People today lead busy, hurried lives with competing time claims between the spheres of paid work and the household. The aim of this article is to provide more insight into the way men and women experience the multiple claims on their time and to attempt to understand the differences between European countries in this respect. Are we able to draw a sharp line in the work-family balance experienced in eastern and western Europe? Expectations are formulated at the individual level (work and home-related factors) and at the contextual level (gender culture and family policy). Data were gathered in 2001 within the international research programme ‘Households, Work and Flexibility’, financed by the European Union. The eight countries included in the analyses are Sweden, the Netherlands, UK, Slovenia, Hungary, Czech Republic, Romania and Bulgaria, and hypotheses are tested using multivariate regression analyses. At the contextual level, results reflect more support for the gender culture hypothesis than for the family friendly policy hypothesis. The multiplicity of options in western European countries due to the emancipation process causes time pressure. Individual factors are especially important in explaining combination pressure in the three western European countries: long working hours, overtime work, demanding job and having young children all add to the pressure men and women experience.
Allan, G. and Crow, G. (2001) Families, Households and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
2.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage .
3.
Coltrane, S. and Adams, M. (2001) ‘Men’s Family Work: Child-Centered Fathering and the Sharing of Domestic Labor’, in R. Hertz and N. L. Marshall (eds) Working Families: the Transformation of the American Home, pp. 72-99. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
4.
Cousins, C. and Tang, N. (2002) Households, Work and Flexibility in Europe: the Integration of Work and Family in West and Central East Europe . Paper for the ISA conference.
5.
Cousins, C. and Tang, N. (2003) ‘Working Time, Gender and Family: an East-West European Comparison’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 4. Comparative Report, pp. 205-224. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
6.
Coverman, S. (1985) ‘Explaining Husband’s Participation in Domestic Labor’ , Sociological Quarterly26: 81-97 .
7.
Crompton, R. (2002) ‘Employment, Flexible Working and the Family’ , British Journal of Sociology53: 537-558 .
8.
Deacon, B. (1992) Social Policy, Social Justice and Citizenship in Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Avebury .
9.
Deacon, B. (2000) ‘Eastern European Welfare States: the Impact of the Politics of Globalization’ , Journal of European Social Policy10: 121-146 .
10.
Duncan (1996) ‘The Diverse Worlds of European Patriarchy’, in M. D. Garcia-Ramon and J. Monks (eds) Women of the European Union: the Politics of Work and Daily Life. London: Routledge .
11.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
12.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1998) Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
13.
Fodor, E. , Glass, C. , Kawachi, J. and Popescu, L. (2002) ‘Family Policies and Gender in Hungary, Poland and Romania’ , Communist and Post-Communist Studies475-490 .
14.
Fraser, N. (1994) ‘After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State’ , Political Theory22: 591-618 .
15.
Garhammer, M. (2002) Pace of Life and Enjoyment of Life. Paper presented at the IATUR conference on ‘Time Pressure in European Countries’, Lisbon, October 2002.
16.
Gershuny, J. (2000) Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Post-Industrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
17.
Gleick, J. (1999) Faster: the Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Pantheon Books .
18.
Greenstein, T. N. (2000) ‘Economic Dependence, Gender and the Division of Labor in the Home: a Replication and Extension’ , Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 322-335 .
19.
Groenendijk, H. (1998) Werken en Zorgen: de Moeite Waard. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel.
20.
Heitlinger, A. (1996) ‘Framing Feminism in Post-Communist Czech Republic’ , Communist and Post-Communist Studies29: 77-93 .
21.
Hiller, D. V. (1984) ‘Power Dependence and Division of Family Works’ , Sex Roles10: 1003-1019 .
22.
Hochschild, A. R. (1997) The Time Bind. When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books .
23.
Jager, A. K. (2002) ‘Households, Work and Flexiblity: The Netherlands’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 3. HWF Research Report by Countries, pp. 79-148. HWF Research Consortium Vienna .
24.
Karasek, R. , Gardell, B. and Lindell, J. (1987) ‘Work and Non-Work Correlates of Illness and Behaviour in Male and Female Swedish White Collar Workers’ , Journal of Occupational Behaviour8: 187-207 .
25.
Kluwer, E. S. , Heesink, J. A. and Van de Vliert, E. (2002) ‘The Division of Labor across the Transition to Parenthood: a Justice Perspective’ , Journal of Marriage and the Family64: 930-943 .
26.
Kovacheva, S. (2002) ‘Households, Work and Flexibility: Bulgaria’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 3. HWF Research Report by Countries, pp. 341-394. HWF Research Consortium Vienna .
27.
Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’ , Journal of European Social Policy2-2 .
28.
