The development of fair and impartial criteria for judging those accused of international crimes is one of the most critical issues facing the international community and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Are the resources, experience, and moral force so weighted in favor of the international community that the accused cannot obtain a fair contest? Are international criminal trials legalistic exercises that cloak a victor's justice, or do such courts premise their decisions on fair criteria? Data on ICTY verdicts and punishment of convicted war criminals show that the ICTY judges follow a "legal" model and that punishment is based primarily on the gravity of the crimes committed and the defendant's level of responsibility in the political and military chain of command. Political factors largely do not explain verdicts or sentences.
Akhavan, Payam . 1998. Justice in The Hague, peace in the former Yugoslavia? A commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal. Human Rights Quarterly4:737-816.
2.
---. 2001. Beyond impunity: Can international criminal justice prevent future atrocities?American Journal of International Law95 (January): 7-31.
3.
Albonetti, Celesta A.1997. Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review31:789-822.
4.
Bass, Gary Jonathan . 2000. Stay the hand of vengeance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif . 1996. Searching for peace and achieving justice: The need for accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems59 (autumn): 13-18.
6.
---. 1999. Crimes against humanity in international criminal law. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
7.
Beigbeder, Yves . 1999. Judging war criminals. New York: St. Martin's.
8.
Berk, Richard A.1983. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review48:386-98.
9.
Brace, Paul , and Melinda Gann Hall. 1993. Integrated models of judicial dissent. Journal of Politics55:54-70.
10.
---. 1997. The interplay of preferences, case facts, context and rules in the politics of judicial choice. Journal of Politics59:1206-31.
11.
Creta, Vincent M.1998. Comment: The search for justice in the former Yugoslavia and beyond. Houston Journal of International Law30:381-418.
12.
Danner, Allison Marston . 2001. Constructing a hierarchy of crimes in international criminal law sentencing. Virginia Law Review87 (May): 415-501.
13.
Dixon, Jo.1995. The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology100:1157-98.
14.
Emmert, Craig . 1992. An integrated case-related model of judicial decision making: Explaining Supreme Court decisions in judicial review cases. Journal of Politics54:543-52.
15.
Engen, Rodney L. , and Sara Steen. 2000. The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. American Journal of Sociology105:1357-95.
16.
Fair trials and the role of international criminal defense . 2001. Harvard Law Review114:1982-2006.
17.
Galanter, Marc . 1974. Why the "haves" come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review9:95-160.
18.
George, Tracy E. , and Lee Epstein. 1992. On the nature of Supreme Court decision making. American Political Science Review86:323-37.
19.
Gibson, James L.1978. Judges' role orientation, attitudes and decisions: An interactive model. American Political Science Review72:911-24.
20.
Goldstein, Judith , Miles Kahler, Robert Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. Introduction: Legalization and world politics. International Organization54:385-99.
21.
Goldstone, Richard J.2000. For humanity: Reflections of a war crimes investigator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Gorton, Joe , and John Boies. 1999. Sentencing guidelines and racial disparity across time. Social Science Quarterly80:37-54.
23.
Hayden, Robert M.1999. Biased "justice": Humanrightsism and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Cleveland State Law Review47:549-73.
24.
Holbrooke, Richard . 1998. To end a war. New York: Random House.
25.
Jacob, Herbert , and James Eisenstein. 1975. Sentences and other sanctions in the criminal courts of Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit. Political Science Quarterly90:617-35.
26.
Jaros, Dean , and Robert I. Mendelsohn. 1967. The judicial role and sentencing behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science11:471-88.
27.
Johnson, Scott T.1998. On the road to disaster: The rights of the accused and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. International Legal Perspectives10:111-92.
28.
Joinet, Louis . 1996. The administration of justice and the human rights of detainees. Law and Contemporary Problems59 (autumn): 271-72.
29.
Jokic, Alexsander . 2001. War crimes and collective wrongdoing. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
30.
Kennan, George F.19851986. Morality and foreign policy. Foreign Affairs64:205-18.
31.
Kingsnorth, Rodney , John Lopez, Jennifer Wentworth, and Debra Cummings. 1998. Adult sexual assault: The role of racialethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice26:359-71.
32.
Kissinger, Henry . 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33.
Kritzer, Herbert M.1978. Political correlates of the behavior of federal district judges: A best case analysis. Journal of Politics40:25-58.
34.
Legalization and world politics (special issue). 2000. International Organization54 (3).
35.
McGuire, Kevin T.1998. Explaining executive success in the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly51:505-26.
36.
Mears, Daniel . 1998. The sociology of sentencing: Reconceptualizing decisionmaking processes and outcomes. Law and Society Review32:667-724.
37.
Mearsheimer, John . 19941995. The false promise of international institutions. International Security19 (winter): 5-49.
38.
Meernik, James , and Kimi King. 2002. The effectiveness of international law and the ICTY-Preliminary results of an empirical study. International Criminal Law Review1:343-72.
39.
Morgenthau, Hans J . 1982. In defense of the national interest. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
40.
---. 1984. Human rights and foreign policy. In Moral dimensions of American foreign policy, edited by in Kenneth W. Thompson. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
41.
Pindyck, Robert S. , and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1998. Economic models and economic forecasts. 4th ed.Boston: IrwinMcGraw-Hill.
42.
Pratt, Travis. C.1998. Race and sentencing: A meta-analysis of conflicting empirical research results. Journal of Criminal Justice26:513-23.
43.
Pruitt, Charles R. , and James Q. Wilson. 1983. A longitudinal study of the effect of race on sentencing. Law and Society Review17:613-35.
44.
Ratner, Steven R. , and Jason S. Abrams. 2001. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Robertson, Geoffrey . 2000. Crimes against humanity. New York: New Press.
46.
Schabas, William A.1997. Sentencing by international tribunals: A human rights approach. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law7:461-517.
47.
Scharf, Michael P.1997. Balkan justice: The story behind the first international war crimes trial since Nuremberg. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
48.
Segal, Jeffrey , and Harold Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Sheehan, Reginald S. , William Mishler, and Donald Songer. 1992. Ideology, status, and the differential success of direct parties before the Supreme Court. American Political Science Review86:464-71.
50.
Simmons, Beth . 2000. International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review94:819-35.
51.
Songer, Donald R. , and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1992. Who wins on appeal? Upperdogs and underdogs in the United States courts of appeals. American Journal of Political Science36:235-58.
52.
Thucydides . 1996. History of the Peloponnesian War. Edited by Robert Strassler. New York: Free Press.
53.
Waltz, Kenneth . 1979. Theory of international relations. New York: Random House.
54.
Wanner, Craig . 1975. The public ordering of private relations: Part I: Initiating civil cases in urban trial courts. Law and Society Review8:421.
55.
Wheeler, Stanton , Bliss Cartwright, Robert Kagan, and Lawrence Friedman. 1987. Do the "haves" come out ahead? Winning and losing in state supreme courts, 1870-1970. Law and Society Review21:403-45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
