Effective and sustainable ecosystem management is becoming a vital societal issue. Increasingly, there is a growing mandate among all sectors of society—public, governmental, business, civic, and environmental—to become collaborative stakeholders in dialogues about the management of ecosystem resources. What has been missing, however, is an explicit analysis of interorganizational networks for sustainable ecosystem management as emerging learning organizations. This article demonstrates the explanatory and diagnostic power of applying the concepts of virtual learning networks to sustainable ecosystem management to guide stakeholders in cocreating a shared conceptual infrastructure for generative learning, consensus building, and collaborative decision making. Related dynamics of collaboration and power and the diffusion of rules and practices are also explored. Next steps are indicated for further development, demonstration, and documentation of the applicability and utility of this model to sustainable ecosystem management.
Agranoff, R. (1996). Managing inter-organizational processes. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 131-147). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Agranoff, R. (2001). After the network is formed: Processes, power, and performance. In M. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 11-29). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
3.
Allee, V. (2002). The future of knowledge: Increasing prosperity through value network. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
4.
Anderson, J.L., Hilborn, R.W., Lackey, R.T., & Ludwig, D. (2003). Watershed restoration—Adaptive decision making in the face of uncertainty. In R. C. Wissmar & P. A. Bisson (Eds.), Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: Sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems (pp. 203-232). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
5.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory-in-action perspective . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley .
7.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London : Sage.
9.
Bovasso, G. (1992). A structural analysis of the formation of a network organization. Group and Organization Management, 17, 86-106.
10.
Christensen, N.L., Bartuska, A.M., Brown, J.H., Carpenter, S., D'Antonio, C., Francis, R., et al. (1996). The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 6, 665-691.
11.
Dewitt, J. (1994). Civic environmentalism. Issues inScience and Technology, 10(4), 30-35.
12.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
13.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley : University of California.
14.
Easterby-Smith, M., Burgoyne, J., & Araujo, L. (Eds.). (1999). Organizational learning and the learning organization . London: Sage.
15.
Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 783-796.
16.
Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. (2003). Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17.
Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning and the learning organization: Diverging communities of practice? Management Learning (Special Issue), 29(3), 259-272.
18.
Feyerherm, A.E. (1995). Changing and converging mind-sets of participants during collaborative environmental rule-making: Two negotiated regulation case studies. Research in Corporate Social Performance andPolicy Supplement, 1, 231-257.
19.
Franke, U.J. (1999). The virtual web as a new entrepreneurial approach to network organizations. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , 11, 203-230.
20.
Fulmer, R.M., & Keys, J.B. (1998). A conversation with Peter Senge: New developments in organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 27(2), 43.
21.
Gray, B., & Hay, T.M. (1986). Political limits to inter-organizational consensus and change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 95-112.
22.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist.
23.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1991). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: The Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
24.
Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., & Light, S.S. (1995). Barriers broken and bridges built: A synthesis . In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & S. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 489-532). New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment . In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
26.
Hjern, B., & Porter, D. (1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2, 211-227.
27.
Howes, J., & Dewitt, J. (1998). Resolving the paradox of environmental protection. Issues inScience and Technology, 14(4), 57-65.
28.
Huxham, C. (Ed.). (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.
29.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.
30.
Imperial, M.T. (1999). Institutional analysis and ecosystem management: The institutional analysis and development framework. EnvironmentalManagement, 24, 449-465.
31.
Keast, R., Mandell, M.P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363-371.
32.
Kickert, W.J., Klijn, E.H., & Koppenjan, J.F.M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.
33.
Kofman, F., & Senge, P.M. (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 4-24.
34.
Lee, K.N. (1995). Deliberately seeking sustainability in the Columbia river basin. In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & S. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 214-238). New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
Lee, K.N. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), 3. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art13
36.
Lipnack, J.H., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams, reaching across space, time and organizations with technology. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Mandell, M.P. (1990). Network management: Strategic behavior in the public sector. In R. W. Gage & M. P. Mandel (Eds.), Strategies for managing inter-organizational policies and networks (pp. 29-53). Westport, CT : Praeger.
38.
Mandell, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
39.
Mandell, M.P., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through inter-organizational innovations: The importance of typologies, context, and management. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197-224.
40.
Manring, S.L., & Moore, S. (2006). Creating and managing a virtual inter-organizational learning network for greener production: A conceptual model and case study . Journal of Cleaner Production14, 891-899.
41.
Manring, S.L., & Pearsall, S. (2005). Creating an adaptive ecosystem management network among stakeholders of the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 16. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art16/
42.
Manring, S.L., Rivkin, G.W., & Rivkin, M.D. (2003). The application of network and learning organization models to improve ecosystem management: Monroe 2020 case study. Environmental Practice, 5(2), 13-27.
43.
Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (Eds.). (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1986). Network organisations: New concepts for new forms . California Management Review, 28, 62-73.
45.
Milward, H.B., & Wamsley, G.L. (1982). Inter-organizational policy systems and research on public organizations. Administration and Society, 13, 457-478.
46.
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 2. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vo9/iss4/art12
47.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (1997a). Implementing public innovations in network settings . Administration and Society, 29(2), 115-138.
49.
O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (1997b). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review , 57(1), 45-52.
50.
Pearsall, S. (1984). Multi-agency planning for natural areas in Tennessee . Public Administration Review, 44(1), 43-48.
51.
Pearsall, S., McCrodden, B.J., & Townsend, P.A. (2005). Adaptive management of flows in the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA. EnvironmentalManagement, 35(4), 353-367.
52.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
53.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 23-43.
54.
Rainey, H.G., & Milward, H.B. (1983). Public organizations: Policy networks and environments . In R. H. Hall & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 133-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Rogers, K., Roux, D., & Biggs, H. (2000). Challenges for catchment management agencies: Lessons from bureaucracies, business, and resource management. Water SA, 26, 505-511.
56.
Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A., & Holmgren, M. (2002). Dynamic interactions of societies and ecosystems—Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 195-239). Washington, DC: Island Press.
59.
Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Selin, S., & Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model of environmental planning and management. EnvironmentalManagement, 19, 189-195.
61.
Senge, P.M. (1990a). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency .
62.
Senge, P.M. (1990b). The leader's new work: Building learning organizations . Sloan Management Review Reprint Series, 32, 7-23.
63.
Senge, P.M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., & Smith, B. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York: Doubleday/Currency .
Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36, 269-284.
68.
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2006). Achieving collaborative advantage: Understanding the challenge and making it happen. Strategic Direction Journal , 22(2), 3-5.
69.
Venkatraman, N., & Henderson, C. (1996). The architecture of virtual organizing: Leveraging three independent vectors (discussion paper, Systems Research Center, School of Management). Boston: Boston University .
70.
Walters, C.J., & Holling, C.S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71, 2060-2068.
71.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
72.
Westley, F. (1995). Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystems management. In L. H. Gunderson , C. S. Holling, & S. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 391-427). New York: Columbia University Press.
73.
Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines pages. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 333-360). Washington, DC: Island Press.
74.
Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65-90.
75.
Wondolleck, J., & Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