Lewis, S. and Cooper, C. (1989) Career Couples. Contemporary Lifestyles and How to Manage Them. London: Unwin Paperbacks .
29.
Lippe, T. van der (2001) ‘The Effect of Individual and Institutional Constraints on Hours of Paid Work of Women in European Countries’, in T. van der Lippe and L. van Dijk (eds) Women’s Employment in a Comparative Perspective, pp. 221-243. New York: Aldine .
30.
Lippe, T. van der and Fodor, E. (1998) ‘Changes in Gender Inequality in Six Eastern European Countries’ , Acta Sociologica41: 131-150 .
31.
Lippe, T.van der, Tijdens, K. and De Ruijter, E. (2004) ‘Outsourcing of Domestic Tasks and Time-Saving Effects’ , Journal of Family Issues25: 216-240 .
32.
Makkai, T. (1994) ‘Social Policy and Gender in Eastern Europe’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 188-205. London: Sage .
33.
Medgyesi, M. (2002) ‘Hungary’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 1. Critical Review of Literature and Discourses about Flexibility, 137-154. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
34.
Moen, P. and Han, S.-K. (2001) ‘Gendered Careers: a Life Course Perspective’, in R. Hertz and N. L. Marshall (eds) Working Families: the Transformation of the American Home, pp. 42-57. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
35.
Orloff, A. (1996) ‘Gender in the Welfare State’ , Annual Review of Sociology22: 51-78 .
36.
Peters, P. (2000) The Vulnerable Hours of Leisure. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis .
37.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1996) ‘Analyse Internationalen Differenzen in der Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen. Theoretischer Rahmen und Empirische Ergebnisse’ , Kölner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpschyologie48: 462-492 .
38.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998) ‘Culture or Structure as Explanations for Differences in Part-time Work in Germany, Finland and the Netherlands?’, in J. O’Reilly and C. Fagan (eds) Part-Time Prospects, pp. 177-198. London: Routledge .
39.
Pittman, J. F. , Kerpelman, J. L. and Solheim, C. A. (2001) ‘Stress and Performance Standards: a Dynamic Approach to Time Spent in Housework’ , Journal of Marriage and the Family63: 1111-1121 .
40.
Presser, H. B. (2000) ‘Nonstandard Work Schedules and Marital Instability’ , Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 93-110 .
41.
Schor, J. B. (1992) The Overworked American. The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York, NY: Basic Books .
42.
Schor, J. B. (1998) The Overspent American. Upscaling and Downshifting and the New Consumer. New York, NY: Basic Books .
43.
Sicherl, P. and Remec, M. (2002) ‘Slovenia’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 1. Critical Review of Literature and Discourses about Flexibility, pp. 105-122. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
44.
Sicherl, P. and Remec, M. (2003) ‘Country Survey Reports, Slovenia’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 3. HWF Survey: Country Survey Reports, pp. 209-262. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
45.
Sommestad, L. (2001) ‘Gender Equality - a Key to our Future Economic Prosperity?’Current Sweden, September 2001.
46.
Stanculescu, M. S. and Berevoescu, I. (2002) ‘Romania’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 1. Critical Review of Literature and Discourses about Flexibility, pp. 187-225. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
47.
Strandh, M. and Boje, T. (2002) ‘Sweden’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 1. Critical Review of Literature and Discourses about Flexibility, pp. 81-104. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
48.
Strandh, M. and Nordenmark, M. (2002) The Interference of Paid Work with Family Life in Different Social Policy Contexts: Role Conflicts in Sweden, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Hungary and Czech Republic . Paper for the ISA conference.
49.
Vecernik, J. and Stepankova, P. (2002) ‘Czech Republic’, in C. Wallace (ed.) HWF Research Report No. 1. Critical Review of Literature and Discourses about Flexibility, pp. 123-136. Vienna: HWF Research Consortium, Institute for Advanced Studies .
50.
Voydanoff, P. (2002) ‘Linkages between the Work-Family Interface and Work, Family and Individual Outcomes’ , Journal of Family Issues23: 138-164 .
51.
Wallace, C. (2000) Households, Work and Flexibility. Project funded under the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Union . FP5 Programme Acronym: HUMAN POTENTIAL Project Reference: HPSE- 1999-0030 Project Acronym: HWF. See also www.hwf.at.
52.
Wallace, C. (2003) HWF Research Report No. 4. HWF Survey: Comparative Report. Volume One. Cross-Country Overview and Reference Tables. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies .
53.
White, B. , Cox, C. and Cooper, C. (1992) Women’s Career Development. A Study of High Flyers. Oxford: Blackwell .
54.
Zemfir, C. (1997) ‘Social Insurance and Social Assistance in Countries in Transition’ , Romanian Journal of Sociology.
