Improving Work–Life Balance for Female Civil Servants in Law Enforcement: An Exploratory Analysis of the Federal Employee Paid Leave Act

Abstract

In late 2019, Congress passed the Federal Employee Paid Leave Act (FEPLA) establishing parental leave for most federal civilian employees. The new law provides up to 12 weeks of paid leave within 12 months after the birth, adoption, or foster placement of a child occurring on or after October 1, 2020. Despite its recent enactment, this study draws on survey data from 224 civil servants across 39 federal law enforcement agencies to examine the implications of FEPLA for improving work–life balance in the federal sector. Findings suggest that FEPLA will likely improve work–life balance for female civil servants. However, women may also be afraid to use FEPLA due to perceived loss of future promotional opportunities or other workplace visibilities.

Keywords

Federal Employee Paid Leave Act work–life balance family-friendly policies leave benefits parental leave

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bae

K. B.

Lee

Sohn

(2019). How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. federal agencies: Examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 565–583.

Baum

C. L.

Ruhm

C. J.

(2016). The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 333–356.

A Better Balance. (2020). Overview of paid family and medical leave laws in the United States. https://www.abetterbalance.org/resources/paid-family-leave-laws-chart/

Bradbury

M. D.

(2020). Voluntary shared leave: An exploratory analysis. Public Personnel Management, 49(4), 532–546.

Brooks

(2019). Federal law enforcement officers, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fleo16st.pdf

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Women in the labor force. http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2019/pdf/home.pdf

Caillier

J. G.

(2012). Satisfaction with work–life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement: Is there a connection? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 340–364.

Caillier

J. G.

(2016). Does satisfaction with family-friendly programs reduce turnover? A panel study conducted in U.S. federal agencies. Public Personnel Management, 45(3), 284–307.

Choi

(2018). Managing flexible work arrangements in government: Testing the effects of institutional and managerial support. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 26–50.

10.

Choi

(2020). Flexible work arrangements and employee retention: A longitudinal analysis of the federal workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470–495.

11.

Chzhen

Gromada

Rees

(2019). Are the world’s richest counties family friendly? https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/Family-Friendly-Policies-Research_UNICEF_%202019.pdf

12.

Cordner

(2011). Stuck on a plateau? Obstacles to recruitment, selection, and retention of women police. Police Quarterly, 14(3), 207–226.

13.

Cowan

R. L.

Bochantin

J. E.

(2009). Pregnancy and motherhood on the thin blue line: Female police officers’ perspectives on motherhood in a highly masculinized work environment. Women & Language, 32(1), 22–30.

14.

Durst

S. L.

(1999). Assessing the effect of family friendly programs on public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 19–33.

15.

Facer

R. L.

Wadsworth

L. L.

(2008). Alternative work schedules and work-family balance: A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 166–177.

16.

Feeney

Bernal

Bowman

(2014). Enabling work? Family-friendly policies and academic productivity for men and women scientists. Science and Public Policy, 41(6), 750–764.

17.

Feeney

Stritch

J. M.

(2019). Family-friendly policies, gender, and work-life balance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 422–448.

18.

Finkel

S. K.

Olswang

She

(1994). Childbirth, tenure, and promotion for women faculty. Review of Higher Education, 17(3), 259–270.

19.

Franklin

C. A.

(2005). Male peer support and the police culture: Understanding the resistance and opposition of women in policing. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(3), 1–25.

20.

Garcia

(2003). “Difference” in the police department. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 19(3), 330–344.

21.

Girardin

(2020, February 24). Debunking 5 misconceptions about federal paid leave. GovLoop. https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/debunking-5-misconceptions-about-federal-paid-leave/

22.

Haarr

R. N.

Morash

(2013). The effect of rank on policewomen coping with discrimination and harassment. Police Quarterly, 16(4), 395–419.

23.

Hamidullah

M. F.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2017). Intersectionality and family-friendly policies in the federal government: Perceptions of women of color. Administration & Society, 49(1), 105–120.

24.

Horowitz

J. M.

Parker

Graf

Lingston

(2017). Americans widely support paid family and medical leave, but differ over specific policies. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/03/23/americans-widely-support-paid-family-and-medical-leave-but-differ-over-specific-policies/

25.

Kenney

(2020). Colorado voters say yes to a paid family and medical leave program. https://www.cpr.org/2020/11/03/colorado-voters-say-yes-to-a-paid-family-and-medical-leave-program/

26.

Hur

Smith-Walter

(2013). Family-friendly work practices and job satisfaction and organizational performance: Moderating effects of managerial support and performance-oriented management. Public Personnel Management, 42(4), 545–565.

27.

Lee

Kim

S. Y.

(2018). A quasi-experimental examination of telework eligibility and participation in the U.S. federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 451–471.

