Collaboration is an important part of scientific practice and work. This analysis of how field experimental collaborations within atmospheric science are organized focuses on how relations between researchers are established and how this is related to the mobilization of resources. It is argued that these relationships can be understood by being considered from the point of view of the different researcher roles that researchers play in relation to each other. The article outlines three different roles: the entrepreneur, the integrated experimentalist and the instrument expert. These roles differ in terms of their position in the organization of projects and in the role measurement instruments play for researchers in their work as well as in relation to other roles. The article also discusses how the different roles of measurement instruments affect how and when researchers become involved in collaborative projects.
Atkinson, P. , Bachelor, C. and Parsons, E. (1998) ` Trajectories of Collaboration and Competition in Medical Discovery ', Science, Technology, and Human Values23: 259—84.
2.
Becker, H.S. (1974) ` Art as Collective Action ', American Sociological Review39: 767—76.
3.
Becker, H.S. (1978) ` Arts and Crafts ', American Journal of Sociology83: 862—89.
4.
Becker, H.S. (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press .
5.
Becker, H.S. (1998) Tricks of the Trade. How to Think about Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
6.
Boyatzis, R.E. (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks , London and New Delhi: SAGE.
7.
Callon, M. (1986) `Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay', in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
Callon, M. (1987) `Society in the Making. The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis', in W. E. Bijker , T. Hughes and T. J. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Callon, M. and Law, J. (1982) ` On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrollment and Counter Enrollment ', Social Studies of Science12: 615—25.
10.
Callon, M. , Law, J. and Rip, A. ( 1986) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan.
11.
Cambrosio, A. , Keating, P. and Mogutov, A. (2004) ` Mapping Collaborative Work and Innovation in Biomedicine ', Social Studies of Science34: 325—64.
12.
Chomapalov, I. and Shrum, W. (1999) ` Institutional Collaboration in Science: A Typology of Technological Practice ', Science, Technology & Human Values24: 338—72.
13.
Clarke, A. and Fujimura, J. (eds) (1992) The Right Tools for the Job. At Work in 20th Century Life Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Cummings, J.N. and Kiesler, S. (2005) ` Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries ', Social Studies of Science35: 703—22.
15.
Duque, R.B. , Ynalwez, M. , Sooryamoorthy, R. , Mbatia, P. , Dzorgbo, D.-B.S. and Shrum, W. (2005) ` Collaboration Paradox. Scientific Productivity, the Internet, and Problems of Research in Developing Areas ', Social Studies of Science35: 755—85.
16.
Fujimura, J. (1987) ` Constructing “Do-able” Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment ', Social Studies of Science17: 257—93.
17.
Fujimura, J. (1991) `On Methods, Ontologies and Representation in the Sociology of Science: Where Do We Stand?' in D. Maines (ed.) Social Organization and Social Processes: Essays in the Honour of Anselm Strauss. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
18.
Fujimura, J. (1992) `The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research. Where Social Worlds Meet', in A. Strauss and J. Corbin (eds) Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE .
19.
Guimera, R. , Uzzi, B. , Spiro, J. and Nunes Amaral, L.A. (2005) ` Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance ', Science308 (April 29): 697—702.
20.
Hackett, E. (2005) ` Introduction. Special Guest-Edited Issue on Scientific Collaboration ', Social Studies of Science35: 667—71.
21.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001) `Objectual Practice', in T. R. Schatzki , K. Knorr Cetina and E. von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
23.
Kraut, R.E. , Galegher, J. and Egido, C. (1988) ` Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Collaborations ', Human-Computer Interaction3: 31—58.
24.
Laband, D.N. and Tollison, R.D. (2000) ` Intellectual Collaboration ', Journal of Political Economy108: 632—62.
25.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA and London : Harvard University Press.
27.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
28.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979/1986) Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Lee, S. and Bozeman, B. (2005) ` The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity ', Social Studies of Science35: 673—702.
30.
Luukkonen, T. , Persson, O. and Sivertsen, G. (1992) ` Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration ', Science, Technology, and Human Values17: 101—26.
31.
Nutch, F. (1996) ` Gadgets, Gizmos, and Instruments: Science for the Tinkering ', Science, Technology, and Human Values21: 214—28.
32.
Pao, M.L. (1992) ` Global and Local Collaborators: A Study of Scientific Collaboration ', Information Processing and Management28: 99—109.
33.
Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Price, D. J. de Solla (1963) Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
Qin, J. ( 1994) ` An Investigation of Research Collaboration in the Sciences through the Philosophical Transactions 1901—1991 ', Scientometrics29: 219—38.
36.
Rheinberger, H.J. (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Saari, E. (1999) ` Dynamics of Collaboration: The Case of Finnish and American Aerosol Research Groups ', Science Studies12: 21—43.
38.
Schild, I. (1996) The Politics of International Collaboration in Polar Research. PhD Dissertation in Sociology, SPRU, University of Sussex .
39.
Schumpeter, J. (1911/2000) `Entrepreneurship as Innovation ', in R. Swedberg (ed.) ( 2000) Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Star, S.L. (1983) ` Simplification in Scientific Work: An Example from Neuroscience Research ', Social Studies of Science13: 205—28.
41.
Strauss, A. (1987) `The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process', in A. Strauss ( 1991) Creating Sociological Awareness. Collective Images and Symbolic Representations. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.
42.
Sundberg, M. (2005) Making Meteorology: Social Relations and Scientific Practice. PhD Dissertation at the Department of Sociology, Stockholm University .
