts are to achieve their aims—one of which is to contribute to the consolidation of democracy and the triumph of the rule of law over the instinct for revenge after prolonged periods of communal violence—perception of their legitimacy by the local population is a crucial factor. After laying out and comparing the basic features of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Special Court for Sierra Leone as to their respective origins, objectives, and programs of outreach, the article examines local reception from three standpoints: perceptions of overall legitimacy, perceptions of tribunal impartiality, and the effect of public perceptions of the tribunals on the respective countries' reconciliation process.
Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone on the Establishment of the Special Court for Sierra Leone. 2002. January 16.
2.
Akhavan, Payam. 2001. Beyond impunity: Can international criminal justice prevent future atrocities?American Journal of International Law95:7-31.
3.
Alic, Anes. 2004. Demand for arrests. June 7. Transitions Online. Retrieved January 9, 2005, from WL (Westlaw) 62509513.
4.
Bandovic, Igor. 2004. Remarks of Igor Bandovic. In International war crimes trials: Making a difference?ed. Steven R. Ratner and James L. Bischoff. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
Bangura, Zainab. 2005. Sierra Leone: Ordinary Courts and the Special Court. February. http://www.justiceinitiative.org/db/resource2/fs/?file_id=15283 (accessed December 10, 2004).
6.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1974. International extradition and world public order. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.
7.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1980. A draft international criminal code and draft statute for an international criminal tribunal. Boston: M. Nijhoff.
8.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1986a. International criminal law. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.
9.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1986b. International crimes: Digest/index of international instruments, 1815-1985.New York: Oceana.
10.
Coalition for the ICC. 2005. World signature and ratifications. http://www.iccnow.org/countryinfo/worldsigsandratifications.html (accessed June 19, 2005).
11.
Coombs, Nancy Amoury. 2002. Copping a plea to genocide: The plea bargaining of international crimes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review151:1-157.
12.
Devic, Ana. 2003. War guilt and responsibility: The case of Serbia. March. Social Science Research Council. Available on Columbia International Affairs Online.
13.
Drumbl, Mark. 2004. Remarks of Mark Drumbl. In International war crimes trials: Making a difference?ed. Steven R. Ratner and James L. Bischoff. Austin: University of Texas Press.
14.
Gberie, Lansana. 2003. Briefing: The Special Court of Sierra Leone. African Affairs102:637-648.
15.
Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2004. Bringing justice: The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Accomplishments, shortcomings, and needed support. September. http://hrw.org/reports/2004/sierraleone0904/(accessed May 6, 2005).
16.
ICTY President to UN Security Council. 2005. June 13. http://www.cij.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewReport&reportID=690&tribunalID=1 (accessed June 22, 2005).
17.
International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ). 2004. The Special Court for Sierra Leone: The first eighteen months. http://www.ictj.org/downloads/SC_SL_Case_Study_designed.pdf (accessed June 21, 2005).
18.
International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic. 2004. The Hague Tribunal—Conclusions from the Seminar held on 19 June 2004 at the Faculty of Laws, Belgrade. http://www.icdsm.org/more/BF1906.htm (accessed June 23, 2005).
19.
International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY). n.d.-a. Bringing justice to the former Yugoslavia: The tribunal's five core achievements. http://www.un.org/icty/cases/factsheets/achieve-e.htm (accessed December 10, 2004).
20.
International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY). n.d.-b. General information. http://www.un.org/icty/cases/factsheets/generalinfo-e.htm (accessed December 10, 2004).
21.
International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY). n.d.-c. Key figures of ICTY cases. http://www.un.org/icty/cases/factsheets/procfact-e.htm (accessed January 17, 2005).
22.
International Crisis Group. 2003. The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Promises and pitfalls of a “new model.”http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?action=login&ref_id=1803 (accessed January 9, 2005).
23.
