Does mass immigration and increasing ethnic diversity challenge the legitimacy of the universal welfare state? Assuming that basic income can be seen as a radical extension of the universal welfare state, we pursue this question by investigating whether popular reactions towards a basic income proposal are susceptible to persuasion that invokes attitudes towards immigration. The study is based on survey data covering a representative sample of the Norwegian electorate. We find that a comfortable majority express sympathy with the idea of a basic income, and that the structure of initial support for the basic income proposal is well in line with established findings concerning attitudes towards welfare state institutions and redistributive policies more generally. However, by applying a persuasion experiment, we show that negative attitudes towards immigration can be mobilized to significantly reduce the scope of support for a basic income proposal among the Norwegian electorate.
Aalberg, T. (1998) ‘Norske likhetsverdier i et komparativt perspektiv’, Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning39: 490-515.
2.
Aardal, B. (ed.) (2001) Velgere i villrede. En analyse av stortingsvalget. Oslo: Damm.
3.
Achen, C. H. (1975) ‘Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response’, American Political Science Review69: 1218-1231.
4.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E. L., and Sacerdote, B. (2002) ‘Why Doesn’t the US have a European Style Welfare State’, Brooking Papers on Economic ActivityFall: 187-278.
5.
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Andersson, J.-O. (2000) ‘The History of an Idea: Why Did Basic Income Thrill the Finns, But Not the Swedes?’, in R. van der Veen and L. Groot (eds) Basic Income on the Agenda. Policy Objectives and Political Chances. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
7.
Andersson, J. O. and Kangas, O. (2002) ‘Popular Support for Basic Income in Sweden and Finland’, paper presented at the 9th BIEN International Congress, Geneva, 12-14 September.
8.
Atkinson, A. B. (1998) Poverty in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Baldwin, P. (1990) The Politics of Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Banting, K., Johnston, R. and Soroka, S. N. (2004) ‘Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State’, in van P. Parijs (ed.) Cultural Diversity Versus Economic Solidarity. Brussels: Deboeck University.
11.
Banting, K., Johnston, R. and Soroka, S. N. (2005) ‘Immigration and Redistribution in a Global Era’, in S. Bowleset al. (eds) Globalization and the Politics of Redistribution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Becker, G. (1957) The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Blom, S. and Lie, B. (2003) ‘Holdning til innvandrere og innvandring. Spørsmål i SSB’s omnibus i August/September 2003’, Notater 2003/87. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.
14.
Brochmann, G. and Hagelund, A. (2005) Innvandringens velferdspolitiske konsekvenser. Nordisk kunnskaps-status. TemaNord 2005: 506. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
15.
Cameron, D. (1978) ‘The Expansion of the Public Economy’, American Political Science Review72: 1243-1261.
16.
Chong, D. (1996) Creating Common Frames of Reference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Converse, P. E. (1964) ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in D. E. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. London: Collier-Macmillan.
18.
Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1987) ‘From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare State: The Development of Scandinavian Social Policy’, in R. Erikssonet al. (eds) The Scandinavian Model. Aarmonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
19.
Feldman, S. and Zaller, J. R. (1992) ‘The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State’, American Journal of Political Science36: 268-307.
20.
Freeman, G. P. (1986) ‘Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science485 (May): 51-63.
21.
Gilens, M. (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Goodin, R. E. (2000) ‘Crumbling Pillars: Social Security Futures’, Political Quarterly7: 144-150.
23.
Goul-Andersen, J. (1993) ‘Sources of Welfare State Support in Denmark: Self-Interest or Way of Life’, in E. J. Hansenet al. (eds) Welfare Trends in Scandinavian Countries. New York: M. E. Sharpe
24.
Grovers, R. M. (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley.
25.
Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
26.
Jacobs, L. R. and Shapiro, R. Y. (1999) Myths and Misunderstandings About Public Opinion Toward Social Security: Knowledge, Support and Reformism. New York: Century Foundation.
27.