28.

Lee

Hong

(2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 870–879.

29.

McNall

L. A.

Masuda

A. D.

Nicklin

J. M.

(2010). Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. The Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 61–81.

30.

Miller

(2019). States impose paid family leave while congress weighs national policy. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/states-impose-paid-family-leave-as-congress-weighs-national-policy.aspx

31.

Mullins

L. B.

(2014). Is family responsibilities discrimination the new sex discrimination? Lessons from school teachers’ perceptions. Review of Public Administration and Management, 2(1), 142–146.

32.

Mulvaney

M. A.

(2014). Leave programs/time off and work-stress family employee benefits programs, organizational commitments, and self-efficacy among municipal employees. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 459–489.

33.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2020). Paid family leave resources. https://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/paid-family-leave-resources.aspx

34.

National Partnership for Women & Children. (2020). Paid family/parental leave policies for municipal employees. https://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/economic-justice/paid-sick-days/paid-family-leave-policies-for-municipal-employees.pdf

35.

Newman

Matthews

(1999). Federal family-friendly workplace policies: Barriers to effective implementation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 34–48.

36.

Office of Personnel Management. (2015). Handbook on leave and workplace flexibilities for childbirth, adoption, and foster care. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/leave-administration/fact-sheets/handbook-on-leave-and-workplace-flexibilities-for-childbirth-adoption-and-foster-care.pdf

37.

Office of Personnel Management. (2018). Federal work-life survey government wide report. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/worklife/federal-work-life-survey/2018-federal-work-life-survey-report.pdf

38.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020a). Fact sheet: Availability pay. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/pay-administration/fact-sheets/availability-pay/

39.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020b). Paid parental leave for federal employees interim regulations. https://www.chcoc.gov/content/paid-parental-leave-federal-employees-interim-regulations

40.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020c). Pay and leave. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/

41.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020d). 2019 federal employee benefits report survey. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/employee-surveys/2019-federal-employee-benefits-survey-report.pdf

42.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020e). Work-life. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/worklife/

43.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). About: Our global reach. https://www.oecd.org/about/members-and-partners/

44.

Rabe-Hemp

C. E.

(2008). Survival in an “all boys club”: Policewomen and their fight for acceptance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 31(2), 251–270.

45.

Rabe-Hemp

C. E.

(2009). POLICEwomen or policeWOMEN? Doing gender and police work. Feminist Criminology, 4(2), 114–129.

46.

Ruhm

C. J.

(2017). A national paid parental leave policy for the United States. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/es_101917_national_paid_parental_leave_policy_ruhm.pdf

47.

Sabattini

Crosby

(2008). Overcoming resistance: Structures and attitudes. In Thomas

K. M.

(Ed.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 273–301). Taylor & Francis.

48.

Saltzstein

A. L.

Ting

Saltzstein

G. H.

(2001). Work-family balance and job satisfaction: The impact of family-friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 452–467.

49.

Schulze

(2011). Family leave and law enforcement: A survey of parents in U.S. police departments. Critical Criminology, 19(2), 137–153.

50.

Thompson

(2020). It’s official: State employees get paid parental leave. https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/2020/10/01/michigan-state-government-employees-paid-parental-leave-starts-2020/5880375002/

51.

Tower

L. E.

Alkadry

M. G.

(2008). The social costs of career success for women. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 144–165.

52.

Wadsworth

L. L.

Owens

B. P.

(2007). The effects of social support on work-family enhancement and work-family conflict in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 75–86.

53.

Wagner

(2020, August 7). OPM issues regulations for feds’ paid parental leave. Government Executive. https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2020/08/opm-issues-regulations-feds-paid-parental-leave/167555/

54.

The White House. (2021, April 28). Fact sheet: The American families plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/28/fact-sheet-the-american-families-plan/

55.

Yoder

(2020, January 9). Oops. Some federal workers are not covered by the new family leave law. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/oops-some-federal-workers-are-not-covered-by-the-new-family-leave-law/2020/01/09/82b657b8-3248-11ea-9313-6cba89b1b9fb_story.html

56.

Youngcourt

S. S.

Huffman

A. H.

(2005). Family-friendly policies in the police: Implications for work-family conflict. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 1(2), 138–162.

57.

H. H.

(2019). Work-life balance: An exploratory analysis of family-friendly policies for reducing turnover intentions among women in U.S. federal law enforcement. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 345–357.

58.

H. H.

(2020). Glass ceiling in federal law enforcement: An exploratory analysis of the factors contributing to women’s career advancement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 183–201.

59.

H. H.

Rauhaus

B. M.

(2019). All boys club or gender differences? Male officers perception of female officers’ workplace experiences in federal law enforcement. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(12), 1010–1019.