Kamanda, Joseph. 2003. Is the Special Court truly independent and neutral?Concord Times (Sierra Leone), December 11. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from Global News Wire—Asia, Africa.
24.
Kendall, Sara, and Michelle Staggs. 2005. From mandate to legacy: The Special Court for Sierra Leone as a model for “hybrid justice.” April. U.C. Berkeley War Crimes Study Center. http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/warcrime/SLSC_Report.pdf (accessed May 11, 2005).
25.
Kerr, Rachel. 2004. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: An exercise in law, politics and diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
McDonald, Gabrielle Kirk. 2004. Assessing the impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. In International war crimes trials: Making a difference?ed. Steven R. Ratner and James L. Bischoff. Austin: University of Texas Press.
27.
Mladjenovic, Lepa. 2004. The ICTY: The validation of the experiences of survivors. In International war crimes trials: Making a difference?ed. Steven R. Ratner and James L. Bischoff. Austin: University of Texas Press.
28.
A more secure world: Our shared responsibility, Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. 2004. New York: United Nations.
29.
On this day 2000: Milosevic quits, street celebrations continue. 2000. October 6. Retrieved http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/october/6/newsid_2516000/2516673.stm (accessed June 23, 2005).
30.
Perceptions in Serbia. 2001. USIP Peace Watch7 (June): 6-6.
31.
Post-conflict Reintegration Initiative for Development and Empowerment (PRIDE). 2002. Ex-combatant views of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court in Sierra Leone. September 12. http://www.ictj.org/downloads/PRIDE%20report.pdf (accessed June 22, 2005).
32.
President of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). 2004. First annual report for the period 2 December 2002–1 December 2003. http://www.sc-sl.org/specialcourtannualreport2002-2003.pdf (accessed June 20, 2005).
33.
Prosecutors of the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. 2004. Joint Statement. November 27. http://www.sc-sl.org/prosecutor-092004.pdf (accessed June 22, 2005).
34.
Rehrl, Annette. 2004. Sierra Leone: We want reconciliation. We will never forget. But we try to forgive. Refugees Magazine136 (September): 15-18.
35.
Romano, Cesare P. R., Andre Nollkaemper, and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. 2004. Internationalized criminal courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Shaw, Rosalind. 2005. Rethinking Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: Lessons from Sierra Leone. Special Report no. 130. February. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.
37.
Simons, Marlise. 2003. Plea deals being used to clear Balkan war tribunal' docket. New York Times, November 18.
38.
Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). 2002. Statute of the Special Court. January 16.
39.
Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL). n.d. About the Special Court. http://www.sc-sl.org/about.html (accessed January 10, 2005).
40.
Special Court for Sierra Leone, Appeals Chamber. 2004a. Prosecutor v. Charles Ghankay Taylor. Decision on immunity from prosecution. May 31. http://www.sc-sl.org/Documents/SCSL-03-01-I-059.pdf (accessed December 10, 2004).
41.
Special Court for Sierra Leone, Appeals Chamber. 2004b. Prosecutor v. Sam Hinga Norman. Decision on preliminary motion based on lack of jurisdiction (child recruitment). May 31. http://www.sc-sl.org/Documents/SCSL-04-14-AR72(E)-131-7383.pdf; and http://www.sc-sl.org/Documents/SCSL-04-14-AR72(E)-131-7398.pdf (accessed June 20, 2005).
42.
Standard Times. 2003. Sierra Leone: President Charles Taylor's escape. Africa News, June 16.
43.
United Nations Security Council. 1993. Resolution 808 [establishment of ICTY]. U.N. Doc. S/RES/808. February 22. New York: United Nations Security Council.
44.
United Nations Security Council. 2000. Resolution 1315 [establishment of SCSL]. U.N. Doc. S/RES/1315. August 14. New York: United Nations Security Council.
45.
United Nations Security Council. 2003. Resolution 1503 [ICTY completion strategy]. U.N. Doc. S/RES/1503. August 28. New York: United Nations Security Council.