Jensen, U. S. and Poulsen, J. J. (1990) ‘Solidaritetens former. En teori om sammenhængen mellem kollektivisme, uddannelse og fællesskabets afgrænsning’, Politica22: 282-305.
28.
Judd, C. M. and Milburn, M. A. (1980) ‘The Structure of Attitude Systems in the General Public: Comparisons of a Structural Equation Model’, American Sociological Review45: 627-643.
29.
Katzenstein, P. (1985) Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Kildal, N. and Kuhnle, S. (2002) ‘The Principle of Universalism: Tracing a Key Concept in the Scandinavian Welfare Model’, paper presented at the 9th BIEN International Congress, Geneva, 12-14 September.
31.
Kinder, D. R. and Palfrey, T. R. (1993) ‘On Behalf of an Experimental Political Science’, in D. R. Kinder and T. R. Palfrey (eds) Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
32.
Kitschelt, H. (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Lipset, S. M. and Marks, G. (2000) It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York: W. W Norton & Co.
34.
McGraw, K. M. and Lodge, M. (1995) ‘Introduction’, in M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (eds) Political Judgement. Structure and Process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
35.
Meade, J. E. (1993) Liberty, Equality and Efficiency. London: Macmillan.
36.
Mutz, D. C., Sniderman, P. M. and Brody, R. A. (1996) Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
37.
OECD (2003) Trends in International Migration. SOPEMI Annual-2002. Paris: OECD.
38.
Øverbye, E. (2000) Commitment to welfare: a question of trust. Skrift 4/00. NOVA.
39.
Pettersen, P. A. (1995) ‘The Welfare State: The Security Dimension’, in O. Borre and E. Scarbrough (eds) The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Pioch, R. (2000) ‘EU Integration and Basic Income-Rethinking Social Justice in Competitive Welfare States’, paper presented at the 8th BIEN Congress ‘Economic Citizenship Rights for 21st Century.’Berlin, Wissenshaftszentrum, 6-7 October.
41.
Poulsen, J. J. (1998) ‘Fremmede i båden!-multikulturelle problemer og multikulturel kompetence’, Politica30: 132-148.
42.
Quadagno, J. (1994) The Colour of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Ragin, C. (1994) ‘A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Pension Systems’, in T. Janoski and A. M. Hicks (eds) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Rojas, M. (1999) The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model. London: Social Market Foundation
45.
Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Rothstein, B. (2005) Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. London: Sage.
48.
Sniderman, P. M. and Grob, D. B. (1996) ‘Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys’, Annual Review of Sociology22: 377-399.
49.
Sniderman, P. M., Piazza, T. and Kendrick, A. (1991) ‘Ideology and Issue Persuasability: Dynamics of Racial Policy Attitudes’, in P. M. Sniderman, R. A. Brody and P. E. Tetlock (eds) Reasoning and Choice. Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
St. meld. No. 6 (2002-2003) [Government White Paper].
51.
Standing, G. (2002) Beyond the New Paternalism. Basic Security as Equality. London: Verso.
52.
Sørensen, A. B. (1998) ‘On Kings, Pietism, and Rent-Seeking in Scandinavian Welfare States’, Acta Sociologica41: 363-375.
53.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1995) ‘Who Wants the Welfare State? Support for State Welfare in European Countries’, in S. Svallfors (ed.) In the Eye of the Beholder. Opinions on Welfare and Justice in Comparative Perspective. Stockholm: Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation.
54.
Thalammer, E., Zucha, V., Enzenhofer, E., Salfinger, B. and Ogris, G. (2001) Attitudes Towards Minority Groups in the European Union. A Special Analysis of the Eurobarometer 2000 Survey on Behalf of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. Vienna: SORAvan.
55.
van Oorschot, W. and Halman, L. (2000) ‘Blame or Fate, Individual or Social? An International Comparison of Popular Explanations of Poverty’, European Societies2: 1-28.
56.
van Parijs, P. (1995) Real Freedom for All. What (if anything) Can Justify Capitalism?Oxford: Clarendon Press.
