Using a sociological theory of rational argumentation as its point of departure, this article discusses the ‘best interests of the child’ as a guiding principle when decisions are made. Application of this principle has been criticized for weakening the legal protection of children and parents and resulting in arbitrary and subjective decisions. The criteria for rational decision-making are outlined and three cases of enforced adoption are analysed in an effort to understand how the Norwegian highest appellate court comes to a decision in the best interests of the child. The findings show that two of the three decisions do not meet the standards of rational argumentation, suggesting that decisions are instead based on the judges’ subjective preferences. This finding is problematic from a democratic point of view and indicates that decisions and interventions are neither rational nor legitimate.
Alexy, R. ( 1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
2.
Alston, P. (ed.) (1994) The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
Archard, D. and Skivenes, M.(2009) ‘Balancing a Child’s Best Interest and a Child’s Views’, International Journal of Children’s Rights17: 1-21.
4.
Archard, D. and Skivenes, M. (forthcoming) ‘Deciding Best Interests’, Journal of Children’s Services.
5.
Artis, J. ( 2004) ‘Judging the Best Interests of the Child: Judges’ Accounts of the Tender Years Doctrine’, Law & Society Review38: 769-806.
6.
Bartholet, E. ( 1999) Nobody’s Children: Abuse and Neglect, Fosterdrift, and the Adoption Alternative. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
7.
Breen, C. ( 2002) The Standard of the Best Interest of the Child . The Hague, London and New York: Martinus Nijhoff.
8.
Burman, S. ( 2003) ‘The Best Interests of the South African Child’, International Journal of Law, Policy and Family17: 28-40.
9.
Child Welfare Act (Norway) (1992) English translation. Available at: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/doc/Laws/Acts/The-Child-Welfare-Act.html?id=448398
10.
Children Act (England) (1989) Available at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1989/Ukpga_19890041_en_1.htm
11.
Christoffersen, M.N., Hammen, I., Andersen, K.R. and Jeldtoft, N. ( 2007) A Meta-Analysis of How Adoption Functions. Adoption as a Child Protection Measure (Adoption som indsats - En systematisk gennemgang af utenlandske erfaringer). SFI rapport nr. 32. København : Det nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd (in Danish).
12.
Dunn, M., Clare, I., Holland, A. and Gunn, M. ( 2007) ‘Constructing and Reconstructing ‘‘Best Interests’’: An Interpretative Examination of Substitute Decision-making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law29: 117-33.
13.
Eckhoff, T. ( 1993) Sources for Interpreting Law (‘Rettskildelære’) . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget (1st edn 1971) (in Norwegian).
14.
Eekelaar, J. ( 1994) ‘The Interest of the Child and the Child’s Wishes: The Role of Dynamic Self-Determinism’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family8: 42-61.
15.
Elster, J. ( 1989) Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Eriksen, E.O. and Skivenes, M. ( 1998) ‘How to Make Valid Decisions in Child Protection Cases’ (‘Om å fatte riktige beslutninger i barnevernet’) , Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning3: 352-80 (in Norwegian).
17.
Felitti, V.J., Williamson, D.F., Koss, M.P., Spitz, A.M., Anda, R.F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998) ‘Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine14: 245-58.
18.
Freeman, M. ( 2007) Article 3: The Best Interests of the Child. Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
19.
Gilbert, N. (ed.) (1997) Combating Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Gilbert, N., Parton, N. and Skivenes, M. (eds) (forthcoming) Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Emerging Orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A. and Solnit, A.J. ( 1973) Beyond the Best Interests of the Child. New York: Free Press.
22.
Grinde, T.V. ( 2005) ‘Adoption Practice in Norway’, paper presented at the ‘Childhood Conference’ in Oslo.
23.
Habermas, J. ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Hall, A.S., Pulver, C.A. and Cooley, M.J. ( 1996) ‘Psychology of Best Interest Standard: Fifty State Statutes and their Theoretical Antecedents’, American Journal of Family Therapy24: 171-80.
25.
