Research consistently shows that the share of females in an occupation is negatively associated with wages, and this has frequently been interpreted as an expression of devaluation of women’s work. However, few studies have described the detailed shape of the relationship between wages and occupational sex composition. Using Swedish register data from 2001 and 2003, I advance our understanding of the devaluation process by studying the functional form more closely in both the cross-section and panel. The analyses reveal a non-linear relationship between sex composition and wages, where the highest wages for both men and women are earned in sex-integrated occupations. Second, studying the wage payoffs of people moving across occupations with varying sex compositions shows that both sexes gain by moving to relatively sex-integrated occupations (about 25 to 54% female).
BudigM (2002) Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator?Social Problems49(2): 258–277.
2.
CameronACTrivediPK (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata. Texas: Stata Press Publication.
3.
CatanzariteL (2003) Race–gender composition and occupational pay degradation. Social Problems50(1): 14–37.
4.
CotterDHermsenJVannemanR (2004) Gender Inequality at Work. A volume in the series, the American people: Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Population Reference Bureau.
5.
De RuijterJvan Doorne-HuiskesASchippersJ (2003) Size and causes of the occupational gender wage-gap in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review19(4): 345–360.
6.
EnglandP (1992) Comparable Worth. Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
7.
EnglandP (2005) Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology31: 381–399.
8.
EnglandPFarkasGKilbourneBDouT (1988) Explaining occupational sex segregation and wages: Findings from a model with fixed effects. American Sociological Review53(4): 544–559.
9.
EnglandPHermsenJCotterD (2000) The devaluation of women’s work: A comment on Tam. American Journal of Sociology105(6): 1741–1751.
10.
EnglandPAllisonPWuX (2007) Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, does feminization reduce pay, and how can we tell with longitudinal data?Social Science Research36(3): 1237–1256.
11.
FeldmanDNgT (2007) Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. Journal of Management33(3): 350–377.
12.
GerhartBEl CheikhN (1991) Earnings and percentage female: A longitudinal study. Industrial Relations30(1): 62–78.
13.
HakimC (1998) Social Change and Innovation in the Labour Market. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
JohnsonD (2005) Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family67(4): 1061–1075.
15.
JurajudaSHermgartH (2004) When are ‘female’ occupations paying more?IZA Discussion Paper No. 985.
16.
KarlinCAEnglandPRichardsonM (2002) Why do ‘women’s jobs’ have low pay for their educational level. Gender Issues20(4): 1–22.
17.
KilbourneBEnglandPFarkasGBeronKWeirD (1994a) Returns to skills, compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white women and men. American Journal of Sociology100(3): 689–719.
18.
KilbourneBEnglandPBeronK (1994b) Effects of individual, occupational, and industrial characteristics on earnings: Intersections of race and gender. Social Forces72(4): 1149–1176.
19.
Le GrandC (1997) Kön, lön och yrke – yrkessegregering och lönediskriminering mot kvinnor i Sverige. In: PerssonIWadensjöE (eds) Kvinnors och mäns löner – varför så olika?SOU 1997: 136. Stockholm: Fritzes, 45–88.
20.
LevanonAEnglandPAllisonP (2009) Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. census data. Social Forces88(2): 865–891.
21.
MacphersonDHirschB (1995) Wages and gender composition: Why do women’s jobs pay less?Journal of Labor Economic13(3): 426–471.
22.
MagnussonC (2004) Vilken betydelse har yrkets könssammansättning på lönen på individnivå?Manuscript. Swedish Institute for Social Research SOFI.
23.
MagnussonC (2009) Gender, occupational prestige and wages: A test of devaluation theory. European Sociological Review25(1): 87–101.
24.
MagnussonC (2010) Mind the Gap. Essays on Explanations of Gender Wage Inequality. Swedish Institute for Social Research Dissertation Series No. 78.
25.
PfefferJDavis-BlakeA (1987) The effect of the proportion of women on salaries. The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly32(1): 1–24.
26.
ReidL (1998) Devaluing women and minorities. The effect of race/ethnic and sex composition of occupations on wage level. Work and Occupations25(4): 511–536.
27.
ReskinBRoosP (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
ReskinBBielbyD (2005) A sociological perspective on gender and career outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(1): 71–86.
29.
RoseDHarrisonE (2007) The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies9(3): 459–490.
30.
RosenfeldR (1992) Job mobility and career processes. Annual Review of Sociology18: 39–61.
31.
ShaumanK (2006) Occupational sex segregation and the earnings of occupations: What causes the link among college-educated workers?Social Science Research35(3): 577–619.
32.
SnyderDHudisP (1976) Occupational income and the effects on minority competition and segregation: A reanalysis and some new evidence. American Sociological Review41(2): 209–234.
33.
SørensenA (1975) The structure of intragenerational mobility. American Sociological Review40 (August): 456–471.
34.
Statistics Sweden (2006) Lönestrukturstatistiken 1970–2003.
35.
SteinbergR (1990) Social construction of skill. Gender, power and comparable worth. Work and Occupations17(4): 449–482.
36.
TamT (1997) Sex segregation and occupational gender inequality in United States: Devaluation or specialized training. American Journal of Sociology102(6): 1652–1692.
37.
TamT (2000) Occupational wage inequality and devaluation: A cautionary tale of measurement error. American Journal of Sociology105(6): 1752–1760.
38.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD (1993) The gender and race composition of jobs and the male/female, white/black pay gaps. Social Forces72(1): 45–76.
39.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDSkaggsS (2002) Sex segregation, labor process organization and gender earnings inequality. American Journal of Sociology108(1): 102–128.
40.
WrightRJacobsJ (1994) Male flight from computer-work – a new look at occupational resegregation and ghettoization. American Sociological Review59(4): 511–536.
