The international problem of differential achievement between groups of students has particular significance for New Zealand given its persistent problem of inequitable outcomes for Māori and Pasifika students, and those from poor communities. This qualitative study investigated how engagement in teacher inquiry supported student teachers’ understandings of, and practice for, equity. The 28 participants were in a one-year, equity-oriented Master's initial teacher education programme. The data set comprised 84 research-related assignments participants completed for their teacher inquiry course. Thematic data analysis showed that the structured inquiry process supported participants to challenge inequity by problematizing student engagement and to address this by using a range of evidence to enhance their teaching. Overall, the study suggests that inquiry as research process and stance, along with the application of the Facets equity framework in authentic teaching and learning contexts, is a powerful source of student teacher equity-focused professional learning and practice.
AinscowM. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587.
2.
AndersonL., & StillmanJ. (2011). Student Teachingfora Specialized Viewof Professional Practice? Opportunities to Learn in and for Urban, High-Needs Schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111412052.
3.
BraunV., and ClarkeV. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: Practical A. Guide for Beginners. Sage.
4.
BoltonS.W. (2017). Educational equity in New Zealand: Successes, challenges & opportunities. Fullbright New Zealand.
5.
BuxtonL. (2017). Ditching deficit thinking: Changing to a culture of high expectations. Issues in Educational Research, 27(2), 198–214.
6.
Cents-BoonstraM., Lichtwarck-AschoffA., DenessenE., AeltermanN., & HaerensL. (2020). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184.
7.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
8.
Cochran-SmithM., EllF., GrudnoffL., HaighM., HillM., & LudlowL. (2016). Initial Teacher Education: What does it take to put equity at the center?Teaching and Teacher Education 57:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.006
9.
CordingleyP. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020105.
10.
CostaA.L., & KallickB. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.
11.
DanielsonC. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12.
FlickU. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.
GibbsR., & PoskittJ. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (Years 7-10): A literature review. Report to the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education.
GrudnoffL., HaighM., HillM., Cochran-SmithM., Fiona Ell & LudlowL. (2016). Rethinking initial teacher education: preparing teachers for schools in low socio-economic communities in New Zealand. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42:4, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1215552.
17.
GrudnoffL., HaighM., HillM.F., Cochran-SmithM., EllF., & LudlowL. (2017). Teaching for equity: Insights from international evidence, The Curriculum Journal, 28(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1292934.
18.
HarrisL. (2010). Delivering, modifying or collaborating? Examining three teacher conceptions of how to facilitate student engagement. Teachers & Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903478037.
19.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
20.
HsiehH-F., & SheilaS. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
21.
KorthagenF., LoughranJ., & RussellT. (2006) Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 10-20-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022.
22.
Ladson-BillingsG.J.(2005). Istheteamallright? Diversityandteachereducation. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105275917.
23.
MeisselK., MeyerF., YaoE., & Rubie-DaviesC.M. (2017). Subjectivity of teacher judgments: Exploring student characteristics that influence teacher judgments of student ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.021.
NietoS. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003004.
oecd. (2016.). “Who and where are the Low-Performing Students?” in Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How To Help Them Succeed. oecd Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250246-en.
29.
OpferV.D., & PedderD. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609.
30.
Patton DavisL. & MuseusS. (2019). What Is deficit thinking? An analysis of conceptualizations of deficit thinking and implications for scholarly research. Currents, 1(1), 117–130. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3998/currents.17387731.0001.110.
31.
RankM., YoonH., & HirschlT. (2003). American poverty as a structural failing: Evidence and arguments. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(4), 3–29.
32.
Rubie-DaviesC.M. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raisin g the bar. Routledge.
33.
Rubie-DaviesC. M., WebberM., & TurnerH. (2018). Māori students flourishing in education: High teacher expectations, cultural responsiveness and family-school partnerships. In LiemG. A. D., D. M. McInerney (Eds.) Big theories revisited 2 (pp. 213-235). CharlotteNC, USA: Information Age Publishing.
34.
SchönD.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.
35.
SleeterC. E. (2008). Preparing white teachers for diverse students. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS., & McIntyreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research in teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 559–582). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
TurnerH., Rubie-DaviesC.M. (2015). Teacher Expectations, Ethnicity and the Achievement Gap. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 50(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0004-1.
37.
Uni Services. (2018). Evaluation of the teacher-led innovation fund: Final report.
Woolfolk HoyA., HoyW. K., & DavisH. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In WentzelK. & WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 627–655). Lawrence Erlbaum.