Hetherington, R. ( 1997) Protecting Children: Messages from Europe. Lyme Regis: Russel House.
26.
Hollinger, J. ( 2002) Adoption Law and Practice. Newark, NJ and San Francisco, CA: LexisNexis .
27.
Innst. O. No. 80 (1991-92) Parliament committee report on the Child Welfare Act of 1992. (Innstilling fra Forbruker- og administrasjonskomiteen om lov om barneverntjenester) (in Norwegian).
28.
Lowe, N. and Douglas, G. ( 2007) Bromley’s Family Law, 10th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Magnussen, A.-M. ( 2006) Judicial Precedence - An Institutional Analysis of How Courts Make Law (Domstolskapt rett. En institusjonell analyse av utviklingen av regelen om ulovfestet objektivt ansvar fra 1866 til 2003). PhD monograph. Bergen: University of Bergen, Department of Administration & Organization Science (in Norwegian).
30.
Mnookin, R.H. ( 1973) ‘Foster Care: In Who’s Best Interest?’ , Harvard Education Review43: 599-638.
31.
Mnookin, R.H. and Szwed, E. ( 1983) ‘The Best Interest Syndrome as the Allocation of Power in Child Care’, in H. Geach and E. Szwed (eds) Providing Civil Justice for the Child, pp. 7-20. London: Edward Arnold.
32.
NOU1985: 18 ‘Law Panel Paper on an Act of Social Services and More’ (in Norwegian).
33.
Ot. Prp. No 44 (1991-1992) ‘White Paper about the Government’s Suggestion for the Child Welfare Act of 1992’ (in Norwegian).
34.
Ottosen, M. ( 2006) ‘In the Name of The Father, The Child and The Holy Genes. Constructions of ‘‘The Child’s Best Interest’’ in Legal Disputes Over Contact’, Acta Sociologica49: 29-46.
35.
Parker, S. ( 1994) ‘The Best Interest of the Child - Principles and Problems’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family8: 26-41.
36.
Peters, J.K. ( 2007) Representing Children in Child Protective Proceedings. Ethical and Practical Dimensions. Newark, NJ and San Francisco, CA: LexisNexis.
37.
Piper, C. ( 2000) ‘Assumptions about Children’s Best Interests’ , Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law22: 261-76.
38.
Rt-1997-534 (150-97) Norwegian Supreme Court Decision about Adoption of Children from Foster Care. Available at: www.lovdata.no (in Norwegian).
39.
Rt-2001-14 (7-2001) Norwegian Supreme Court Decision about Adoption of Children from Foster Care. Available at: www.lovdata.no (in Norwegian).
40.
Rt-2007-00732-A Norwegian Supreme Court Decision about Adoption of Children from Foster Care . Available at: www.lovdata.no (in Norwegian).
41.
Schiratzki, J. ( 2000) ‘The Best Interests of the Child in the Swedish Aliens Act’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family14: 206-25.
42.
Skivenes, M. ( 2002) Legislation and Legitimacy - an Evaluation of the Law Making Process of the Child Welfare Act of 1992 (Lovgivning og legitimitet - En evaluering av lov om barneverntjenester av 1992 i et deliberativt perspektiv) . Bergen: UiB, Institutt for administrasjon og organisasjonsvitenskap, Rapport nr. 79. PhD thesis (in Norwegian).
43.
Skivenes, M. ( 2009) ‘Post-Adoption Contact in Child Welfare Cases - in the Child’s Best Interests?’ (‘Kontakt med biologisk familie etter adopsjon i barnevernet - til barnets beste?’), Tidsskrift for familierett, arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmål3: 134-55 (in Norwegian).
44.
Tobin, J. and McNair, R.(2009) ‘Public International Law and the Regulation of Private Spaces: Does the Convention on the Rights of the Child Impose an Obligation on States to Allow Gay and Lesbian Couples to Adopt?’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family23: 110-31.
45.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Available at: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htm
46.
Weyland, I. ( 1997) ‘The Blood Tie: Raised to the Status of a Presumption’ , Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law19: 173-88.
